Now that it is popular in rural areas for children to take turns to take care of the elderly, what s

If you feel that it is unfair, you can go to the elderly to discuss it, and if you really feel very unfair and feel that you have been bullied, then you can sue directly.

In fact, I think that if there is such a problem, it is completely necessary for the family to sit down and negotiate to solve it, if you blindly refuse to pass the buck, then as a daughter, it is obvious that you will be infamous for unfilial piety, and there is no benefit to your reputation.

We can discuss with our parents, or we can take turns to raise them, and their parents have taken special care of us and have taken appropriate responsibilities for our children.

As a country with a strong sense of family, it should also be the unshirkable responsibility of children for parents to raise their children and support their parents. Although our country is vast and has different customs, the daughter who marries must also bear the responsibility of supporting the elderly.

Support is caring for elderly parents. The so-called maintenance mainly refers to the fact that the children financially provide the necessary daily necessities for their parents.

and the act of spending. That is, to assume certain economic responsibilities, provide necessary economic assistance, and meet reasonable material requirements. The law stipulates that children have the obligation to support their parents.

The reality is that most of the elderly in rural areas live in the same village as their sons. In fact, the sons are responsible for taking care of the elderly. After the sons got married and started a family, most of them separated.

As long as the old man can take care of himself, the old man's fields are all cultivated, and the old man's daily life is still arranged independently by the old man, and he does not need his son to take care of it. On the contrary, the old man cared more about his son. Not only do they have to help their sons and take care of their families, but they also have to take care of their children, so most of the children in rural areas are left behind.

And the old man! When the elderly can't work and can't take care of themselves, they can be regarded as entering the pension stage!

It has always been said that married girls splash water, especially in rural areas. When a girl gets married, she no longer participates in the housework of the family, and the girl is considered an outsider. After the daughter-in-law got married, she contributed to her parents' family. She said that her in-laws asked for a large dowry.

Married his mother's brother and brother and built a house. She has become widely known as the "devil's brother" and has done her best for her mother's family. Sorry family! The daughter of the family property does not participate in the distribution and has no inheritance rights.

The property of the mother's family will be inherited by the older brother and younger brother. Of course, whoever inherits is the pension.

Recipients! <>

Now the living conditions are better, and there are few disputes among the elderly. Today's daughter, when she is on vacation, will give money to her parents when she goes back to her parents' house. She bought a lot of clothes, fruits, snacks, and more, which added up to a lot of money.

So the sons who live with their parents basically don't care about this! Every family is different and everything is special. There are also disputes between parents and children over custody issues.

In the event of a dispute, relatives and friends will intervene to mediate. If mediation fails, it goes through the judiciary.

I think that all these ugly customs should be abolished, sons and daughters are the children of the elderly, and they are obliged to yam their own parents, and the inheritance of the old man also needs to be given to your daughter, and you can't engage in these concepts of inequality between men and women.

I think this kind of behavior is a kind of disrespect for parents, and it has also lost the dignity of being a daughter, which is a very disrespectful behavior.

** There are the following policies for the elderly in rural areas who do not have sons and only daughters:

1.Subsidy for all male and female seniors over the age of 60 will be provided with an additional allowance of RMB 300 per person per month.

2.Provision of medical services: Establishment of health centres in rural areas to provide free medical and basic medical services.

4.Provide living allowance: **Provide living allowance for the elderly in rural areas, and each elderly person will receive a subsidy of 300 yuan per month.

5.Provision of vocational training: ** Provision of training courses to provide skills training and mentoring for older adults.

6.Provision of employment opportunities: Provide employment opportunities that give seniors the opportunity to work from home.

7.Provide social welfare: **Provide social benefits for the elderly in rural areas, such as elderly care services, social assistance, social welfare funds, etc.

8.Establish a community support network: Integrate rural communities into a Kusong support network in urban communities to provide social support to rural seniors.

In short, ** provides multi-faceted policy support to the elderly in rural areas who have no sons and only daughters, helping them to survive a difficult old age.

Existence is justified. In fact, this is also a helpless move by children in the economy and society.

Supporting the elderly is the responsibility and obligation of every child, and it is also a traditional virtue. However, with the development of the economy and society, the various burdens and pressures of children have also increased dramatically, so there is a phenomenon of taking turns to serve the elderly, which seems fair and reasonable for children. Actually, there is no way.

The old man worked hard all his life and dedicated his life to his children. It is every child's duty to serve their loved ones. From a human point of view, taking turns to serve seems reasonable, but from a rational point of view, it also has its flaws, which are reflected in the fact that taking turns is a balance, but it does not achieve that kind of dedication.

The old man used to raise his children. In all dynasties, the ancestral lineage of our surname has been like this. Giving birth to children to prevent old age means that when you are old, let your children serve you.

Children take turns to serve, which can effectively reduce the burden of serving. If you are an only child, the burden of serving the elderly is heavier than that of two children. Therefore, it is more reasonable for children to take turns serving the elderly.

Behind this phenomenon of taking turns to serve the elderly, who has considered the psychological feelings of the elderly? The old man worked hard all his life to raise his children, but when he was old, he fell behind and lived in this home. Although it was his own child, the old man always felt uncomfortable.

It is certainly reasonable for children to take turns to care for the elderly, but it definitely has an impact on the physical and mental health of the elderly. It gives the elderly a feeling that they have become a ball of redundancy. When the elderly reach a certain age, they will have physical problems.

The simplest example is insomnia when changing places. Poor rest is a big problem, and the pros and cons can be imagined. Several sons take turns, a month or a few months, half a year or a year, and the brothers consult.

In rural areas, people cannot go to nursing homes because of economic conditions, so they can only take turns to serve the elderly. Daughters are not included because it is customary in our case for daughters not to inherit the estate. Instead, they should be involved, and daughters should also take turns serving and caring for the elderly with their older and younger brothers.

Supporting the elderly is both a virtue and a tradition, not to mention that everyone has an old age. Therefore, every child should do their best to accompany the elderly for the rest of their lives.

Because children take turns to serve the elderly, they feel undignified and feel like they are disliked. It is not fair to the children to take turns in their old age.

Many elderly people feel that such behavior is a kind of disrespect for themselves, and it is also a kind of disrespect for themselves. I think it's fairer, and in this way, you can take better care of the elderly, and you can free up more energy to take care of the elderly.

I think it's fair for children, but it's a toss for the elderly, so it's very repulsive.

I think it's unreasonable, because since my brother wants property, he should bear the responsibility of providing for the elderly.

If you analyze it from the perspective of a bystander, I think this approach is very unreasonable. But if you look at it from the perspective of your children, I don't think there's anything wrong with that.

The married girl is also raised by her parents and also has an obligation to support her parents, and the right of the parents to whom the property is owned by the parents has nothing to do with the daughter's obligation to support her.

I think it's unreasonable, this is a typical patriarchal thinking, not giving her daughter property, but asking her to provide for her old age.

In rural areas, family property is generally passed on to sons, and in rural areas, family property is relatively simple, that is, houses and land, and ordinary farmers do not have much savings.

We usually see such a phenomenon, when the farmer is old and needs to be taken care of, when the son wants his sisters to take turns to support their parents, because the economic pressure of young people is too great, often the old and the young, many times they take care of the children, but ignore the elderly, want to send the elderly to nursing homes, but because of insufficient economic conditions, can not provide high-quality retirement life for the elderly.

Then some families want all their children to participate in the rotation of the elderly, which is not only the obligation of the son, if the son is really in trouble at home and needs help, he will definitely let his sister come to ask for help, hoping to take care of the elderly together.

This is also forced by life, and there are not too many children of the elderly in rural areas now, such as my generation, some are still only children, needless to say, because parents only have one child, if there are two or three children, such as my brothers and sisters, there is nothing at home to take care of each other, which is no exception to the issue of parents providing for the elderly.

Therefore, for us now, supporting parents is not only the obligation of being a son, but also the obligation of a daughter, and filial piety is the first, some people think that the parents gave all the family property to the son, but the daughter did not get anything, so the daughter has no obligation to support her parents.

This is a wrong concept, for example, I have three brothers and sisters, I have an older sister, I also have a younger brother, my sister's children have gone to college, my parents are nearly 70 years old, people are old and sick, sometimes because of my family's limited economic conditions, I will definitely ask my sister for help, these are also very filial to my parents, often visit my parents, it is impossible to say that the family property is divided between me and my younger brother, and ignore my parents.

Will parents take turns to care for the elderly in the future? In fact, I don't approve of this way of providing for the elderly, because this way of providing for the elderly is easy to make parents disgusted, and even put pressure on their thoughts, the ideal approach is that parents follow themselves, brothers and sisters support each other, and work together to make the old age happy.

With the improvement and enhancement of living conditions, two-story houses have begun to be built in rural areas, and private cars have also been bought, and the quality of life has also been greatly improved. But what we still have to see is that there are still many unfilial sons in the countryside now, and these people are just reluctant to invest too much in the elderly. These people are obviously rich, why do they refuse to support their parents?

1.The old man does not have much savings.

Everyone knows that if the old man has a family property, the children will compete to honor the old man, so that the old man can get a share of the family property after a hundred years. But in fact, the elderly in rural areas generally do not have much money, so their children are not willing to support them, thinking that this is a thankless task.

2.The old man is partial to his children.

Everyone knows that the elderly in rural areas usually have several children, but these children do not think about supporting the elderly. Because the children will think that the elderly are more partial to whom, there will be an uneven distribution when the children are separated, so that the family relationship will become extremely embarrassing. Those who share less are naturally reluctant to support the elderly, and those who share more think that everyone should support them together, so that everyone does not support them.

3.There is a lot of pressure on children.

There are also some children who have a lot of pressure in their lives, and these children are getting married, so they pay more attention to money. Therefore, the children rightly believe that they have no money, and they naturally cannot fulfill their feelings of support for the elderly, and these are selfish practices.

4.Lack of morality.

Everyone knows that the current society is obsessed with money, so many people will work outside all year round, and they don't think about their old parents when they are full of food and drink. The main reason is the general lack of morality in society now, everyone is too materialistic, so filial piety has become chicken soup in the circle of friends.

5.Even if they are supported, the daughters who generally marry out always ignore their parents, but after a hundred years, if the old man leaves behind land or old houses and other properties, these daughters come to fight, and many times it leads to strangers between brothers and sisters or brothers and sisters, and no longer communicates!

I think this kind of daughter is a bit of a white-eyed wolf, because it is the responsibility of both children to support their parents.

I don't think that's right. Regardless of whether the daughter is married or not, she has the responsibility and obligation to support the elderly. This is what you should do as a child.