Do I need to use a housing safety and quality report to open a shopping mall?

The change of use of the house is subject to approval, and the house must also meet the quality and safety requirements of the new use.

If you use a house to open a commercial factory, you need a housing safety and quality report to meet the conditions for bringing it to the market, and you need to apply for a business license.

Hello, it is generally necessary to report the safety and quality of the house, so that you can open a shopping mall, and you also need relevant procedures, specifically like this, I hope to help you!

Use the house to see if the shopping mall needs a housing safety and quality report, of course, you need it, you must have a house, a complete quality report, and some procedures in all aspects of fire protection.

If you want to use a house to open a shopping mall, you need to prepare a lot of materials, including fire safety. and other public facilities.

The use of housing to open a shopping mall, of course, requires a housing safety and quality report, this is for sure.

To open a shopping mall with a house, strictly speaking, of course, the safety and quality report of the house is required.

The use of housing to open a shopping mall must require a housing safety and quality report.

Does the aluminum house use the housing safety and quality report to open a shopping mall? This must have a safety and quality report.

The use of private houses to open shopping malls requires housing safety and quality reports! A fire permit is required!

Whether it is necessary to use the housing safety and quality report to open a shopping mall with a house, this must be used, because the relevant process must be consulted.

Theoretically, Bai said that because the roof is included in the public area of the building, it belongs to the owner of the whole building.

The DAO is shared, if it can be used internally, everyone can use it, and if it needs to be repaired, everyone has to pay for maintenance.

The top floor is a common part according to normal terms, and does not belong to any household, and it can be said that any household has ownership. However, generally speaking, no one wants to manage the top floor, and in most cases, the right to use belongs to the top users. Moreover, many old houses do not have property management companies, and there was no such thing as public maintenance ** (at that time, it was all infrastructure department), so the roof became a big problem.

When you use it, everyone uses it, and when it breaks, everyone says it's your roof, and they don't care.

The roof of the building belongs to all the owners

Article 6 of the Regulations on the Administration of Urban Houses with Different Properties and Adjacent Houses, as amended by the Ministry of Construction on August 15, 2001, stipulates that "the owners and users shall jointly and reasonably use the common foyers, balconies, roofs, corridors, kitchens, toilets, courtyard roads, water and sewage facilities, etc., and shall bear corresponding obligations; Unless otherwise agreed, neither party shall occupy or monopolize more.

The owner and user shall not engage in any act that harms the interests of other parties in the common or common parts of the house. Article 7 stipulates: "If a person other than the owner of a house with a different property needs to use the common parts of a house with a different property, he or she shall obtain the unanimous consent of all owners and sign a written agreement." ”

Accordingly, the roof is a common part of the building, and any person (including the real estate developer and the owner) does not have exclusive rights to the roof and should belong to all the owners, and the real estate development company has no right to sell the roof to the buyer without authorization. If a dispute arises between the use of the roof roof and the neighbors, it shall be handled in the following manner in judicial practice: if there is a public passage leading to the roof of the building in the commercial house, the residents of the top floor shall not obstruct other owners in the building from reaching the roof through the public passage; If there is no public passage, other owners who want to access the roof from the top floor residents must obtain the consent of the top floor residents.

The right to use the roof is to copy the entire property.

If the owner is in common, the developer has no right to give the top floor to the buyer without authorization, and the right to use it is not in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Law on the Sale and Purchase of Commercial Housing, so it has no legal effect.

According to Article 6 and Article 7 of the Regulations on the Administration of Urban Buildings with Different Properties, the roof is a common part of the building, and any person (including real estate developers and owners) does not have the exclusive right to the roof and should belong to all the owners, and the real estate development company has no right to sell the roof to the buyer without authorization.

The right to use the roof belongs to all the owners, not to the top floor residents.

According to the relevant provisions of the Property Law, if the property rights of the owner of the top floor of the contract for the purchase of a special house do not include the roof, and the roof belongs to the owners, since it belongs to the public space of the community, the right to use the public space belongs to all the owners, and the right of supervision belongs to the community owners' committee. Therefore, the right to use the roof is not reserved for the top floor users.

The right to use the roof space belongs to all the residents of the building, and only the attic with attic on the top floor belongs to the resident of the top floor.

I bought a small property right on the top floor, lived in it for more than three years, and now the roof is leaking, and he doesn't repair it when he finds the landlord, either he lets himself build a rainproof canopy, or he builds a simple color steel tile house for rent. It's really difficult, he insisted that the right to use was not written in the original sales agreement, and he had the right to build it!?

If the water seepage on the top floor has a big response to the top floor owner, is the responsibility Huai?

The premise of the validity of the contract is that the subject of the contract has the right to dispose of the top. Generally speaking, the right to use the top floor should belong to all owners.

The roof should belong to the roof user, because if the roof leaks, after all, it is the roof residents who are unlucky.

1. Once the landlord has signed a rental agreement with the tenant, he has established a lease relationship with him, so the landlord has the obligation to ensure the legality of the activities in the rental house, and the power of such supervision is not a public power, but a legal obligation.

2. Once the public security organ discovers that the tenant has committed illegal or criminal activities in the rental house, it will notify the landlord in writing and order him to immediately take back the house and require the landlord to bear the corresponding responsibility. If the landlord fails to report this, he has violated the criminal law and shall bear the corresponding criminal liability in accordance with the relevant regulations.

2. Article 7 of the "Provisions on the Administration of Public Security in Rental Housing" stipulates that the lessor of the house has the following legal responsibilities and obligations:

1. It is not allowed to rent the house to a tenant without legal and valid documents;

2. The tenant must sign a lease contract with the tenant, and if the tenant is a temporary resident from outside, he or she shall be led to the public security police station to declare the temporary residence registration and apply for a temporary residence permit;

3. Register the basic information of the tenant's name, gender, age, permanent residence, occupation or main economic status, service place and other basic information and file with the public security police station;

4. If it is found that the lessee is engaged in illegal and criminal activities or is suspected of violating the law or committing crimes, it shall report to the public security organ in a timely manner; Conduct frequent safety inspections on rented houses to discover and eliminate unsafe hidden dangers in a timely manner.

If you use your own house to run a café on the street and you list all the problems you listed, I think it is better to rent it to someone else.

The hidden cost is dRent.

For example, the funds used to purchase raw materials and equipment incur interest expenses, which are visible costs; Hiring security guards requires a salary, which is also a visible cost; The wear and tear of the equipment will incur maintenance costs, which can also be seen; The family helps take care of it, and you convert the pay, which is also the actual cost of the expenses. I only have rent, and I use my own house, so I don't have to pay rent on the surface, but if I don't open my own store. It is possible to generate rental income, and now this part of the income is gone, which is an invisible expense, and it is obviously a hidden cost.

It depends.

If the community has been fully constructed and handed over to the owner, then the right to use the vacant land should belong to all the owners.

If not, then according to the group to which the vacant land belongs to divide the right to use, whether it still belongs to the original developer or owner, in addition, the planning plan publicity is a necessary procedure, if you object, you should contact the planning department in time, and express your objection in writing to exercise the corresponding rights.

If the planning bureau does not receive any objections or the opposition is too weak, it will not hold a hearing, so they will turn a blind eye and give the developer a favor.

The developer has a plan and instructions, and there is no problem in building a house, otherwise it is an illegal operation.

Go to the local Housing and Urban-Rural Development Commission to inquire, and the developer complained to him without any formalities.

If there is a developer first, the land is owned by someone else, there is no violation of the law, and the developer can ask him to show a certificate of land use to determine whether it is illegal.

Generally, it is not allowed.

Unless approved.

Approval is certainly conditional.

If it's in a residential building, most of the time it's not possible.

That is, after completing the formalities, others feel that it is affected, and they can complain and ask for revocation.

If it is a separate hospital, it will not be affected by the environmental assessment, and it can be opened after completing the procedures.

Now that your land is industrial and not residential or commercial, you don't need to change the nature of your land if you want to make a residential property with a certain title"Auction and listing"Target. If there is no requirement for property rights, it should be possible to build a staff dormitory of a certain size! So it seems!

Now, in principle, all land must be posted at the land center, except for the troops. Limited to 8/31/04.

But as far as I know, not all projects are operated in this way, the smaller the city is not standardized, and there are still places where there is no certificate to pre-sell, which cannot be bound by terms.

The nature of the land is important, and if this is okay, it should be possible to build it yourself. This is what some real estate developers now mean by backdoor acquisitions.

I'm not engaged in the early stage, and the content in it is not guaranteed to be very accurate, so make a reference.

The nature of the land for residential buildings built using self-allocated land remains the same"Allocation".It cannot be bought or sold as a commercial house. If the listing transaction is to go through the land transfer procedures in accordance with the relevant regulations, pay the transfer fee, and apply for the land use certificate.