The child has a fever and is on leave. The customer in the store paid for it. The performance was no

Not breaking the law. If you ask for leave, then the performance generated by the store during your leave has nothing to do with you, so the performance is not given to you, and it is not illegal.

Your child has a fever and takes leave, and the customers in the store pay for it, but the performance is not given to you, I don't think it is illegal, because although you pay the store to work, other salespeople work, so the performance should be counted on the other salespeople.

If the child has a fever and asks for leave, then there is no performance, and it is not okay not to give it to you, which is illegal, because when you work in the store, you must have performance, and he deducts your performance, you can find the Labor Bureau.

Actually, I personally don't think it's illegal, because you pay for the customer in the store after you ask for leave, because it has nothing to do with you.

Who the child has a fever and the child has a fever and asks for leave, and the customer in the store pays for it. The performance was not given to you, and I don't think it should be a crime. Because you are on leave and did not go to work.

I only asked for leave with a fever, and the customers in the store consulted about the performance, but I didn't give it to you, of course, it wasn't a solution, so that he did have violations.

The child has a fever and asks for leave, and the customers in the store pay for it, but the performance is not given to me, is it illegal? I don't think it's illegal, but it's a bit excessive, so you can talk to him.

The child has a fever and asked for leave, and the customers in the store also paid for it, and the performance was not given to you, I think it is not normal, there should be your performance.

What is the logical relationship between you?

If you have a fever and are sick, what money does the customer pay.

How performance relates to it.

There is no illegal issue.

It's not illegal! A sale and purchase transaction is a voluntary act of both parties, and it is the fundamental right of one party to express or otherwise express its unwillingness to trade. No matter what big thing you do, if he doesn't sell you, it shows that you don't have any relationship. And it didn't hurt your interests.

It is illegal to buy and sell, and it is not illegal not to buy or sell, unless a sales contract has been signed in advance.

This is not illegal, and the buyer and seller are voluntary. Of course, monopoly industries are different.

It's not illegal, but it's annoying.

Don't be angry.

It's not the same to buy somewhere else.

Illicit. These are two legal relationships, the money owed by the boss to you is a labor relationship, and if you accept the customer's money and do not give it, then it is suspected of embezzlement and is a criminal case.

You must be a crime, because it is one thing for the boss not to pay you a salary, if you intercept the customer service of other people's companies and do not give it to the company, you are a crime. So you can't do that.

If it is illegal, the gain of doing so outweighs the loss!

It's not a crime, but because of his harmony and wealth, since he is going to leave, don't care about his attitude.

This is a civil dispute, just like a quarrel between two people on the street.

No one can panic in the fever test, and eating more chocolate will cause a little body heat, but it will not be able to fight the level of fever.

You can take a cold shower yourself and put something on your face.

Analysis:

Hello, sue you for the guidance that the hospital is now not able to issue a fake sick note:

If you just write it yourself, without the hospital's stamp, your leaders will not believe it to be true.

Just take the certificate from the hospital.

You must have a doctor's leave certificate.