-
I don't think time can be turned back, even if there is the speed of light, and nothing else is considered.
Time is the process of proving that objects are produced beyond the speed of light, and it is impossible to stop objects from being produced, on the contrary, it may speed up or slow down, and this is not equal, and I don't agree with what the second floor said, what you are doing is to compare the speed at which information needs to be transmitted, and if the speed of information can be transmitted faster than the speed of light, then there is no such thing as one year equals one hundred years.
On the other hand, the changes in the body are the same, and a day at the speed of light is the same as a normal day, and the underlying consciousness is still the same. I'm analogy: if you shake a flashlight around the speed of one revolution per second, then the range outside of 5,000 meters is equal to the speed of 5,000 meters per second, and if you make the torch rotate 100 times per second with mechanical motion, then you will exceed the speed of light at 5,000 meters away, or form a circular beam, and of course, this is not even the speed of light, and if the speed is going up, 1,000 revolutions per second Beyond 50,000 meters, that's really the speed of light, and at that scale you can do an experiment that proves that the speed of light doesn't change everything.
-
For example, if you sit on a train at the speed of light, you have been on the train for a year, but in fact it has been 100 years outside the train, this theory was proposed by Albert Einstein, and it has been confirmed that this theory is correct! There are many specific explanations, I won't tell you here, you can go to**check Hawking's universe**, and Hawking will explain it to you clearly! On the fourth floor, I suggest you take a look at Hawking's universe and you will understand, maybe I have more knowledge in this area than you, because I often study this knowledge.
-
With the current science and technology, it is impossible, because you want to have quality alone? Not at all! Then everything has to be of quality, right?
No matter how light it is, it can't be made without quality, right? Hehe, there are other wormhole claims, just like in science fiction movies, but only in the theoretical stage, I guess our grandson's grandson can't wait for this day! Hehe.
-
Is faster-than-light possible?
-
Doesn't faster-than-light exist?
-
Our company is faster-than-light financial network.
-
Faster-than-light is entirely possible, but it's impossible to go back in time using faster-than-light. If you exceed 1 times the speed of light, you can see 1 second in the past, and in order to see 1 minute, you need to exceed 60 times the speed of light. What about the past 1 year? It needs to exceed the speed of light by more than 300 million times.
-
The force applied can be an attractive force, so the velocity does not need to exceed the velocity of the object being forced.
So it's possible.
-
What is the fastest in the universe? Does "faster-than-light" really exist?
-
Is it? In theory, yes, it is well known that nothing can exceed the speed of light in a vacuum, butGeneral relativityJust say withInformation Energyof can't exceed the speed of light.
Theoretically) such a paper-cutting machine, the speed at which it is pressed down is the speed of sound, then he is faster than the speed of light; If I have a stick, I just need it to be long enough, on a plane, to sweep from point A to point B, and A to point B is faster than the speed of light, why is that? The reason is simple, and then none of them have itEnergy and information
Warp engine, inGeneral relativity, the universe will put a carpet.
is bendable, and the warp engine works by warping the space.
The space in front is reduced.
The space in the back is enlarged.
It's like this. It may be a little poorly drawn.
Such very itself is not moved.
Only space is moving.
This would allow for faster than the speed of light, because the ship itself was not moving, there was no information and energy.
SoThe effect of the mass-energy equation of general relativity on acceleration。(This is only theoretical, and it is not yet known whether it will work in reality.)
It only needs to be without information and energy.
The effect of the general relativistic mass-energy equation on acceleration is that matter with information energy cannot exceed the speed of light in a vacuum, most of the (most of the phase velocities are also unaffected).
Yes, there are faster-than-light ones.
I can't think of it all at once, so I can say a counterexample. >>>More
Question 1: Because A is faster than the light emitted by itself, B has no light and cannot be reflected until A arrives. Only after A arrives, B has light to reflect, but the reflected light must be reversed in time. >>>More
The theory of relativity does not allow matter with mass to move faster than the speed of light, and if the speed of light is reached, the mass will be added to infinity, so the theory of relativity does not allow matter carrying mass and information to exceed the speed of light. In fact, faster-than-light is not impossible, as long as it does not carry mass and information, faster-than-light is allowed. The expansion of the universe, the wave function of quantum mechanics, and the tachyon do not violate the special theory of relativity.
Very well conceived. However, the theory is not correct. Approaching the speed of light, the mass increases and time slows down. When the speed of light is reached, static mass matter becomes infinitely heavier, time stands still, and speed does not matter. >>>More
<> our world is essentially made up of many elementary particles "piled up" under different physical laws, neutrinos are not among the "building blocks of the universe". >>>More