-
It is impossible for schools to cancel because online learning does not achieve the results of school learning.
First, the meaning of learning.
1) Acquire knowledge, develop skills, and generate cognition. The role of learning:Learning is for wisdom, for broadening one's horizons.
The specific knowledge you have learned may not be useful in the future, but it can enable you to understand more truths and become a person with accumulated wisdom. Without knowledge, you will have a narrow vision of the world.
(2) Learning as a way to acquire knowledge and communicate emotions. It has become an indispensable and important content in people's daily life, especially in the 21st century, in the era of knowledge economy, self-directed learning has become a magic weapon for people to continuously meet their own needs, enrich the original knowledge structure, obtain valuable information, and ultimately achieve success.
Second, the significance of the university.
1) The purpose of studying in college is not to make more money, not to find a decent job, not to get promoted and make a fortuneAlthough you may have a high degree of gold content, it can be used as a stepping stone. The meaning of university is to allow people to think independently.
of people. It is to make the immature heart mature, to broaden the horizons, to make the shallow people thick, and to make the impetuous heart calm.
(2) There is no direct connection between the major and the work of the university, and the undergraduate is only a general educationWhat's more important is to turn yourself into a reliable learning machine in the past four years, giving you a new topic, being able to find out the genealogy of knowledge, and eat it thoroughly according to its internal logic.
-
The theory of the extinction of schools" and the "theory of the abolition of teachers" are pure bizarre theories and nonsense.
Please believe that schools will never be canceled and teachers will always be around.
-
This is nonsense. Teachers cannot be abolished, and schools cannot be extinguished.
This is nonsense.
Also ignorant.
-
There are many ways to refute the idea of school extinction, such as:
1.Schools are the foundation of social development and an important part of the progress of social civilization. Schools are the main channels for the dissemination of education and culture in society, as well as a positive force for social progress.
2.Schools can provide students with a good educational environment, consolidate students' learning foundation, cultivate students' sense of social responsibility and innovation ability, and promote the development of a society with a broken code.
3.School is an important carrier of social culture, an important part of social culture, and an important place to maintain social culture.
4.The development of the school needs the support of the society, and the development of the society also needs the development of the school, and the relationship between the school and the society is complementary to each other.
All in all, schools are not going to die, they are an important part of social development and will continue to play an important role in social development.
-
With the development of people's perceptions and the Internet, maybe in a few decades, schools will die and teachers will be abolished.
People's self-learning ability and various tools will be especially helpful to people.
But now it is impossible to replace schools and teachers, and can only continue to change to make students' learning efficiency continue to improve.
-
This argument may sound a bit sensational, but it is not without merit.
Because in the past, people's evaluation of schools and teachers was that they should preach and teach and solve doubts, which is such a place, an institution, and such a profession.
But now, whether it is a school or a teacher, it is obvious that this can no longer be done, and the school has gradually become a profit-making organization, and the teacher has become a profession that not only cannot guide students well, but will destroy the talents of students.
Therefore, if there are no schools and no teachers in this society, and everyone learns in an independent way, there may be chaos for a while, but will the kind of institutions that are more conducive to education naturally grow in the end?
-
I don't agree with this point of view, because the school itself is a place to educate people, and teachers are educators, and if these two people disappear, then it is very bad.
-
The theory of the extinction of schools and the abolition of teachers is nonsense, and people who don't know anything about education are just talking nonsense.
At present, teacher make-up classes are a place where the social reaction is very strong, and it is also where many people think that teachers lack teacher ethics. Teachers charge a lot of money for make-up classes, which increases the financial burden on parents; The teacher's make-up class distracts the teacher's normal work and teaching, which affects the teaching effect. Teachers make up classes, many of which organize students in their own classes, which are nominally voluntary, but in fact have a mandatory meaning. Such public teachers should resolutely stop making up classes.
The profession of teachers is sacred and noble, and I envy the selfless feelings of the people's teachers very much.
Don't talk about low wages, just look at the farmers who farm.
We often say that children in rural areas lose at the starting line from birth compared to children in cities, how many examples of this phenomenon are there around you? >>>More
For example, my college roommate, my father is a local real estate boss who went to study in Australia, and I see his circle of friends every day, and I feel that our lives are different.