How is the object of thought possible

Target? In other words, how is it possible to know at the level of being, this possibility is what Heidegger's "Kant and Metaphysical Problems" refers to as the "synthesis of reality", that is, the possibility of the synthesis of knowledge and sensibility, and the synthesis of reality must be used as the basis of the possibility of innate comprehensive judgment, this is one of the core problems of the "Critique of Pure Reason", I will go into this question in detail, but because of many revisions and improvements, the organizational structure is a bit messy, so let's make do with it.

First of all, knowledge is grasped as judgment in Kant, and in contrast, knowledge is also presented in the form of propositions, which was also mentioned in the previous article. Thus the question of the possibility of knowing, or the possibility of judgment, is nothing more than 1: the possibility of the object of judgment.

2: The possibility of judging the principle. 3：

The principle of judgment and the affinity of the object. Let's start with a rough description of these 3 points:

For the first point, how is the object of judgment possible? Because we have always been in a circle full of objects, and we have to receive them. Sensibility is the inherent form of passive receptivity, in this sense, the senses are necessary, if a person does not have senses, he will face a completely dark world, so the possibility of the object is also the necessity of being given the sense, the necessity of the existence of the object is the introverted necessity of the object for the object, so the introduction of 'refutation of idealism' is actually an objective idealism, which is still fundamentally subjective and intellectual.

And in terms of the principle of judgment. We can conceive of the appearance acquired by the various senses when sensual materials are given to us, without the guidance of principles.

The subject-object theory holds that ideological and political education is a basic category composed of educators and educated, and educators are those who have been trained and trained in the field, and are the organizers, undertakers, and implementers of ideological and political education. In the process of ideological and political education.

It's that sometimes people's minds change others, I think it's impossible, everyone has everyone's thoughts, and their own will is the center!

The object of thought is a concept, which means that we cannot always carry the subject in our thoughts, but must analyze it from the perspective of the object.

In any case, I think that the subject of thinking is the direction of rights and obligations.

Thinking about the customer, maybe this is based on your personal ideology and morality, and he is based on his personal level.

If you want to think about the subject, it is definitely possible, it is entirely possible.

To put it mildly, of course, it would be nice to pass a subject and then transfer it to an ontological aspect, so that he can be transformed.

Hello, if you actually think about this thing, everyone is different, and it is ever-changing, maybe you don't know what you will think of in the next moment.

How is it possible to stop learning about the ideological topic, how is it possible to talk about the ideological topic, or is there an impossibility.

Since the research group may want to use your Marxist theory according to it, it is enough to mainly deal with it.

The lecture style is actually a relatively new idea, and they can be used as a carrier level!

What are the ideological issues? It may be that I should be above board in my thinking because of the topic of my thinking.

There are so many reasons why the object of thought could be, and these things are so normal that there really can't be a way to react.

So how can you think that this is a certain quality and blew up, they are still equipped, for this is still counted, and then hurt me to see.

Thoughts, his subject is starting to be black, and I think he has a certain choice and something to do if he can.

What do you say about ideological issues? Everyone has a standard in their hearts, and you just need to do your standard well.

How can the ideological subject be possible, and how can the object of thought be the master of the ideological class.

The so-called objective existence of the object is to put aside the influence of subjective cognition as much as possible to understand the object.

However, this is a kind of maximum, but it cannot be truly and absolutely.

The moment people perceive things, the moment they interact with information, they irreversibly distort objects in multiple dimensions such as inherent experience, way of thinking, and way of receiving information.

River and sea of it

The law of mass exchange: that is, the change of things is divided into qualitative change and quantitative change, in which it is the qualitative change of things that changes the nature of things, and it is the quantitative change of things that causes the change of the quantity or spatial position of things. Quantitative change leads to qualitative change, and quality leads to the occurrence of new quantitative change.

Qualitative change and quantitative change are the relationship of dialectical unity.

There are two aspects of affirmation and negation in everything, and their contradictory movements promote the development and change of things. Negation is the self-negation of things that is achieved through the internal contradictory movement of things, and it is "self-movement", self-development. Dialectical negation is realized through exaltation and renunciation, which is the link of connection and development.

The development of things is not accomplished through a dialectical negation, but through the basic process of two leaps and three stages of the negation stage of the affirmation stage - the negation stage - the negation stage of the negation. The negation stage of negation makes the development of things appear as if it were a movement back to the starting point, and the progressive nature of the development of things is expressed through twists and turns. The law of negation of negation shows that the development process of things is not a linear motion composed of the addition of a series of negations, but a complete process of spiraling or wave-like progress, which is the unity of the progress and zigzag nature of development.

Adhering to this law requires us to oppose the metaphysical view of absolute negation, the linear theory of one-sided emphasis on negation, and the circular theory of denial of development.

The object scale and the subject scale are expressed in human activities as the principle of truth and the principle of value.

The principle of truth and the principle of value are dialectical unity: (1) The principle of truth embodies the requirements of the object scale, which requires people to engage in practical activities according to the original face of the world and its laws when knowing the truth, without considering the needs and interests of human subjects; The value principle embodies the requirements of the subject's scale, and it requires people's thoughts and actions to reflect the satisfaction of the subject's needs and interests. (2) the principle of truth mainly indicates the objective constraints of human activities; The principle of value mainly indicates the purpose of human activities. (3) The principle of truth is the principle of unity in social activities, and the principle of value is the principle of diversity in social activities.

Truth is monistic, truth itself has no subjective distinction, it is subordinate to the material unity of the world; Values are diverse, and different subjects have different needs, different value requirements and value choices. (4) There is a contradiction between the principle of truth and the principle of value, the contradiction between truth and value is the inherent contradiction of human activities, and the unity between them is the inherent requirement of human activities. The continuous emergence and resolution of the contradiction between the two promotes the development of practice and the progress of mankind.

Realizing the concrete historical unity of truth and value on the basis of practice is an intrinsic requirement of the progress of human society and is also a basic principle of Marxist philosophy.

Cognition is the understanding and inner reflection of matter, the subject scale is the judgment of matter based on personal emotion and will, and the object scale is the judgment of matter based on objective facts and laws, the two are two opposites and have no direct connection.

China's Criminal Law stipulates that there are more than 400 kinds of crimes, and from the analysis of the constituent elements, each crime has four elements: the subject of the crime, the subjective aspect of the crime, the objective aspect of the crime, and the object of the crime.

1) The subject of the crime. Refers to a person who commits a criminal act. For every crime, there must be a criminal subject, some crimes are committed by one person, and the subject of the crime is one person, and some crimes are committed by several people, and the main body of the crime is several people.

According to the provisions of the Criminal Law, if a company, enterprise, public institution, organ, or group commits a crime, it constitutes a crime committed by a unit, and therefore, a unit can also become the subject of a crime.

2) The subjective aspect of the crime. refers to the psychological state of the criminal subject that the criminal conduct and the results of the criminal act they have committed. There are two kinds of mental states in the subjective aspect of crime, namely intent and negligence.

For example, if the offender commits the crime of theft, the offender wants to steal other people's property for himself; The crime of intentional injury is committed in which the offender wishes to cause bodily harm to another person. Some crimes are negligent in nature, such as the crime of arson, in which the offender has a state of mind of negligence. In the case where a unit constitutes a crime, the person responsible for the criminal act of the unit also has a subjective state of mind.

3) The objective aspect of the crime. Refers to the specific manifestation of a criminal act. For example, when committing the crime of fraud, the offender has the act of fabricating facts and deceiving others, and the crime of drug trafficking has the act of selling drugs, and so on.

4) The object of the crime. It refers to the social relations protected by criminal law and violated by criminal acts. The object of the crime is the object of the crime, such as homicide and injury, the object of the crime is the specific victim, and the object of the crime refers to the social relationship that the personal rights of citizens protected by the criminal law are not illegally infringed.