The man died from drinking substandard pesticides, and his family claimed 200,000 yuan, what is go

The man died from drinking "substandard" pesticides, and his family claimed 200,000 yuan, what is going on?

1. Why do men drink pesticides? This incident happened in Anhui, there was a man because life was not going well, so he bought two bottles of pesticides from a store, after returning home, the man drank the pesticides, and then the family found out, he was sent to the hospital, after **, the man was sent to a big hospital, but after four days of hospitalization, the man died after being discharged, after the man died, the family took the pesticide that the man drank. A testing agency conducted a test and finally found that the bottle of pesticide was unqualified, and then the family of the deceased sued the store that sold pesticides in court, hoping that the owner of the store would compensate the deceased for compensation, funeral expenses and family consolation, etc., a total of 200,000 yuan.

2. Is the family's claim reasonable? The reason why the family of the deceased will sue the owner of this store is because they feel that it is precisely because the pesticide sold by the owner of this store is unqualified, which led to the doctor to carry out ** on the deceased according to the composition of the pesticide, and finally the deceased was not able to be treated well, and there was a situation of death, so the family believes that the owner of this store must be responsible and compensate the deceased for various expenses. Originally, the deceased was going to commit suicide by drinking pesticides, but the family attributed the cause of the deceased's death to the substandard pesticides sold by the store, which was obviously very unreasonable, and after the trial, the court found that the pesticides were unqualified and not the cause of the patient's death, and rejected the claim of the deceased's family.

3. How do you evaluate this matter? After the death of the deceased, the family did not seem to have much grief, so they turned their heads to the store that sold pesticides to claim compensation, obviously, they wanted to blackmail others in this way, but they did not know that the pesticide was not due to his unqualified death of the deceased, because no matter whether the qualified doctor was interpreted, his method was the same, so the deceased's family's claim for compensation was completely blackmailing natureFrom this incident, we also see the indifference of human nature, the death of their own family, not only did they not look sad, but they were thinking about how to make a lot of money, which made people feel very cold.

Li drank the pesticide soon after was found to be sent to the hospital for gastric lavage, ** after 4 days of hospitalization and discharge, after being discharged from the hospital, Li unfortunately passed away, the family believes that the doctor is based on the pesticide bottle on the labeled ingredients, Li **. After testing, it was found that the pesticide was unqualified, resulting in the failure to treat the symptoms in time, resulting in the death of Li.

Normally, this pesticide will not cause death, but because the pesticide is not qualified, it caused the man to die, and finally the family received 200,000 yuan in compensation.

After the man died after drinking pesticides, the family believed that the pesticide manufacturer was very responsible.

It may be that the man threatened his family by drinking pesticides, but he didn't expect the toxicity of pesticides to be so great, which directly led to the man's death.

A man in Anhui Province committed suicide by drinking pesticides because of some unthinkable things, and the medicine itself had no lethal factors, but caused death, and the pesticides contained a large amount of paraquat.

This is because there was a man who wanted to commit suicide at that time, so he bought a bottle of pesticide, and then his family found that the bottle of pesticide was unqualified after investigation, so he sued the merchant in court and asked the merchant to claim 200,000 yuan.

Anhui man died by drinking substandard pesticides, and his family claimed 200,000 yuan from the pesticide seller, which is unreasonable, because if the seller sells substandard pesticides, it can only be said that there is a problem with product quality. There is no necessary connection between the quality of the product and the death of pesticides, so the family of the deceased should not attribute the cause of the deceased's death to the seller of pesticides, so the court rejected the plaintiff's claim and held that the seller did not have to bear the claim of 200,000 yuan.

1. An Anhui man committed suicide by drinking pesticides.

A man in Anhui bought two bottles of pesticides, and then committed suicide by drinking pesticides, although the family found out that they were also sent to the hospital in time, and the doctors did their best to treat them, but because the medicine was drunk for too long, the effect of the medicine had spread inside the man's body, so he died in the end. Unexpectedly, after the man's death, the family sent the pesticide to the testing part, saying that the pesticide component was unqualified.

Second, the family said that the substandard pesticides caused the man's death.

According to the results of the test, there is indeed a situation where the pesticide is unqualified, that is, there is a slight discrepancy between the actual composition of the pesticide and the ingredient content marked on the ingredient list, which makes the family grasp the handle. The family said that when the doctor treated, he was treated according to the content on the pesticide ratio table, but the actual content was different, which affected the doctor's treatment effect, so it led to the death of the man, so the seller of the pesticide should bear some responsibility. The family filed a claim and demanded compensation of 200,000 yuan from the seller.

3. The court rejected the plaintiff's request.

After the court accepted the matter, after investigation, it was found that although the pesticide had the problem of unqualified quality labeling, the seller of the pesticide did not know that the pesticide he sold would be drunk. In short, even if the pesticide ingredient is qualified, there is still a risk of death if it is drunk, and even if a man drinks a pesticide of acceptable quality, he will die, so the seller does not have to be liable.

I think this kind of compensation is particularly reasonable, although this person is willing to drink pesticides, but this pesticide is really unreasonable, so there should be such a compensation of 200,000 yuan.

Such behavior is unreasonable, because pesticides can cause serious harm to the human body if they are reasonable or unreasonable, and no one asks this man to drink pesticides.

This claim should not be justified because sometimes the people who buy and sell pesticides don't even know what you're doing, and most of the time they spray in the fields.

Such compensation is particularly reasonable, because it is true that the other party drank a particularly substandard pesticide and died. Therefore, the other party should be allowed to compensate.

A man in Anhui died of drinking substandard pesticides, and his family claimed 200,000 yuan, how did the court pronounce the judgment?

There was a man in Anhui who bought some pesticides in a store, and then the man drank these pesticides, and the family found out that the man was quickly sent to the hospital for treatment, but in the end it was not able to save the man's life, and in the end, the man died after rescue, and the family of the deceased sent the pesticide that the man drank to the relevant departments for testing, but the results of the test showed that the pesticides were unqualified Finally, the family of the deceased sued the person in charge of the store to the court.

The family of the deceased believes that the pesticide of the store is unqualified, which causes the doctor to rescue the deceased in accordance with the ingredients marked on the pesticide bottle in the process of rescue, so the best time for treatment is delayed to a certain extent, so the family of the deceased feels that the person in charge of the store must compensate, and the claim amount of the deceased's family is 200,000 yuan, but the family of the deceased did not take into account that the deceased voluntarily drank these pesticides, even if the composition of the pesticide is unqualified, it does not affect the hospital to treat the deceased. Therefore, the claim of the family of the deceased is indeed somewhat unreasonable.

After the trial, the court held that the deceased drank the pesticide knowing that the pesticide would cause great damage to the body, and whether there was a problem with the composition of the pesticide, the doctor would treat it according to the corresponding plan, and there was no difference in the plan whether it was symptomatic, so in the end, the court rejected the claim of the deceased's family, which shows that the claim of the deceased's family is not supported by the law, because the deceased drank the pesticide by himself and has nothing to do with the store. The court's verdict is reasonable, and it is hoped that the family of the deceased will be able to mourn and change their grievances, handle the aftermath of the deceased, and stop trying to shift the responsibility to others.

The court ruled that the family's claim was unreasonable because the man had the intention of committing suicide and could not show that the pesticide was not qualified.

The court rejected all the claims of Li's family in the first instance, Li is a person with full civil capacity, he knew that the two bottles of pesticides he bought were very toxic, and he could still kill after drinking them, but he still did not hesitate to drink a lot. Li's family was not satisfied, and appealed to the Suzhou Intermediate People's Court, and after the second trial, the original judgment was still upheld.

The court rejected the family's request because it was clearly vexatious, and no one forced him to drink pesticides, which would have led to death.

Suicide incidents are becoming more and more common in today's society, a man in Anhui died because of drinking substandard pesticides, and the family did not know about the man's extreme actions, but they were indignant about the man's death, and the manufacturer was sued in court after testing the pesticide and found that the quality was substandard. Pesticides were originally developed for land production, but in recent years, many people have taken pesticides to commit suicide, and the severe damage to the body caused by pesticides makes them deeply regret it, but everything has long been irreparable, and eventually they will pay the price for their childish behavior. We don't know the reason for the man's suicide, and the family also expressed their incomprehension, the truth may only be clear to the person concerned, and the pressure on life is huge now, I think the man's behavior of taking medicine does not rule out emotional reasons and life burdens, which are the factors that cause people to have a mental breakdown that cannot be resolved, and I hope that the family can analyze the cause of death around the above clues.

Here's my take.

Nowadays, people's living standards have been greatly improved, but the huge pressure of life has also followed, everyone has to strive for a happy life, this man may feel powerless about the burden of life, after the wrong choice to choose suicide, his approach is not a way to escape. <>

The concept of society is more open, and many people blindly pursue the result to bring trouble to themselves, and there are not a few examples of self-harm and suicide due to emotional disputes in life. <>

The family found that the quality was substandard after the pesticide test, and they sued the manufacturer in court that the man's death was related to the manufacturer, but the justice of the world is in the hearts of the people, and the court has rejected this unreasonable claim, hoping that the family can be cautious in words and deeds, and do not attribute the responsibility to external factors to cause unnecessary trouble. <>

The man lost a lot of money due to the failure of the investment, and his family was very depressed, and his family did not understand him very much, which put a lot of pressure on him, causing the man to have a mental breakdown, so he drank medicine and committed suicide.

Because he doesn't want to live anymore, he feels that life is meaningless, in fact, his thinking is one-sided, and he can go further on the road of life after negative emotions.

Because he is under more pressure, he is in a bad mood, and it is particularly irrational to find short-sightedness in this way.

It may be because the family is under a lot of pressure and has lost hope in life.

First, someone dies is sad and worthy of sympathy, a bottle of pesticide killed someone, in fact, it has nothing to do with the drug seller, the family thinks that someone has to pay the responsibility, that is also the family should be the most responsible.

Why are relatives reluctant to live, this is the most important sense of responsibility that should be considered, family members let relatives live a life that is worse than death, so there is an act of seeking death, even if the relatives themselves want to die, it has nothing to do with the drug seller.

The family should be heartbroken, the loss of a loved one is grief-stricken, but it is also necessary to consider why such a tragedy occurs in the family world, this is really the real world for which the family should be responsible.

The drug seller is responsible for selling the medicine, which means ignoring the complexion of the drug buyer, and he is not responsible for the death of the drug buyer.

Second, let the relatives go to the ground for peace, do not pursue the responsibility that has nothing to do with it, the family should understand the world of the death of the loved ones, this is by no means a short period of time to find death and life, the family wants to seek justice from the beginning of why the family died.

Pesticides are poisons for land use, which will not intentionally harm people, nor can they become criminal tools.

Someone died because of drinking pesticides, and the drug seller would be surprised, obviously a good person came to buy medicine, how could he become a criminal of someone else's family in a blink of an eye.

The victim's family should know that a person's willingness to die must be attacked.

3. Someone who murders someone must pay the price, and compensation should also be paid, but the stranger cannot be blindly wronged, and the victim's family needs to consider the long term.

Someone who harms others and dies also needs to be responsible, even the instigator will be punished, or there is reason to punish the suspicious person, otherwise it is the behavior of wronging others.

It is a fact that the family died, and it is a fact that pesticides are the culprits, so there is a reason for the cause of death in addition to suicide, that is, not saving the person who died or deliberately letting the suicide continue to commit suicide.

Legitimate revenge is the behavior that should be, and it is the reality that the bad guys should be punished reasonably and severely, as long as the evidence is conclusive, whoever pays the 200,000 is the perpetrator.