-
Other people who eat and drink together are responsible. The responsibility of the deceased is the main one, knowing that he is drunk and cannot drive but committing the act increases his own risk, and the person who drinks with him has the obligation to stop but dissuade the obligation, and bears secondary liability, and the person who drinks with him is only liable for civil compensation at this time.
Legal analysisIn a drunk driving accident, the person who drank together is responsible. Whether the person who drinks together is liable depends on whether he or she acted in persuasion to the deceased; Generally speaking, the person who advises the other party will be judged to be at fault in the following situations: compulsive persuasion, persuading the other party to drink even though he knows that the other party cannot drink, failing to escort the drunk person home safely while knowing that the other party is drunk, and failing to dissuade drunk driving, resulting in a car accident and other damages; If there is a causal relationship between the above wrongful acts and death, you need to bear the liability for compensation; The person obligated to compensate the victim for personal injury, all expenses incurred due to medical treatment** and the loss of income due to lost work, including medical expenses, lost work expenses, nursing expenses, transportation expenses, accommodation expenses, hospital meal subsidies, and necessary nutrition expenses.
If the party is not clear about the friend's illegal act or the cause of the accident, then it is not liable, and the specific situation depends on the actual situation.
Legal basisCivil Code of the People's Republic of China
Article 1174:Where the harm is intentionally caused by the victim, the perpetrator is not liable.
Article 1175:Where the harm is caused by a third party, the third party shall bear tort liability.
Article 1176:Where voluntary participation in cultural or sports activities with a certain degree of risk is harmed by the conduct of other participants, the victim must not request that the other participants bear tort liability; However, this does not apply if other participants are intentionally or grossly negligent in causing the damage. The responsibilities of event organizers shall be governed by the provisions of Articles 1198 to 1201 of this Law.
-
In this case, if a friend at a drinking table is drinking, he should not be allowed to drink and drive a motor vehicle, if something happens, then the table is responsible.
-
A friend has a drunk driving accident, and it is easy to get rid of it when you drink at the same table. That is to say, if a friend drinks at a table, knowing that he is driving, he frequently raises his glass to persuade him to drink, or he knows that his friend has been drinking, but he does not stop driving after drinking, and he is responsible for drinking at the same table.
-
If a friend has a drunk driving accident, is it responsible for the people who drank together at the table? Yes, this is a new regulation in our country, if a friend drinks and has an accident, the person who drinks together at the table is responsible.
-
A friend was drunk driving and had a traffic accident, and the person who drank with him at the table was responsible. For this traffic accident, the party concerned is responsible for the accident, but when compensating, he should bear joint and several liability.
-
If a friend has an accident while driving drunk, of course the person who sits together is responsible, and if he drinks together, he should be jointly and severally liable for the accident compensation. In other words, if the parties are unable to make compensation, those who drink together should be jointly and severally liable for compensation.
-
Well, if your friend is involved in a traffic accident or other problem while driving drunk, then if it is a big matter and the other party's family takes your friend to court, then the person who drank with you must be responsible.
-
There is no responsibility for drinking together at the table. They are not responsible for the traffic accident caused by the driving of the nine households, but they are jointly and severally liable for the compensation for the traffic accident.
-
Friends drunk driving accident, the people who drink together at the table are responsible, are good friends to get together as much as possible not to drink, drinking must not drive, if everyone eats together someone by car, then persuade him not to drink, knowing that friends gather to eat and drink is indispensable, for the sake of safety, then we try not to drive, even if it is a taxi to you can be. Try not to discourage alcohol at the table, just eat and drink well, drink too much and hurt your body and face, it's not good for everyone, you say no.
-
Can you be specific, whether it is a unilateral accident or a tripartite accident, and if it is a tripartite accident, there is absolutely no responsibility, and the victim will claim power against the perpetrator but not against the person who drank together.
-
If held accountable. Everyone at the table is responsible. After all, you drank together. If you don't drink together. There will be no drunk driving. are all responsible. The person who organizes the dinner. Accounts for the main responsibility.
-
If a friend has an accident with a drunk driver, the person who drinks with him at the table is responsible if he knows that he can drive and drinks together, and if he is advised not to drink or asked not to drive after drinking, he is not responsible.
-
People who drink together are responsible, so now we can't persuade them to drink, pay attention to their health, and pay attention to safety.
-
At present, according to the law, if you drink at the same table, generally you should not discourage drinking, and if you persuade drinking, you may be jointly and severally liable for your friend's drunk driving. So now when drinking together, try to dissuade the other party from drunk driving, of course, the other party drinks by himself, and there will be nothing for you.
-
Your friend has a drunk driving accident, and the person who drinks with him at the table is not responsible, because drunk driving is his problem, he is already a fully capable person, and he has not taken care of himself.
-
Whether or not a person who drinks together in a car accident depends on whether the person who drinks together is at fault, and if you know that the other party can't drink and drive and doesn't dissuade you, resulting in an accident, you need to bear some responsibility.
-
This depends on the parties involved, as well as the opinions of the parties' families, if they are pursued, then your friends who drink together will need to bear some responsibility.
-
If a friend has a drunk driving accident, the person who drinks with him at the table is of course responsible. The law now has this provision.
-
If a friend has an accident after drinking, and the people who drink together at the table, is they responsible? This is responsible, because you should stop your friends from drinking and driving after drinking together.
-
First of all, you can't ask him to drink at the wine table, and secondly, after drinking, you have to persuade him not to drive, so that there is no responsibility.
-
I think you must be responsible for this, because if you don't drink, you won't have drunk driving accidents, so I think you are responsible.
-
As long as it is a drinker at the table, a person who persuades alcohol, etc., it can't get out of it.
-
You should also be responsible, because he drank alcohol, and you did not dissuade him not to drive.
-
He is not a child, he knows that he can't drive if he drinks, he should bear it himself, and others are not responsible.
-
If a friend has an accident while drunk and drives and drinks together at the table, there is no responsibility, but the friends who drink together in the compensation bear joint and several civil liability.
-
If there is no persuasion, there will be no responsibility.
-
Legal Analysis: The person who accompanied the drinker is not responsible, but if there is a traffic accident, or death, the person who accompanied the drinker is liable.
Legal basis: Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China Article 133-1 Anyone who drives a motor vehicle on the road in any of the following circumstances shall be sentenced to short-term detention and a concurrent fine:
1) Chasing and racing, where the circumstances are heinous;
2) Driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated;
C) engaged in school bus business or passenger transport, seriously exceeding the rated occupant capacity, or seriously exceeding the speed limit;
4) Transporting hazardous chemicals in violation of the regulations on the safety management of hazardous chemicals, and endangering public safety.
Where the owner or manager of a motor vehicle bears direct responsibility for the conduct in items (3) or (4) of the preceding paragraph, punishment is to be given in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
Where conduct in the preceding two paragraphs simultaneously constitutes other crimes, follow the provisions for the heavier punishment at trial and sentencing.
Threshold and test of blood and breath alcohol content of vehicle drivers》 Alcohol content threshold.
The threshold of blood alcohol content of vehicle drivers after drinking alcohol and early regret or drunk driving is shown in Table 1.
Table 1 Threshold of blood alcohol content of vehicle drivers.
Driving behavior category thresholds.
Driving behavior category threshold (mg 100ml).
Driving under the influence of alcohol is 20,<80
Driving while drunk 80
As a driver, he should know the truth of not driving when drinking, and not drinking when driving. This is his personal non-compliance with traffic rules, and he is solely responsible. There is no responsibility for drinking with him.
If you didn't do it, you don't need to be responsible. If you really feel guilty, buy something delicious and visit him.
will comfort, two people who love each other together, just don't cry, and they will care when they see their girlfriend in a bad mood. The first boyfriend is real, and I'm embarrassed to say sweet words. But he will also act to care for you and love you. Or the guy doesn't love you and is too lazy to talk to you.
Speed breakup, you don't be a third party.
But he's still with me. It shows that this man is not very responsible for his girlfriend either. >>>More
You should be right in this matter, love is like this, it is not something that people can control. If he can't catch up with himself, it can only mean that he is not attractive enough to that girl, and that girl likes you and is with you, which means that you compare your taste with that girl, and you should let your friends know that Bin is not that you are better than him or anything, but that your personal preferences are different. Don't hit his self-esteem, the boy's self-esteem is the strongest, and you had better be restrained in front of him, because no matter how light he pretends to be on the surface, she will still be uncomfortable in a short time, and it's best to let the girl go and tell your friend, if you say it, he will definitely not listen, let the girl say it first, and then you go to him to talk about your heart, saying that you didn't mean to rob him. >>>More