In ancient times when there was no divorce, could the ancients solve the problem by renouncing their

Under normal circumstances, a letter of resignation is finally resolved, because the status of girls in ancient times was not high, and basically what the husband said was what he said. Unless the woman's family is rich or an official, there will be a change.

OK. In ancient times, it was originally the words of the parents who ordered the matchmaker, so in ancient times, it was basically their own parents who were in charge, and the two families were free to decide to divorce their wives.

Yes, the ancients only needed a letter of divorce to divorce their wives, which shows the low status of women in feudal society.

The term "Hugh Shu" comes from the unreasonable social and legal system of ancient times, but it is recognized and legal. It is equal to the current divorce law. At that time, however, it was generally written by men to their wives.

The ancient divorce system included "divorce" and "divorce", which refers to the divorce between the husband and wife after reconciliation according to the principle of harmony is precious, rather than simply a piece of divorce from the husband.

And Hugh, the woman also has to bear the price. The most famous is Li Qingzhao, in the Spring Talk, the Song Law had a rule that a wife suing her husband would be imprisoned for three years. Li Qingzhao was imprisoned himself because of this. But fortunately, he was rescued by relatives and friends, and was released from prison in only 9 days.

It is called selling, because the concubine is a private property that is bought, and it can be sold at will, which is also the reason for the low status of the concubine.

Call out the concubine. Because they are private property, they can be bought and sold, and this is up to the wife to decide.

Selling or pawning is abandonment, concubines have no human rights in ancient times, the master's family can buy and sell concubines at will, concubines were slaves and maids in ancient times, and the status gap with the eldest wife is particularly large.

Therefore, Miss Guogong should not think about it as a concubine.

If a woman wants a divorce, then she can only sue the official, which is now a lawsuit.

1. In ancient times, women had a low status, and the initiative for divorce generally belonged to the man.

2. Li Qingzhao filed a lawsuit for divorce. This man is in Zhang Ruzhou, Zhang Ruzhou was a rhetorical man when he occasionally pursued Li Qingzhao, but after getting married, his true nature was exposed. He married Li Qingzhao mainly because he fell in love with her money, and often beat Li Qingzhao.

Li Qingzhao is a talented woman and is relatively open-minded, so she went to sue Zhang Ruzhou for divorce. In the end, Li Qingzhao won, and Zhang Ruzhou was exiled. Of course, this way can be possible, but not everyone is Li Qingzhao.

Ancient women rarely used this method.

Because the status of women in ancient times was very low, they could not take the initiative to file for divorce, and divorced women were very miserable, unless their mother's family was very powerful to divorce.

The main thing is to be divorced, the husband divorces his wife, in ancient times, there were very few people who divorced, unless it was really unbearable to write a letter of divorce, and the status of women in ancient times was very low.

Before the Song Dynasty, ancient women could reconcile and leave, as long as the other party agreed. After the Song Dynasty, they could only file a lawsuit for divorce.

In ancient times, if you wanted to divorce your wife, you only needed to write a letter of divorce. But the premise is that the wife's consent is required, otherwise the divorce will not be established.

No, in ancient times, it was not possible to divorce your wife casually, most of the reasons for divorce were because the wife had someone else outside, or she was not in good health, and some were because the wife had some bad habits.

I think that in ancient times, it was enough for a commoner family to divorce a wife, and if it was a wealthy family, only the wife could divorce after she had done something sorry for them, and the man could not divorce his wife for no reason.

Personally, I think that in ancient times, it was okay to divorce a wife with just a letter of divorce, and it was very simple, because it was like this in TV and movies.

There are three differences between the ancient letter of resignation and the current letter of resignation: first, in ancient times, the letter of resignation was generally proposed by the man, because the status of women was relatively low at that time, but now men and women are equal, and women can also file for divorce; The second is that in ancient times, after the man wrote the letter of divorce, the woman had to return to her parents' house unconditionally, and could not own the property after marriage, but the modern divorce agreement involves the clause on the distribution of property after marriage; The third is that the ancient letter of divorce did not involve the issue of child custody, but the current divorce agreement must have a child custody provision.

In ancient times, divorce letters were generally written by the man, and as long as the man wrote the divorce letter, he had already divorced his wife, even if the woman did not want to be divorced, it was difficult to negotiate. The divorced woman will also be pointed at by the world. The current divorce agreement, before signing, also needs to go through the marriage mediation room to adjust the feelings between the husband and wife, and really confirm that the relationship between the husband and wife has broken down before the divorce agreement can be signed, and both parties need to sign before the agreement can take effect.

In ancient times, the marriage contract was unilaterally dissolved, and there were no family property disputes, and it was generally the husband who divorced his wife, but now the divorce agreement is generally negotiated, and the most basic is about the division of marital property.

In my opinion, the ancient letter of divorce was that the wife returned to her parents' house and the two dissolved the marriage contract. Now it also involves the ownership of children, the distribution of property, etc., and there are many rules and regulations.

The divorce letter is only one-sided, the wife does not have any right to object, only the husband can operate, and the divorce agreement needs to be signed by both husband and wife, and the wife also has the right to refuse, and the divorce agreement is still.

In ancient times, the letter of divorce was issued by a man to a woman, proving that the woman was swept away by her in-laws, while the divorce certificate was issued to prove the termination of the marriage between the two people, and the final result was the same, but the impact on both parties was different.