The old man of the Northeast took out the dragon bone , does the legendary dragon really exist?

The dragon is a mythical hand, which, in its own right, combines the image of a mythical and legendary creature. Biologically and historically, no real dragons have been found. It's hard to say whether this will actually be discovered in the future.

I don't think the legendary dragon exists, the dragon is a totem, a fiction made up by ancient people. There is also no evidence in reality that dragons exist.

does not exist. Because dragons are legendary creatures and their abilities are contrary to the laws of nature, dragons cannot exist.

The keel here is not actually a dragon's bone. It is a substance formed by the petrification of the skeleton of some large animals. It can be used as medicine and has a lot of uses in traditional Chinese medicine.

It won't be real at the moment. Because there are no fossils of related creatures, and the dragon is also a creature made up by man himself.

No. Because the dragon is only a fictional creature, and the old man picked up is not a real dragon bone, the dragon does not exist.

Yes. The dragon is a mythical animal imagined by the Chinese nation and a totem of the Chinese nation, but it does not exist.

Dragons may really exist in ancient times, because they are too old to verify, and no one can tell whether there are really dragons. I think that since there is a legend of a dragon, there must have been a dragon in ancient times.

Dragons are legendary. The so-called "dragon bones" are nothing more than superstitious sayings, they are just the bones of other animals and are not difficult to find.

Although there are many old people who say that they have seen dragons, as far as the current archaeological finds are concerned, there is not enough evidence to prove that dragons really existed, so he can only be a legend now.

For thousands of years, we Chinese have proudly called ourselves "descendants of the dragon". In ancient times, rulers would also call themselves "True Dragon Sons". But whether there are dragons in this world or not has always been debated.

The generation of dragons, some say that it is a misspelled totem of different tribes, but there are also other theories that the dragon that the ancients said should be a crocodile, snake and other behemoths as dragons. Each dynasty has different depictions of dragons, but the image we see today is the final version. Actually, there is no universal statement.

The existence of dragons is still debated even in the 21st century.

Now that we can use our cameras to record what is happening in front of us, seeing is more convincing than word of mouth. "Shengjing Times" once recorded a falling dragon incident with pictures and truths. The incident occurred in 1934, when it is said that a behemoth fell into Yingcheon, causing some damage to local houses.

When people stepped forward to see what it was really like, they were shocked. Because it looks very similar to the legendary dragon.

Regarding the origin and appearance of this falling dragon, everyone has different opinions. Moreover, it was a time of war, and the keel that had been well preserved unfortunately disappeared in the chaos. But years later, things took a turning point.

There was an old man named Sun Zhengren who took out five bones, saying that this was the keel of the falling dragon in Yingchuan back then, which was given to him by the hostess when he was a housekeeper for a family. He has kept it for more than 60 years, and now he wants to ask the relevant departments to do an appraisal.

However, experts found that these five keels are more like wild horse fossils from 10,000 years ago. Although experts have not studied real keels, there is a certain difference between paleontological fossils and bones, which are particularly easy to distinguish. Therefore, these five bones may not be the keel of the year.

The truth of Yingchuan's falling dragon has returned to the original confusing situation.

We don't know what the truth of the matter is, because the information is limited, and the witnesses to the incident are old, even if experts try to find out the truth, there is no clear evidence to prove it. And what kind of style the keel was like back then is known only to witnesses at the time.