Does a married woman have the right to interfere with her children s property?

In fact, no matter whether they are married or not, as long as their children are adults and have the ability to live independently, parents have no right to interfere with their children's affairs.

As for the issue of children's property that you mentioned, it depends on whether the children's property includes the contributions of the parents, for example, the real estate or other items purchased by the parents with a part of the contributions, which is not interference, but has the right to take it back.

In fact, it is difficult to break down the property disputes between children and parents, because the blood relationship is inseparable, and the best solution is for everyone to sit down calmly and negotiate together. If the family relationship is damaged because of money, it is actually a loss for both parties.

Although it is said that the lives of children are brought by their parents, this must not be a reason to blackmail their children into compliance, after all, parents will also grow old, and if they are very stiff, who will provide for their parents to provide for their old age?

If you can divide your property well, even if it's good, why interfere with your children's property? The property of the child is acquired by him, and you have no right to interfere.

It depends on the reason why children have the obligation to give money to their parents, so that their parents can provide for their old age and live, and they cannot use marriage as an excuse not to give their parents their due obligations.

Your children are married, and you have no legal right to interfere with their property. You are no longer obligated to raise your children, but your children are obligated to support you in old age.

It is not possible to interfere with the property of children, because when the children reach the age of 18, they are already adults, and adults are equal. Rights and obligations at this time. But as a parent, you can give suggestive and reasonable advice.

Only on their property. Suggestive. Guide.

Of course, there is no right, since the children are married, that is, they are adults, and in law, they belong to the capable people, and no one, including parents, has the right to interfere with property and other issues!

Of course, there is no right to interfere with the property of the child. Of course, children also have the obligation to be filial to their parents. Please do your part and do your own thing. The elders set a good example for the younger ones. Good family style is the traditional virtue of China!

Hello, don't interfere so as not to hurt your feelings, after all, your children are married and have their own small families, and besides, they must have their own ideas.

Now that the children are married, they are adults, and in law, they belong to the capable people, and no one has the right to interfere with property and other issues!

Naturally, this has no right to interfere.

The property of children is their private property, and no one has the right to interfere with or dispose of their private property, including their parents, who are suspected of committing an offence if they interfere by force.

It is possible to give advice but not to interfere with the property of the child, aqui te amo.

Parents do not have the right to dispose of property, and the consent of the child is required to obtain the property of the child.

The children are already older, and the parents have to worry too much, but if the children don't know how to live a good life and spend money indiscriminately, the parents can remind them, but in the end, it is still up to the children to say, after all, the property belongs to the children.

I don't think your children have the right to interfere with their property since they are married. Because they have the right to dispose of their own property, and we don't need to worry about it.

The children are married, and as parents, I think we have no right to interfere with the property of our children, we can only say some opinions and make an idea, and the children will let them go if they don't listen?

Of course, there is no right to interfere, not to mention that the children are married, even if they are not married, the children's property is personal, and others have no right to interfere, including the parents.

There is no right to interfere with children, as long as they are at least 16 years old, and they have reached the level of completeness. When you are a person with civil capacity, you have no right to interfere with your children's property and other lives, otherwise you will already be suspected of violating the law.

A married child does not have the right to interfere with the child's property.

No, if it is given by a woman, it is.

When a child reaches adulthood, the parents are not obliged to raise it, so they have no right to interfere with the property of the child, let alone if they are married.

Of course, there is no power to interfere.

I think that since you are someone else's child, you have already ordered and ordered, that is, you can't interfere with your children's property, first of all, you have your own property, and your parents have not interfered.

Hello friend, your children have already started a family, that is, you have no right to interfere with your children's property, you can only make a suggestion to your children, but you can't interfere.

After all, it is the parents, and the opinions of the parents should be listened to! To make a big decision, you should talk to your parents!

I don't think you have any right to interfere with your children's property when they get married, because they have their own family and they need to dispose of their own property.

Children have no right to interfere with their parents' property, and parents have the right to freely distribute their own Bright Oak property. The lawful private property of citizens shall not be infringed upon, and private property shall be protected by law, and no one can interfere with it, not even biological children, nor shall they have the right to interfere with the disposition of their parents' property. Citizens' personal property, including citizens' income, houses, savings, daily necessities, cultural relics, libraries, forests, livestock and means of production permitted by law, and other legal property.

Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

The lawful property of private individuals is protected by law, and no organization or individual is prohibited from encroaching, looting, or destroying it.

Constitution of the People's Republic of China

Article 13. The lawful private property of citizens is inviolable.

The State protects citizens' private property rights and inheritance rights in accordance with the provisions of law.

The State may, in accordance with the provisions of law, expropriate or expropriate citizens' private property and compensate them for the needs of the public interest.

Hello dear, I am asking the legal advice substitute teacher, I am glad to answer for you! Children do not have the right to interfere with their parents' property and private property is protected by law. No one can interfere!

Even biological children have no right to interfere with the disposition of their parents' property. Article 13 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China stipulates that citizens' lawful private property shall not be infringed upon. Private property is protected by law, and no one can interfere, not even biological children, who have the right to interfere with the disposal of the property of the father and mother.

Dear, I hope mine will be helpful to you, and I wish you a happy life! 

Article 13: Elderly care for the elderly is based on the home, and family members shall respect, care for, and care for the elderly.

Article 14: Supporters shall perform their obligations to provide financial support, daily care, and spiritual comfort to the elderly, and take care of the special needs of the elderly. Supporters refer to the children of the elderly and other persons who have the obligation to support them in accordance with the law. The spouse of the supporter shall assist the supporter in fulfilling the maintenance obligation.

Article 15: Supporters shall ensure that the sick elderly receive timely care and care; For the elderly who have financial difficulties, medical expenses shall be provided. For the elderly who are unable to take care of themselves, the caregiver shall bear the responsibility of care; Where they cannot take care of them in person, they may entrust others or elderly care establishments to take care of them in accordance with the wishes of the elderly.

Article 16 Supporters shall make proper arrangements for the housing of the elderly, and shall not force the elderly to live in or move to houses with poor conditions. Children or other relatives must not encroach on the housing owned or rented by the elderly, and must not change the property rights or lease relationship without authorization. The caregiver has the obligation to maintain the housing owned by the elderly.

Article 17: Supporters have the obligation to cultivate or entrust others to cultivate the fields contracted by the elderly, and to take care of or entrust others to take care of the elderly's forests and livestock, and the proceeds belong to the elderly.

Article 18: Family members shall care about the spiritual needs of the elderly, and must not neglect or neglect the elderly. Family members who live separately from the elderly should visit or greet the elderly frequently. The employer shall, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State, guarantee the right of the supporter to take leave for family visits.

Article 19 A supporter may not refuse to perform his or her obligation to support him on the grounds of renunciation of his right of inheritance or other reasons. If the supporter fails to perform the maintenance obligation, the elderly person has the right to demand that the supporter pay alimony. The caregiver shall not require the elderly to undertake work beyond their means.

Article 20: With the consent of the elderly, the supporters may sign an agreement on the performance of the maintenance obligation. The content of the maintenance agreement must not contravene the provisions of the law and the wishes of the elderly.

Legal basis

Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 1067: [Parents' Obligation to Support and Obligation to Support Children]Where parents do not perform their obligation to support, minor children or adult children who are unable to live independently have the right to demand that their parents pay child support. Parents who fail to fulfill their obligation to support their adult children, or who lack the ability to work or who have difficulties in living, have the right to demand maintenance from their adult children.

Article 1074: [Obligation to Support and Support Between Grandparents] Grandparents who can afford it have the obligation to support their minor grandchildren whose parents have died or whose parents are unable to support them.

Grandchildren who can afford it have the obligation to support their grandparents who have died or whose children are unable to support them.

Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China:

Article 261:Refusal to support an elderly or young, sick, sick person, or other person who has an obligation to support him, and the circumstances are heinous, is to be sentenced to up to five years imprisonment, short-term detention, or controlled release. This article is a specific provision for the crime of desertion.

The above is the relevant knowledge of "what are the legal provisions for supporting the elderly".

1. Under normal circumstances, the house is the joint property of your grandmother and your grandfather, and under normal circumstances, in addition to the one and a half houses enjoyed by your grandmother, the remaining one and a half houses are divided equally between your grandmother and her four children. 2. Your grandmother can only make a will to the second grandson only for this part of the house, of course, this must also be dealt with after the end of the inheritance, 3, the first inheritance can be waived, but it is generally required to be carried out in writing, and it must also be carried out before the completion of the division of the estate, 4, as for the validity of the will, as long as the basic elements are met, of course, this generation, 5, whether the premarital property notarization has been done does not affect the personal attributes of the secondary property, unless otherwise agreed between the parties, 6, If there is a relationship of dependency, the right of inheritance is established.

It is basically agreed that inheritance cases are more complicated and relevant evidence must be provided for any circumstance.

I see, thank you.