How to look at the Confucian way of treating others as you would not have them do unto you

For a proposition, we need to do a comprehensive analysis. "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" does not logically lead to "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." From logic, it can be seen that the original proposition is true, and the inverse of this proposition is also true, but "do to others what you want" is the negative proposition of the proposition "do not do to others what you do not want", and the negative proposition is not necessarily true.

What you don't want to do is just not to be imposed on others, but if the other person is willing, it does not fall within the scope of "giving". Whatever you want, others may not want, so you can't impose it on others.

Generally speaking, no matter whether it is "what you want" or not, you cannot "give", that is, impose on others, and give others something, there is only one criterion, that is, whether others themselves are willing or not, and cannot be imposed on others according to our standards.

What you don't want is not necessarily what others don't need; What should not be done to others is the personal perception of having something that you do not want; You don't want the leftover buns from breakfast, but it's a rare meal for the beggar next to you; Do not do to others what you do not want, what you want to say is not that the leftover buns from breakfast are very cold, maybe it will be bad for the stomach, and a little dirty, you should not give to others as food, but you should not give what you think is your personal opinion "The leftover buns from breakfast are very cold, maybe it will be bad for the stomach, and a little dirty, you should not give to others as food" to impose on others to contain personal opinions, which have subjective content and meaning, and do not do to others is the personal opinion when you have things you don't want.

Don't impose your thoughts on others You don't like to express others too much, you don't like to think more about other people's feelings in everything.

Do things with consideration for other people's feelings

I think it's okay, I just belong to the kind of person who is good to me, and I am good to me, and I don't care about me, hehe.

In the Analects of Yan Yuan, it is written, "Do not do to others what you would not do to yourself." This basically means that if you can't do it yourself, you can't ask others to do it. On the contrary, only if you do it yourself first, can you let others do it. We might as well borrow this sentence to talk about the method of doing popular science.

As a science popularizer, before disseminating science to the audience, you first need to have a deep understanding and knowledge of the science you want to disseminate, so that you can integrate it and spread it in a language that the target audience can understand. If the staff themselves do not have rich knowledge reserves and broad vision, it may be difficult to explain some things to the public, and the end result is that you don't understand it, and the people who listen to you don't understand it, which not only fails to achieve the effect of popular science, but goes against the original intention of making science easy to understand.

Rutherford once said something that basically means that if you can't explain what you do to the lady who mops the floor in your lab, you don't know what you do. Coincidentally, Albert Einstein also said that if you can't explain it in simple words, it's because you don't understand it well. This shows that before spreading communication, you must first figure it out and figure it out.

Of course, science popularizers are not omnipotent, they can't know everything, understand everything, understand everything, because anyone who leaves their professional field is no different from the general public, and we can even say that anyone should become the object of science popularization. In fact, on the one hand, this requires science popularization personnel to continue to learn and improve themselves, and on the other hand, it also means that science popularization personnel sometimes have to learn to say that they don't know, as the so-called "knowing is knowing, not knowing is not knowing, and knowing is also knowing." ”

For the general public, if a truth or a knowledge point can be fully understood through an article or a **, then such popular science is good. But what they may not know is that behind the production of this content is a lot of effort by the science popularizers, who consult the information and consult the experts, in order to figure things out before disseminating it. Such science popularizers are worthy of respect, and their methods are also worthy of praise.

This won't be another disgusting question in the textbook!

The words of Mencius are best illustrative of the fact that benevolence and righteousness are the greatest interests! Don't do to others what you don't want to do to others, which is also what everyone wants!

The pause is wrong, I rely on the literal whole of the light to study the core idea properly! Ministry of Education: Hey.

I think Confucius just wanted people to understand what he said, and he could think about something without stopping