When a patriarchal family meets a feminist family, does patriarchal and feminist exist?

Women need to be tolerated and cared for.

If both of them are the kind of people who are very strong, then the man should give way to the woman.

Even if she doesn't do it right, don't argue with her, say it calmly.

Sympathy! It seems that no one can do without anyone, but there seems to be another wall in between. Men's rights and women's rights don't seem to be problems that can be solved by one person's compromise! It is recommended that two people be together to calm down and be serious for a while.

In fact, love has nothing to do with male power and women's rights With the maintenance of love, the conflict can be solved No matter how much you fight, you need to communicate peacefully with him, not to quarrel, two people put the problem on the table, rational analysis and solution, for love, for happiness, all problems will be solved, to have information about your own love, to have information about his love, to have information about your love, to trust your love 100%.

In fact, if nothing has started It is recommended not to choose a family with a conflict between thinking and your own family This is not a problem that love can solve Even if you love deeply, you will always be diluted by quarrels Always remember that marriage is never a matter of just two people Even if it is a problem of only two people The concept of more than 20 years is by no means a complete run-in between you in a year or two Even if you run in before marriage There are still many conflicts that you don't know after marriage need to be run-in For example, I don't recommend this so-called complementary marriage Because it's too tiring.

People who are influenced by patriarchal culture (level) generally have a kind of "helping themselves (Fang) and not helping (Fang) to think about filial piety". For example, their gender (change country, ethnicity, different groups apply.) Because patriarchal influence is universal) is generally like this:

1.Feminist male power does not exist. Even if there is male power, it is only a gender difference, not a power.

Nor can the sexes be truly equal. 2.Under the above premise, both sexes must speak for their own interests.

Therefore, women who are not feminists are natural women, and men who participate in women's rights are "turtles" of women's rights.

However, there is a deep-rooted hierarchical mentality of male power. It has caused endless discrimination, strife, wars and difficult peace talks in the world. Because:

1.As long as it is fair, there is no conflict between human rights in terms of differences, contradictions, and competition. Even people in the same group (or even the same person) will have relative differences in contradiction and competition (the same person, that is, to reflect and change beyond oneself).

It's the same as running the same line, people with different conditions can compete with each other, but they can't cheat. Therefore, power is the unjust behavior that ignores objective differences and supports cheating. 2.

In summary(1), because there are objective differences between people, people's interests (including power) plans are also different. So, even in a male-powering environment. Nor will all people support their own group of origin (cultural power) without differences.

For example, the female group (generally) does not support women's rights very much (which is why men's rights are enduring for a long time). Then among the patriarchal women, there are many people who maliciously insult feminism and other women ("I am a woman and a woman"), in fact, they do not deny themselves personally, but want to prove that they are superior to their "native sex", so as to share part of the power of men (if the sex gene can be changed, they would have changed their sex). At the same time, some men in the male group do participate in the development of women's rights.

However, this does not mean that they do not identify with their own group. It's that there is too much influence on male power, and people are also talking about social injustice. For example, some men also believe that the use of "he" to refer to the human group, and the derogatory word next to the word "female" is a manifestation of the influence of patriarchal injustice.

Another example is that some men have also taken into account the protection of women's rights and interests when participating in the revision of national laws. These are initiatives that are beneficial to social groups. What's more, the genetic evolution of the sex of human beings (including other creatures) has been decided, and men are inherently good.

Those who sell their mothers for snobbery are the reactionaries who incite social antagonism and the "turtle sons" of male power

exists, and the contradictions are universal.