There is no need to have any compassion for them, there is no need for that

Compassion is shared by everyone, depending on who is right, the Buddha has it for everyone, and only people have it for those who don't hate it.

Well, that's right, there must be something hateful about the poor man, and there is no need for that at all.

No one restricts others from thinking so, but no one wants others to impose their ideas on them.

Feng Shui takes turns" is an old Chinese saying. If you have compassion for others, they will care for you as well.

Well, it's really not necessary for people who don't deserve their own care.

The poor must have something to hate, and vice versa, and people have to look at things from many sides.

There is still a heart of mercy.

If it really is, it's not necessary.

The wretched will have something to hate.

Especially the guys who betrayed our compassion.

A little more compassion is good for you.

A talented lyricist, he is a white-clothed minister.

Being soft-hearted towards the enemy is the greatest risk to oneself.

It depends on who the object is, and there are many, many more aspects before you can make a judgment.

It depends on who it is, hopefully, who is not breaking your heart.

It seems to make a lot of sense.

You can't say that, sometimes things can't be said.

Well, just do what you want!!

To whom, why is it not necessary?

Appease Adolf Adolf Adolf loved.

Hehe, just like our teachers.

Everyone should have compassion.

If a person is indifferent to anything, then he can't be called a living person, but not only compassion is not allowed, but also needs the spirit of endeavor, blind charity is a completely desirable way, everyone's thinking is different, you feel that she (he) is helpful when you do something, you feel that he (she) should thank you, then you are wrong. People need a process in their enlightenment and confusion, and they can't come through it all at once.

We can be considerate and tolerant of the faults of others, but we should work with those in need to create a better tomorrow.

The meaning of this sentence is that not a person without feelings must be a true hero, and a person with compassion is not a manly man.

The author very much agrees with this sentence, a true hero and man, should have feelings and benevolence. I believe that many people have seen the movie "Train to Busan", and the details in it are the perfect interpretation of this sentence.

First of all, the muscular man played by Ma Dongxi is tall and mighty, and he looks like he will give people the illusion of machismo. But in fact, he is a "good man" who knows how to respect the old and love the young, and loves his wife. In the face of the danger of the feast, he was not afraid of life and death, and he always regarded his wife's personal safety above all else.

In the end, for the sake of his wife and the child in the belly of the old file Soupo, he bravely sacrificed himself in the face of death. It can be said that it is not tragic and touching. He loves his wife deeply and knows how to think about others, isn't such a loving and righteous man a hero!

There is also Kong Yoo, who is a professional manager, who is extremely harsh on others, but dotes on his daughter. Although he can't be defined as a hero, he can also be regarded as a manly man. In order for his daughter to survive, he bravely fought against zombies, and finally became infected by the virus and became a zombie.

But even at the moment when he became a zombie, his eyes did not leave his daughter's body, which was deeply moving.

True heroes are flesh and blood and have emotions. They not only know how to contribute to "everyone", but also protect their own "small family". What's more, if you don't have a small family, don't say anything at every turn, we have to sacrifice ourselves for others.

I think a responsible person is first responsible for himself, his family, and then he is responsible for others. It may be said that it is selfish, but this should be the normal psychology of an ordinary person.

To be a human being, we must have our own responsibilities, be responsible for ourselves, be responsible for our family, and be responsible for our society. Those who have feelings are the real heroes!

Mercy is the nature of human beings, and the argumentation method adopts the argumentation method of combining breaking and standing, and standing while breaking. The authentication methods are;

1.Break and stand combined. While refuting Hobbes's views, the author expounds his conclusions in a timely manner.

For example, the author refers to the state pants out of "Hobbes did not see ......"Therefore we hold that the reason why the barbarians are not wicked is precisely because of ......."”

2.Illustrate with examples. Rely on a large number of detailed examples to fully demonstrate your own views.

3.Deductive reasoning. For example: "Since Hobbes thinks that the wicked man is a strong child......He'll bite someone's leg. It was Hobbes's point of view that deduced many of the excesses of the barbarians, and thus refuted the error of Hobbes's view.

Although the witness in the story, as a stranger, does not have any special relationship with the person concerned, and the safety of the child has no real relationship with his own interests, he naturally has a great sense of grief because of the pain of the child, and has an urge to lend a hand.

This impulse is not to be grateful or praised, but only out of a strong and irrepressible sense of pity for the victim. This is a powerful proof that compassion is the most universal natural virtue of human beings.