My friend has a head injury, and I am about to exercise together, do I have to take responsibility f

If you didn't do it, you don't need to be responsible. If you really feel guilty, buy something delicious and visit him.

If you are an adult, you should know the consequences, and you should bear the greatest responsibility, and the main thing is to see the cause of the accident.

My friend has a head injury, and I am about to exercise together, do I have to take responsibility for the accident? He went with you voluntarily, and if there is an accident, you don't have to take responsibility, but morally speaking, you should give him care and help.

If the injury is severe, you should all be held responsible, not if it is not serious.

You ask this question to prove that you are too selfish, and you will be okay if you think about yourself in advance? When someone is injured, what are you asking someone for? Do you treat people as friends?

Whether you are responsible or not depends on your attitude and performance, if I look at your performance, you are fully responsible! All kinds of compensation! I don't understand the world at all, and I just want to evade responsibility ......This matter is too easy to solve, for a reasonable person, as for people like you, there is no need to talk to you too much, you don't deserve friends!

It depends on the situation, and if his injuries are not directly related to or related to you, I don't think you need to be responsible.

If the parents of the friend are not held accountable, they are not responsible. If you are held accountable and prosecuted, you have to be responsible.

If you are at fault, you will be held responsible, and if you are not at fault, you will not be responsible.

Of course not, the law does not stipulate that friends should be jointly and severally liable if they have an accident.

Parents have to blame you, and you have to take some responsibility. It's fine if you don't call him.

Need. If you hadn't asked him or her out, something would have happened?

Legal Analysis: In principle, the principle is whether there is fault or not. 1. The biggest feature of self-help outdoor sports is that it has a certain risk.

Those who are still willing to participate knowing that there is a risk shall, in principle, bear the consequences of the aftermath of the fight. 2. The virtual stool activity is spontaneous and shall not be profit-making, otherwise, the organizer shall bear the corresponding legal responsibility.

Legal basis: "Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law and Elimination of Empty Elimination in the Trial of Personal Injury Compensation Cases" Article 4: Where natural persons, legal persons, or other organizations engaged in business activities such as lodging, catering, or entertainment, or other social activities, fail to fulfill their security obligations within reasonable limits, causing others to suffer personal injury, and the person entitled to compensation requests that they bear the corresponding liability for compensation, the people's court shall support it.

First, if this is not an employment relationship or an employment relationship, then it will not be liable for compensation for the harmful results caused by the members of the organization.

Second, from the perspective of the tort of personal injury, because neither party is at fault, the law does not provide for the application of the principle of no-fault rule in this regard. Then at most, the principle of fairness should be applied, 55 open.

Third, the final key is that this organization does not have the qualifications of a civil subject and does not have its own property. So this organization can't be held responsible, so what about the organizers, the question is what the organizers organized at that time, if the content is about extreme sports, then there is a responsibility to take on safety, if it's just a meeting and cleaning, then there is no responsibility. Because the other party is an adult, they have the ability to take responsibility for actions other than the content of the organization.