Is Open Book Really Beneficial 5, Is Open Book Really Beneficial

Uncoiling is certainly beneficial. No matter what kind of book you have, there are advantages, and the key lies in what you absorb. There is no need to doubt anything, as long as you read more, you will naturally absorb the excellent parts, there is nothing wrong with the book, the fault is only that the person who writes the book and the person who reads the book is different.

If you can keep reading, then it is best to read all kinds of books, and you don't have to care about the essence and the dross, because there is no fundamental difference between these things, because in different periods and under different conditions, there is no absolute boundary between right and wrong, and what is wrong at that time may be right at this time, and it may be correct at this time, and it may be wrong in the future. So reading a book is about knowing, not about finding an answer in it, you just need to know that this is the case.

The opening of the book is about reading, but it does not say that reading a good book, so the opening of the book is not necessarily beneficial.

Yes, if you read a good book, it goes without saying, if you read a bad book, you will also accept the things that make sense, and consciously reject the mistakes. Usually a book is written by intellectuals, who are more knowledgeable than the average person, and of course the reader will benefit.

Not necessarily, we must have a skeptical spirit when reading books, we must take the essence of it, and go to the bad rake.

Of course, it depends on what the volume opens.

It depends on what kind of roll it is.

It depends on a number of factors depending on your personal thoughts.

Not all of the books are right.

Words are always vivid and powerful, and words can record feelings and beauty. Books take us through different time and space, different scenes, burst out more shining points in sharing, whether it is life or work, we should strive to accept more new knowledge, learn more people's thoughts, keep the thought active and progressive, open the book is beneficial.

It is better to read thousands of dead books than to travel thousands of miles and see more and more.

This is a one-person society, and if you go to travel thousands of miles, it is better to meet many people.

If you go around and get to know many people, you may not get the gist of it, so it's better to let a famous person give you guidance.

No matter what the famous person says, it is better to comprehend it yourself.

It makes sense to put it in a certain range, but it is not absolute. The various aspects mentioned above are actually mutually causal and mutually reinforcing. In each aspect, there is another irreplaceable strength.

If you expand it, there will also be problems logically. So there's no need to go into detail.

In my opinion, this is just a way of speaking using foreshadowing, and the word "comprehension" should be highlighted in the end. In that regard, in the final analysis, "understanding" is your own. This kind of statement, just understand what it really wants to say, and do it.

For example, "three stinkers, one Zhuge Liang", can you study it in detail? The more you look into it, the more unclear it becomes. He is only emphasizing a general truth, it is better for everyone to come up with ideas together than to think alone. This is also a common phenomenon in life, and it is enough to understand this truth.

Reading thousands of books, traveling thousands of miles, reading countless people, and guiding the way by famous teachers are all external and external causes, and the most important thing must be to turn these external wisdom into our own things, which is "enlightenment". "Enlightenment" is thinking, understanding, and internal causes. A successful person must be a person who is good at thinking.

Open books are beneficial, as we all know, reading books can increase knowledge, can get us rid of ignorance, books are the ladder of human progress, reading makes us progress, so open books are beneficial.