I ask about iaudio D2 and iriver Clix2

1.The sound quality is definitely clix, there is no doubt about this.

2.The screen material is still clix, it's AMOLED, but only, it's smaller, but the picture is very delicate and the color is good.

3.The battery is about the same.

4.The after-sales of famous brands are good.

I use clix, it's very good.

In fact, the sound quality of D2 and Clix is about the same, and there is no better way to say it.

But D2 supports double lossless, lossless and 320k ratio, of course, it is still better to be lossless.

Although the screen is better than Clix's AMOLED, the D2 is a little larger, and the actual effect is not much worse

Both of the original earbuds are not very good.

As for the battery, I think the D2 is longer.

After-sales are okay, but it may be a little slow at times.

Then clix's screen is 500 yuan

Finally, the sound quality is more D2, and if you like the look of Clix, Clix is also very good.

1.In terms of sound quality: Audio D2 is bigger than iRiver Clix2! Both in terms of thrust and supported formats, D2 is a spike for Clix2!

3.Electricity: This is not easy to compare. When fully charged, the usage time of D2 kills Clix2, but D2 needs to be charged for more than 20 hours on a single charge!

4.After-sales service: iriver seckill audio. I've never heard of audio after-sales!

5.Personally, I think D2 is easier to use!

In terms of sound quality, iRiver is actually better, but its original headphones are not good, and it has to be equipped with excellent headphones, and iAudio D2 sounds better because of Senhai's MX90VC headphones. **Both have their own advantages, the D2 screen is slightly larger, the Clix2 screen is not suitable for watching movies, but the Clix2 screen display is actually better. The battery is about the same.

After-sales service, in fact, the quality of both is very good, generally do not need any after-sales service, and it is almost aging after three years, but iAudio is not promoted enough in China, and it is not sold much. I bought my girlfriend CLIX2, because I think the appearance of D2 is really average, big square, and looks silly, while CLIX2 is much better-looking, and CLIX2 is more convenient and faster to operate, and the quality is also very good. I still recommend clix2.

In terms of sound quality, I added that the voice of Iodi is on the cold side, and the low midrange is weak, which is suitable for female voices and fevers; Avery and his voice are on the warmer side, which is more suitable for pop. But the sound quality is not absolute, as it can be compensated for by headphones and EQ.

If you don't pursue sound quality, you can exclude iaudio,The appearance is wise,The operation of clix's d-clik is very special,The response speed is very fast,You can even not look at the screen if you are familiar with it,P2 is a touch screen,The response speed is OK,I think CLIX is better in terms of workmanship,After all, it has won awards,The screen is better,It's amoled,The disadvantage is that it's not big enough,Only inches,Samsung P2 is inch,Battery life clix**5 hours,Audio 24 hours,P2**5 hours, Audio 35 hours.

Of course, it's P2, it's super cost-effective, and how good it is to upgrade the firmware!! I use P2 myself and am very satisfied!!

iAudio's machine's vocal restoration is very good,Very good at restoring the emotions contained in the vocals,But the performance of the musicality is not as heavy as Elli and,The landlord's problem,When the sound effect is not turned on, Aili and the sound is clearer and more thorough,All aspects are more balanced,It's more durable,Pure kind。 Iodi, on the other hand, has a clear voice, is colder and faithful to the original. So if you don't return the sound effects, it's still a little better for Avery and .

After all, it's more durable.

In addition, iAudio D2 and iRiver Clix2 are two, of course, I still recommend that the landlord choose iAudio has a lot of good sound effects, built-in BBE, mach3bass, MP enhance, 3D surround, pan, EQ filter sound effects. There are a lot of choices, there is always a taste suitable for the landlord, after all, Aiodi has really conquered countless ears, 1200 or so **, of course, it is not blown, and even the headphones equipped with it are very good Sennheiser MX-90VC headphone set. Of course, the overall sound quality is also much higher than iRiver's Clix2.

The iRiver Clix2 has a good surround effect, but the Iodi D2 makes up for it stronger. Although cowon d2The decoding chip used is the same as the telechips7801 chip of Avery and Clix2, but the performance of Aioudi is better.

If the landlord is really listening to songs, the iAudio D2, which has excellent low frequency and sound field, is more suitable for you.

How can I say that? It should be said that the sound quality of Avery and will be better.

iAudio feeds on BBE sound. I've compared G3 and T10 before. The result is no sound effects. The sound quality of Aili and is obviously better than that of iaudio.

But if you turn on the sound effect. That Avery and Iaudio are no compare.

In short, there are good and bad of the two. It's up to you to the style you like.

The low frequency of the Erihe machine is noticeably heavier.

Don't buy iaudio if you don't turn on the sound effect.,iaudio doesn't turn on the sound effect is not good.,clix2 doesn't turn on and it's okay.。 If you really don't want to open it, you might as well buy apples.

Both are not good for me, the Korean machine is because of the mediocre sound to make so much effort to study the sound effect, to enhance their value and sell the store, and then sell the appearance, don't you think that the real foreign manufacturers, such as Sony iPod, and Kenwood, Microsoft, etc., rarely use sound as a selling point? Why? People's hardware and circuit design, software level and service and unmatched, especially hardware, do not need to use a large number of sound effects like Korean brands to enhance their own value, such as Kenwood B9 This is an artifact, iPod is invincible after imod, Sony's sound effect and gorgeous original headphones do not need to make major changes.

I personally have B9 IpoD5 generation modification imod and a S706F Sony*** and iRiver Clix2 sent by my father, Clix2 If it wasn't for my father, I would have given it away, compared to domestic Korean brands in addition to the appearance has no advantage! Most of the domestic *** mp4 are decoded independently, and South Korea is still on the integration

iriver clix2 would be better, I tried, this is a relatively new way of encoding

Hello. 1 I feel that sound quality is something that objectively exists.

It's a matter of personal preference

2 d2 and Edio have always been mid-range (vocals) thin. Not suitable for vocals.

3 There was a comparative review of Clix and D2 You can look for it online.

4 Clix may sound better than D2 Listen to the words of the average pop.

5 Spinn is better than Clix. It should be better than d2.

But look at the style.

Clix Spinn W7 is all more suitable for pop.

D2 is suitable for classical instrumental music.

SRS is a bit of a chicken rib and it's not interesting.

BBE was also blown up.

d2>=spinn (the gap can be ignored) >w7>clix2

In addition, the gap between neighbors is not very large.

Sound quality is very subjective, and you may not be good when others say it's good!

In my case: d2>clix2>w7=sp.

In addition, D2 has BBE sound and iRiver is SRS sound.

I don't recommend D2 if you listen to the human voice, the midrange is weak!

Looking at your bounty score, it should be a detailed comparison, but I personally don't think there is any need to complicate simple problems, so I won't go into a long story, and there are a lot of parameters. Let's put it simply:If you want to choose D2+ for sound quality,To see**Choose P7,It's as simple as that,If you still have questions, you can click**Ask me。

Supplement: Aili and indeed going downhill, ** machines are all made in China (you read that right) chips, the battery life is not very good, Aioudi still adheres to the boutique route, the battery life is fifty hours, the chip is a Korean high-end telechips chip.

P7 chip if I'm not mistaken, it's Rockchip's rk27,Although the interface is designed by Avery and,But the sound quality really can't be compared with the old machine of Telechips chip and flying core,Although the chip is not absolute,But the domestic chip is absolutely no good sound。

The sound quality and electromagnetic endurance are definitely Avery and After all, Avery and the sound quality back then was one of the best in the world.

If you are a golden ear, it is recommended that you choose Avery and (I use Avery and) As for the rest, don't say too much, there is a comparison of the parameters on the Internet.

Absolutely Avery and good! Don't hesitate.

Give it points.

Hello. From the point of view of **, the D2+ of 4GB is far better than the P7 of 16GB In terms of performance, P7 is no worse than D2+; I'm a layman, but judging from the screen size alone, the D2+'s only inch screen should be eliminated by history.

Aiodi is aimed at high-end players.

But if it's me, I'm sure I'll buy it cheaply.

Similar to Blue Devil, Taipower, and even Onda.

Some humble opinions, I hope it will help you.

Watching movies or listening**? Watching a movie, it must be P7 Luo! If it's listening, it's mainly D2+,Although Aili and Aioudi have always been models of high sound quality,But Aili and the machine has become more and more beautiful in the past two years, and there are more and more functions,The sound quality is going downhill。

Avery and look at what the chip is.

I don't have to say anything about the sound quality of foreign chips.

The current Avery and some are domestic chips.

D2 is still good.

Hello, there is indeed a clix, and that is U10

It is available in North America and the model number is clix

So what we call clix on the continent is clix2clix where it is currently discontinued.

2g of 1100? Almost.. If you want to buy it, hurry up and grab a generation of classics.

The chip is supported

After the firmware chain is upgraded, the code should be able to support the model.

But I believe that the power consumption can also be staggering.

320*** foot also

It's all like black on the front and white on the back.

It seems that the sound quality of the D2 is better, and it supports APE lossless.

In terms of operation and screen, Clix is much better** and lower than D2.

If it is, I'll buy clix

In terms of use, it is very convenient.

I guess you may be more interested in sound quality, so let's D2.