When the epidemic comes, do health care workers have the right to choose to take shelter?

When the epidemic came, medical staff did not have the right to hide.

"Right to avoid danger" refers to the right of an individual to take recess when he or she encounters danger. The right of emergency refuge has been widely used in the field of production safety, reflecting the principle of rights protection and public relief. The General Principles of the Civil Law stipulate that if damage is caused by emergency avoidance, the person who caused the danger shall bear civil liability.

However, it is difficult to grasp the boundaries of the use of the emergency avoidance right, and it is often based on the subjective judgment made by the hedger on the objective environment. It is precisely for this reason that there is no clear regulation on whether professions such as doctors have the "right to avoid risk" when performing their normal professions, and how to use them in detail, and there is also great controversy.

There is no corresponding right to be granted, which also blocks the choice of relevant personnel to avoid risks. In terms of occupational risk avoidance of medical staff, affected by the service attributes and public welfare attributes of the medical profession, the precondition of "emergency" for the emergency avoidance right is set up, which deprives the parties of their right to independent judgment in disguise, making risk avoidance a re-choice in a special state, rather than a random response based on personal prediction of the scene. This raises the threshold for initiating the avoidance procedure, so that medical staff cannot make accurate judgments and quickly avoid threats of violence.

The reason why the "right of hedging" has become a gap in the medical industry is also due to the fear that this right will be abused and delay the efficiency of medical treatment. This is especially prominent in private medical institutions with a lower level of public welfare, and the momentum of medical institution investors to grant and activate the right to hedge is relatively weak, and some hospitals have also set up "grievance awards" for this. Such an approach abandons the best option in the event of conflict, and lays the groundwork for the escalation of violence and the occurrence of harm.

Avoiding danger at the first time allows both doctors and patients to have a buffer period and cooling-off period, leaving the greatest room for reconciliation and maneuver.

If when the epidemic comes, medical personnel do not have the right to choose to dodge, because medical personnel are to save lives and help the wounded, so in the era of peace, they need to treat people, then if there is a time when there is something catastrophic as we say, when it appears, they should take the duty of doctors as their duty, and they are not qualified or obliged to choose to dodge, this is not their right to treat people to overcome difficulties, it is their obligation, Of course, everyone will admire them for this.

When the epidemic comes, medical staff have the freedom to choose to take a step forward, or to stay put, refrain from taking a step back, and their choice is not restricted, fettered and restricted.

When the epidemic came, almost 100% of the medical staff chose to take a step forward, no one would choose to stay put, and no one chose to take a step back, which is the medical ethics of medical staff.

In the face of the epidemic, medical staff have taken the initiative to ask for help, asking to go to the front line, through their medical ingenuity and hard-working hands, to realize the value of life, this unswerving attitude to life is worthy of praise and affirmation.

Under the current epidemic, medical staff have performed many moving stories that can be sung and cried. Their actions fully demonstrate their consciousness and pursuit of life. In the face of disasters, he was not defeated and chose to dodge, but still adhered to his sincere original intention to save lives and help the wounded.

When the epidemic comes, medical staff have no choice to hide, and medical staff must be obliged to find ways to meet the challenge. This is the vocation of healthcare professionals.

I believe that health care workers have the right to choose to hide. But none of them will choose to hide, they are all fighting on the front line of the epidemic.

From the end of 2019, the epidemic began to spread across the country. Among them, Wuhan is the most serious epidemic, facing a shortage of medical staff and a serious shortage of supplies, but other cities have not given up on Wuhan, and many medical workers in various places and cities have enthusiastically gone to the front line of the epidemic to save this sick city. In the years that followed, whenever one city was sick, other places would send supplies and medical staff to support us, because we were one.

Medical workers have the right to hide, but because they are medical workers and are wearing white, they will not choose to hide, they will choose to treat the disease and save people, go to the front line, and fight the epidemic to the end. I believe that the epidemic will eventually be defeated, and the days of not wearing masks will come back sooner!

First of all, responding to the epidemic is like arranging troops, primary medical institutions should be the first line, the first line is top, and then the second line, but in recent years, the focus of the work of primary medical institutions is public health, epidemic prevention and health care, and medical treatment capacity, especially the disposal capacity of new crown patients, 10,000 words are omitted here, and it is inconvenient to say more. The previous strategy for fever patients in primary care facilities was to refer them to the fever clinics of higher-level hospitals, but there were confirmed or suspected cases everywhere, and ambulances were enough? Are there enough referral staff?

Can the higher-level hospital finish the treatment? It is conceivable that hospitals above the second level will be overcrowded, and the outpatient clinics for fever and infection will be overflowing, and the inpatients and medical staff will also be panicked, and the hospital inpatients will be infected if they are indifferent. Some people say, don't we have infectious disease hospitals and shelter hospitals?

Do you think, if you let go, will those hospitals be enough? Are there enough medical staff?

How much does it cost to treat a disease? The incalculable astronomical amount will also be passed on to the medical insurance**, and the already fragile medical insurance system will also face a severe test. Now that the new crown ** is free, let go, can it still be free?

In addition, education, tourism, catering and other industries will face heavy blows! The only thing that can be relieved is the pension**, a large number of dead elderly people will reduce the burden of pensions, but who has no old people, we ourselves will get old, this result, are you willing to accept it?

It is a matter of time before the lockdown is lifted, but it is by no means now, because we have not yet figured out what we should do, it is difficult for us, it is even more difficult for the upper decision-makers, and in the stalemate stage, we can only hold on a little longer! ​

Do medical staff have the right to choose to escape, and then we answer the question, saying that there are corresponding consequences for evasion, of course, the consequences are not very serious. Is the focus on dodging? Wrong, the point is that the consequences of dodging are not serious, but people are not dodging!

So many medical staff immediately threw themselves into the front line of the virulent infectious disease! Why did the conversation deviate to criticize the medical staff for retreating, you tell me who flinched, it's interesting to set up a scarecrow to beat? Over the years, I have known a lot of people, and every time there is a major disaster recently, there are doctors I know who rush to the front line of rescue.

From Wenchuan, to Yushu, to Yunnan, in the early years, I was not qualified to rush to the front line to spill my blood, but I also did my best, and I still have a certificate in my cabinet.

Just last month, I was still reading the Nepal rescue diary sent by a friend of the same company every day on WeChat Moments - the hospital took over the task and arranged for him, and the family put down his young son and said he would go. Later he told me that the conditions there were unimaginably bad, and that the X-ray dose received in 7 days was more than 5 years of work combined due to ** need. However, from his circle of friends, what I see is glory, satisfaction, and of course, the daily longing for his family, seeing Dad miss you and Dad want to be the hero in your heart, tears in my eyes many times.

When I was an undergraduate, my uncle, who was a doctor at home, was also a foreign aid to the International Red Cross in a country, and in the first year he went, his colleague died of malaria in Africa. In addition to leaving his family, there is really a danger of dying in a foreign country. Do you think the remuneration is very high, but in fact, the salary of Huawei employees in their 30s who are in the same African country in the same year is about 500,000 yuan a year, and they are not even 1 3.

But he still stayed for 4 years, occasionally visiting relatives, during which his son did not come back until he went abroad for graduate school. The family is also as proud and supportive as ever. None of them were military doctors, they were all doctors in public hospitals, and they all signed up on their own at that time, so it was okay if they didn't go.

But they all went without hesitation.

No, if you dodge, you are not qualified to be a doctor, and it is the duty of a doctor to save lives and help the wounded.

We must treat the frontline medical staff during the epidemic with sufficient respect, obey their arrangements, and contribute our part when needed。Although the epidemic has been controlled in most areas, there are still some places where the epidemic has recurred, and medical staff are required to fight on the front line, testing nucleic acid tests for local residents overnight, treating confirmed patients, etc., the work is very hard, and the environment is quite bad.

1. Enough respect.

The most important thing for us in the face of medical staff is respect, they are angels who save lives and help the wounded, and give up their families to protect the personal and property safety of the people, their profession and behavior are very great, of course we must have enough respect for them.

2. Obey the arrangement.

During the epidemic, many places are relatively chaotic, and at this time, we must obey the arrangements of medical staff and do not cause trouble to them. For example, some low-quality citizens have conflicts with medical staff for their own selfish interests, and the two sides even fight, affecting their work, which is not only a moral issue, but has risen to the legal level, and in serious cases, they need to bear legal responsibility.

3. Contribute your own strength.

During the epidemic, many good people and good deeds emerged, such as an enthusiastic person who bought hundreds of catties of pork ribs to deliver to medical staff, and some restaurant owners made hot soup and delicacies to give to medical staff, so that they could feel a warmth on a cold night. In the summer, some citizens made homemade cooling bags with diapers, and in winter, some people sent quilts and jackets, all of which were contributing their own strength. The work of frontline medical staff is hard and dangerous, but their actions have touched countless people, which is why so many enthusiastic citizens have emerged, making us feel the warmth and positive energy of society.

It is not so difficult to insist on contributing to the epidemic, and sometimes we just need to do what we can to help them the most.

We should give full respect, they are very great in using their own time to fight the epidemic, and at the same time, we must obey their arrangements, control the epidemic as soon as possible, and treat the medical staff correctly, they have privileges, but they cannot have excessive privileges.

We should respect these health care workers. Try not to cause trouble to these medical staff, and cooperate with these medical staff when doing nucleic acid. If the conditions at home are better, you can also provide some help to these medical staff in life, you can provide some hot water to medical staff, and you can also provide some food to medical staff.

Take it seriously, and when they are in danger, we can reach out to them and provide them with supplies.

If I encounter the problem of recruiting new crown patients and testing ** drugs, I will apply on the basis of meeting the relevant conditions. ......Specifically, I need to be clear about my responsibilities, whether the test drug will cause harm to my body, and whether my personal circumstances can be adapted to the relevant requirements.

1. After clarifying the responsibilities that I need to perform, I will make my own choice.

Everything we do needs to meet the relevant conditions, fulfill the corresponding obligations and responsibilities. ......Therefore, in this matter, I also need to clarify this aspect. ......Specifically, I first had to clarify what kind of responsibilities I would have to perform if I participated in the trial, and I would make a final decision only after clarifying the relevant circumstances.

I'll only do it if I can do it.

2. If the drug experiment has no adverse effect on me, I will go to the trial.

Through drug trials, new drugs can be developed, **related diseases. So that's a good thing. ......However, drug testing may have some impact on physical health, and these factors must be considered on their own.

If it is clear that this will not affect my health, then I will actively participate in this matter and contribute to the development of new drugs.

3. I will make a final decision on whether to apply for the job based on my own high-end credit situation.

Whatever we do, we need to have the right qualifications. Specifically, your actual situation must meet the relevant requirements before you can do it. ......Therefore, in this matter, I should also analyze the actual situation of my own Qi Lun after understanding the relevant situation, and only after I know that my actual situation meets the relevant requirements and I can be competent for this matter, I will apply for the job and contribute to the research and development of new drugs.

However, if your actual situation cannot meet the relevant requirements, you can only choose to give up.