Should the property of the elderly be divided among the children or kept for the elderly? The three

The property of the elderly can be left to their own retirement, but they can divide the property to their children after a hundred years, after all, when they are old, it is the children who take care of their old age, and the children also handle the aftermath for themselves.

In fact, you should still keep it for your own retirement first, because don't rely on your own children to support yourself.

Although it is said that children are the closest people to them, people's hearts will change.

Legal analysis: After the death of the elderly, how to distribute the estate, in accordance with the laws and regulations, should be distributed in the following order: 1. Confirm whether the elderly have left a will or bequest agreement, and if so, give priority to the distribution of property in accordance with the testamentary agreement; 2. If not, the property in the first line of legal inheritance shall be equally distributed, or the proportion of the distribution of the amount of the concubine between the heirs, and the first priority shall be spouses, children, and parents; 3. If there is no first priority, the heir will be determined by the second priority, and the second priority will have siblings, grandparents, and maternal grandparents.

Legal basis: Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 1123: After the commencement of inheritance, it shall be handled in accordance with the statutory succession; If there is a will, it shall be handled in accordance with the testamentary inheritance or bequest; Where there is a bequest and maintenance agreement, it shall be handled in accordance with the agreement.

Article 1127 Inheritance shall be inherited in the following order:

1) First order: spouse, children, parents;

2) Second order: siblings, grandparents, maternal grandparents.

After the inheritance begins, it is inherited by the first-order heirs, and the second-order heirs do not inherit; If there is no first-order heir, the second-order heir shall inherit.

For the purposes of this Part, the term "children" includes legitimate children, children born out of wedlock, adopted children and dependent stepchildren.

For the purposes of this Part, the term "parents" includes biological parents, adoptive parents and step-parents in a dependent relationship.

The term "brothers and sisters" as used in this Part includes brothers and sisters of the same parents, half-brothers and sisters, brothers and sisters who are adoptive, and step-brothers and sisters who have a relationship of support.

Article 1130:The share of inheritance inherited by heirs in the same order shall generally be equal.

Heirs who have special difficulties in living and lack the ability to work shall be taken care of when distributing the inheritance.

Heirs who have fulfilled the main obligation to support the decedent or who live with the decedent may receive more than one share of the inheritance when the inheritance is distributed.

If an heir who has the ability and the capacity to support does not fulfill his obligation to support, the inheritance shall be distributed without or less.

Where the heirs agree through consultation, it may also be unequal.

<> for myself, I also have my own considerations about this issue. ......Specifically, my thoughts include three options: leaving the inheritance to my children, leaving the inheritance to my lover and lover, and leaving the inheritance to the person you trust the most when the children are not filial. 1. Leaving my inheritance to my children is my first choice.

For the vast majority of people, leaving their inheritance to their children after their death is the most common and common option. ......Children represent the future, hold their own hopes, and are also the people closest to them. Therefore, when you die, it is a logical choice to leave your inheritance to your children, which is your first choice for inheritance.

2. In order to let his lover spend his old age in peace, he will consider giving the inheritance to his lover. For himself, the lack of silver lover who has been with him for a lifetime is the most reluctant thing for him. Being able to let your lover live happily and happily is my greatest expectation.

Therefore, when you die, giving your inheritance to your lover is one of the most realistic choices. Doing so will make your lover live out his old age after his death, and he will feel very happy about it, so it is also an important choice for himself. 3. If the children are not filial, they will consider giving their inheritance to the person they trust the most.

In addition to the above two options, leaving your inheritance to the people you trust the most is also one of the realistic options you consider. ......This person I trust the most must be my immediate family member, but may be a friend of my own, or a person who is not related to him but knows him very well and trusts ......When you die, you will feel most at ease when you give your inheritance to such a person. ......If your children are not filial, you will make such a choice.

Doing so will put yourself at ease.

I think: you can leave it alone.

First of all, in the case of the child as an adult.

The children have not fulfilled their filial piety, and there is no need to pay them.

I believe that when our children have reached adulthood, we leave property to them because they support what we have. (Of course, even if you don't have property, you should blindly support the elderly) Therefore, I define the auspicious property as "remuneration", so since there is no such filial piety responsibility as rationality, the elderly can also not stay in the property. After all, the child is an adult and enough to support himself.

Secondly, in the case of minors.

If the children are still minors, then in the case of unfilial piety, adults need to be good at guiding. And you should also reflect on yourself, whether your own behavior has brought a bad influence to your child.

In the end, communication is the solution.

Whether they are adults or not, their children are their own flesh and blood. Even if they are not filial, but the property is not left to them, which is something that every parent is not very willing to do. This requires both of you to sit down and have a good talk and try to reach a situation where you can have both.