Why can t high speed rail develop abroad?

High-speed rail is a type of public transportation facility. High-speed rail, on the basis of trains, has increased speed, improved safety and stability, and also increased passenger capacity.

Basically, it can be said that high-speed rail is a high-tech product derived from time to time when public transportation such as trains can no longer meet the demand.

The reason why foreign high-speed railways cannot be developed, in fact, is very simple, that is, they don't need it.

First of all, Westerners have a strong sense of individualism. They don't have a lot of interest in public transport.

In contrast, they prefer to drive to their destination with one person and one car.

Therefore, it is not uncommon to find that in a foreign family, one family owns four or five cars. It's because each member of their team needs to have their own car.

The existence of cars abroad is like the existence of bicycles in China. It is an indispensable means of transportation in life.

For long-distance travel, foreigners are more inclined to choose airplanes.

Foreign planes are welcomed by the masses because of the short security check time and convenient ride.

If you are taking a domestic flight in a foreign country, you only need to arrive at the airport almost 20 minutes in advance, and you can complete all the formalities and board the plane smoothly. This is almost unthinkable at home.

Because of the large domestic passenger flow and frequent travel, the means of transportation such as trains and airplanes cannot meet the passenger needs of the masses. This is the further generation of high-speed rail.

And abroad, they don't have such a high demand for passenger transport, and one plane has already done all the public transportation.

And foreigners do not have the custom of Chinese, and they must go home after the Mid-Autumn Festival. This further reduces the pressure on their public transport.

Therefore, the lack of demand is the main reason why foreign high-speed rail cannot develop.

With the rapid development of the world economy, transportation has become particularly important, China as a populous country, the investment in natural transportation is relatively large, and the transportation construction belongs to public infrastructure, the state directly invests in the construction, so China's high-speed rail development in the world is second to none. So why can't foreign high-speed rail develop, let's take the United States as an example to analyze this problem:

1.As a capitalist country, the United States implements a federal system, and if it wants to build high-speed rail, which is an infrastructure that costs manpower, material resources and financial resources, it must be supported by the states, and they are unwilling to invest tax money in it, they believe that high-speed rail is a private construction, and it is not worth spending so much manpower, material and financial resources to build. And the Americans are particularly serious about protecting the land, believing that the construction of high-speed rail is a waste of land and destroys resources.

2.Due to the construction of high-speed rail, a lot of land needs to be wasted, in the United States land is private, not like China's land belongs to the state, if the country builds infrastructure, only need to pay a certain amount of compensation, and the United States is different, if you occupy citizens' land, you must get the consent of citizens, and also pay a high amount of compensation, and this is a sky-high compensation, ** will not spend so much money to support.

3.With the rapid development of the U.S. economy and the rapid development of the aircraft manufacturing industry, people can travel by plane, and the plane is relatively fast, and the ticket price of high-speed rail in the United States is still relatively expensive, and people would rather take a plane or drive a private car. In addition, the cost of high-speed rail is also high, it requires a lot of manpower to build, and the wages of American workers are also very high, which is a lot of expenses.

Therefore, I think this is the reason why high-speed rail cannot be developed abroad, although it is only a description of the United States, but I think it can be judged as a standard.

Now our country's high-speed rail is developing rapidly, and it can be the fastest and most stable country in the world. But why can't other countries except China and Japan develop high-speed rail? It stands to reason that such a good thing should not be, so I'm going to give my opinion on this issue here.

First of all, high-speed rail is a commodity for the people of various countries, and we will talk about it according to the ** and demand. First of all, the first aspect, that is, technology, first of all, our country can independently develop high-speed rail, while other countries, including some developed countries, do not have a good research and development for this type of technology, and the cost of high-speed rail is more than twice that of ordinary railways, such a high cost, it is really not necessary for foreign countries, first of all, high-speed rail and other livelihood projects in foreign countries are contracted by private enterprises, not to mention whether foreign countries have this ability of enterprises, even if there is such ability, The investment in railway engineering is too large to withstand this huge consumption, but the return is too slow for these enterprises, so few countries are willing to build high-speed rail, which is why foreign high-speed rail cannot be developed.

Let's talk about the demand for high-speed rail in foreign countries, our country vigorously builds high-speed rail because most of our country's urban construction is clustered together, and the cities need to be very closely connected with each other, so the demand for high-speed rail is very high, and the geographical conditions of our country determine the demand for high-speed rail, our country has a vast territory, the gap between the north and the south is very large, the previous railway is too slow, can not meet the current people's demand for speed, but in foreign countries, most countries are not like our country, There is no such big territory as ours, so why use high-speed rail for things that can be solved by cars? It's not overkill. And I think that countries like the United States and Canada are all countries with developed roads, so they don't like railways very much.

Moreover, the aviation development in the United States has been quite mature, and the demand for high-speed rail, although it is also very fast, is not so great. And the United States is poor, so why not let the enterprise contract? Most of these enterprises have already contracted aeronautical projects, and if they build high-speed rail, they will not shoot themselves in the foot, and no one will be so stupid.

So the reason why foreign high-speed rail can't be developed.

There are high-speed railways abroad. Japan's famous Shinkansen is the high-speed rail, which has been around since the 80s of the last century. In Europe, Germany, France, Britain and other capitalist powers, high-speed rail has long existed.

The United States and Canada in North America are special, first of all, due to the developed aviation industry, coupled with the extremely high penetration rate of private cars, the free highway network extends in all directions, and the medium and long-distance travel has been perfectly solved, so the demand for high-speed rail is relatively unnecessary. In addition, the construction of high-speed rail will definitely move the cake of the aviation industry, so the demand is not large, and it is difficult to shake the existing mainstream transportation pattern, and the high-speed rail and even the entire railway construction in North America are relatively conservative.

Foreign high-speed railways, different from China's high-speed railways, reflect the important information of foreign high-speed railways. High-speed rail standards: In 1962, the International Union of Railways, an early European organization, designated the speed of 200 kilometers per hour for the reconstruction of old lines and the speed of 250-300 kilometers per hour for new ones. The 1985 Geneva Agreement made new provisions:

The speed of the new passenger and freight co-linear high-speed railway is more than 250 kilometers per hour, and the speed of the new passenger dedicated high-speed railway is more than 350 kilometers per hour.

I think each region is different, maybe it just doesn't feel like it's needed, the United States is a big country, and there is really no military danger in general, and the United States is high-speed and free.

I think the topography and geographical location of each place, as well as the standard of living and so on.

Because for the United States, most of his life is very, that is, a state of relaxation, because many of it are farms, but there are a lot of planes in people, so people rarely go to see high-speed rail because they have a lot of planes, because this geographical location is not good.

High-speed rail occupies a lot of land and has a high cost, while the United States has a small population and many airports, and the plane is more convenient, faster, economical and practical than high-speed rail.

People's roads are fully equipped, they are all highways and there are no tolls extending in all directions, there is no need to build that expensive thing.

Legal analysis: First, the United States does not have a household registration system, with a population of only 300 million people, and various social resources are relatively scattered, and residents can move freely and live in a relatively scattered manner, unlike China, which is affected by the Spring Festival. Therefore, the Americans put a lot of effort into building high-speed rail, and even if it is built, not many people will sit on it, and the gains will outweigh the losses at that time.

Second, the highway system and aviation system in the United States are very developed, and most of the private trips are driven by private cars, and there is no toll on the highway, and you can reach anywhere in the United States as soon as you step on the accelerator, which is more practical than high-speed rail.

In China, high-speed rail is built for convenient travel, convenient and fast.

Legal basis: Railway Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 33 Railway development plans shall be formulated in accordance with the needs of national economic and social development and national defense construction, and shall be coordinated with other modes of transportation development plans。

Article 34 The construction plan of local railways, special railways and special railway lines must conform to the national railway development plan and obtain the consent of the competent railway department or the agency authorized by the competent railway department.

Article 35 Within the scope of the urban planning area, the planning of railway lines, stations, hubs and other relevant facilities shall be incorporated into the overall planning of the city where it is located.

The planning of land for railway construction shall be included in the overall land use plan. The land needed for long-term expansion and new railways shall be arranged by the people at or above the county level in the overall land use plan.

Summary. Kiss <>

I am glad to answer for you, the development of high-speed rail abroad is the <> Serbia officially entered the ranks of high-speed rail countries and opened a new era of high-speed rail in the Balkans

<> as China's first high-speed EMU exported to foreign countries, the Jakarta-Bandung high-speed railway adopts Chinese technology, Chinese standards and Chinese equipment, and is the first full-system high-speed railway in China.

The development of high-speed rail abroad.

Kiss <>

I am glad to answer for you, the development of high-speed rail abroad is the <> Serbia has officially entered the high-speed rail country and opened a new era of high-speed rail in the Balkans

<>As China's first high-speed EMU Zhenghe group exported to foreign countries, the Jakarta-Bandung high-speed railway adopts Chinese technology, Chinese standards and Chinese equipment, and is the first full-system high-speed railway in China.

Expansion: China's high-speed railway has two meanings: China's high-speed railway, which is technically standard, refers to the new passenger dedicated line railway designed to run 250 km-hour (including reserved) and above EMU trains in the People's Republic of China several times at a speed-up and the initial operating speed is not less than 200 km-h; China's high-speed railway network refers to all new railways with a design speed of 200 km h or more and some existing railways after renovation to meet the standards.

Big Red Socks Huai] <>

<> China's high-speed rail has three major advantages: advanced technology, safety and reliability; **Low, cost-effective; The operation has been proven to be abundant, and the standards of each railway built in China are guaranteed to be at least 20 years old. [Da Ming wide safflower] <>

China's infrastructure development has attracted the attention of the world, and the speed of development has made the Chinese people more and more proud. In particular, China's development in transportation, for example, China's high-speed rail is at the leading level in the world, high-speed rail has brought great convenience to people's daily travel, not only that, but the potential value of high-speed rail cannot be ignored. If high-speed rail spreads all over the country, it can stimulate the economic development of the whole country, especially for the more backward regions.

However, the United States, as a superpower, has been greatly hindered in the development of high-speed rail, mainly for the following reasons. <>

The United States is a capitalist country, and unlike China, every inch of land in the United States is privately owned, so even if they want to finance the construction of high-speed rail, the owners of these lands may not agree to this approach. If the land is forcibly expropriated, it is likely to cause greater social contradictions, which will make the price paid very large. Americans prefer to travel by car, and highways are more developed, so building high-speed rail also seems less necessary.

The United States has a federal system, and each state has a large degree of autonomy between them, so it is likely that there are big differences in policies between the two states. The construction of high-speed rail requires the same opinion among various states, which is more difficult, so the United States ** is not enthusiastic about building high-speed rail. <>

Finally, the United States is also relatively scarce in high-speed rail technology. Although the United States is a country with a lot of cutting-edge technology and many high-tech talents, it is in a vacant state in the field of high-speed rail construction. Therefore, even if the United States has the idea of developing high-speed rail, the United States does not have enough capabilities and technology to do so.

This makes shipping in the United States more developed now, and people generally choose to take an air plane when traveling remotely. At the same time, the population of the United States is much smaller than that of China, so there is not as much movement of people, which is likely to lead to a relatively low occupancy rate of high-speed rail, so it will not be able to reap enough benefits.