Why did a landlord break through a shop on the first floor and a residential building on the second

The main reason why an owner broke through the shop on the first floor and the residence on the second floor caused the anger of the owner was that the owner smashed all the floor slabs of the shop on the first floor, and wanted to install a staircase in the shop on the first floor to lead directly to the residence on the second floor, which was convenient for travel, and it also looked like a small duplex was very high-grade and beautiful. As we all know, a shop is a shop, and a house is a residence, and it is naturally a bit inappropriate to decorate the shop and the house as a whole. At that time, the billing of electricity and water bills, and the billing of heating bills are all problems.

These problems are still small things, the most important thing is that the owner bought a high-rise shop and the first floor, and the owner smashed the floor slab, which can imagine how much impact it has on the entire building. Because of this move, the building is very likely to become a dangerous building, and this building is a high-rise, and the owners who live in the high-rise will not be in danger.

It is conceivable that the owners who have fried the pot in the owner group, and the owners who may buy a house in their lifetime are naturally very worried about any problems in their buildings. The owners blew up in the group of owners, undoubtedly worried about whether the barbaric behavior of the owners on the first floor would harm them, after all, no one wanted to live in a dangerous building and put their own safety at risk. I don't know how the owner of the first floor felt when he saw the owners opposing his approach in the owner group, it is reported that even if the owner saw the owners discussing the matter in the owner group, he did not stop the big action of continuing the transformation, or after the owners collectively reported, the intervention of the relevant departments made the owner stop work.

Ordered to restore the original state of affairs The relevant departments have ordered the owner to restore the floor slab of the shop to its original state, and there must be no more brutal rectification.

The owner's idea is very full, but the reality is very skinny, the shop is the shop, the house is the residence can not be wantonly transformed, can not be wanton, the floor and the load-bearing wall can not be moved, smashed is likely to endanger the safety of the whole building.

Because of the fear of safety hazards, if there is a problem in the building, no one can afford to take this responsibility. A good house will suddenly become a dilapidated house, and of course it will be angry.

Because the owner feared that there would be a safety hazard to penetrate the two floors, which would affect the safety of the entire building, and the owner did not have the right to change the original structure of the house, now the law enforcement authorities have asked him to restore the original appearance.

Because this may endanger the safety of other owners and affect the lives of other owners, this will trigger the owners to re-record.

Because the owner's behavior will seriously endanger the safety of the community and cause a lot of bad effects on others.

Because he did not seek the consent of the property in doing so, it may affect the quality of the house and may bring hidden dangers to the safety of other residents.

The owner made it easier for him to open up the floor slabs, but it changed the structure of the building, especially on the ground floor, which would pose a safety hazard to the residents of the entire building.

Doing so destroys the structure of the staircase itself, which may affect the safety of the residents of the entire building and harm everyone's interests. In addition, the conversion of houses into shops will affect the rest of residents. Therefore, it will cause the anger of the owners.

Because the owner will break through the floor slab and affect the load-bearing structure of the house, it is a safety hazard for the residents of the entire building.

Recently, the owner of a community in Chengdu bought a shop on the first floor and a residence on the second floor, and because he wanted to connect the shop on the first floor and the residence on the second floor, he actually penetrated the floor slab on the first and second floors, which was also opposed by the owners of the community. In fact, the owner's practice is very inappropriate, and unauthorized modification of the main structure during the renovation process is very likely to cause major safety hazards.

affects the quality and safety of the house, not to mention that the owner still renovates the floor slabs that penetrate the first and second floors. Whether the owner's decoration practice of piercing the floor slabs of the shops on the first floor and the residential buildings on the second floor will affect the quality of the house, the answer is yes, and we analyze the details as follows:

1. Legal level - the owner's decoration behavior is suspected of violating the law.

As we all know, the commercial housing or related shops we buy are built by the developer in accordance with the drawings, and the developer's drawings, building body, structure and other materials are all in the housing and construction, quality supervision station.

If the relevant regulatory authorities are recorded, the developer must build in accordance with the drawings for the record, and at the same time, the relevant supervision and regulatory departments such as housing construction, quality supervision station, and fire protection will also carry out the completion and acceptance of the project in accordance with the requirements and standards of the preliminary design.

fire protection acceptance, etc. The owner's decoration behavior destroys the original built structure of the house, which is an illegal act of unauthorized alteration and illegal construction.

In response to the owner's behavior, the relevant law enforcement department personnel said that after the incident, the local street urban management brigade and the district police station all went to the scene to inspect and found that part of the indoor floor slab was damaged, and the corresponding beams and columns and other structures were not damaged. At present, the relevant law enforcement unit has ordered the owner to restore the original appearance, and then will carry out acceptance, and issue the corresponding law enforcement documents to the owner, requiring it to restore the original state, and file a case for investigation, the owner through the floor slab This behavior is also illegal.

Second, the technical level - the demolition of the floor slab, the force of the whole building will be affected.

Technically, the owner's demolition of the floor slabs will affect the safety and quality of the entire building. The floor slab is a structural component that transmits the horizontal force between the columns, and the structural component that resists the horizontal force under the action of ** must not be removed. Generally, the bottom of the house is most affected by the force, and the main structure of the house shall not be changed when the house is decorated.

The house is a shear wall structure.

Shear walls, structural columns and beams, etc. are not allowed to be dismantled at will. The floor slab mainly plays the role of load transfer, and can be partially demolished according to the situation (the original design unit needs to be reviewed and agreed before demolition). Damage to shear walls, beams and columns, etc., the force of the whole building will change, and there will be certain safety hazards in the house under the action of the first force.

In summary, the owner's decoration behavior of demolishing the floor slab is suspected of being illegal and will affect the quality of the whole building, which is not advisable, and we hope that everyone will abide by laws and regulations.

Civilized decoration.

Of course, it will affect the quality of the house, not only the quality of the house, but also the structure of the entire floor, so he will also be legally responsible for his own practices.

It will definitely affect the quality of the house, which has already damaged the load-bearing system of the house a bit, and it is easy to be dangerous, and this behavior must be prohibited.

It will seriously affect the quality of the house. Doing so severely compromises the extent of the house and greatly jeopardizes the basic user experience.

As long as the load-bearing structure of the house is not affected, then there is basically no problem, but it is best not to make major changes that affect the safety of the house.

Doing so does affect the quality of the house, as it reduces the load-bearing capacity of the house.

Summary. Hello dear! We will be happy to answer for you, the developer has the right to build shops on the first floor, but it may be subject to local ** restrictions, such as building height, floor area, etc.

The first floor is a shop with only one floor, and the developer has the right to build it on the upper floor.

Hello dear! We are glad to answer that the developer has the right to build shops on the first floor, but it may be subject to local restrictions, such as building high hail returns, building hunger area, etc.

Dear, it is illegal to change one floor of a shop to two floors. Changing one floor of a shop to two floors without authorization is an illegal building and is an illegal act. For those who have not obtained the planning permit for construction projects or have not carried out construction in accordance with the provisions of the construction project planning slag mitigation permit, the competent department of urban and rural planning of the local people's government at or above the county level shall order the construction to be stopped.

The first floor is a shop with property rights, there is only one floor of the shop, and the top is the roof, and the developer has the right to build it on the roof.

Dear, the first stove on the top floor of the shop belongs to all the owners of the common ownership of the oak tour. From the perspective of ownership, the adjoining part of the house (which refers to the house that is structurally connected or shared).

Why can, that is not leaking fiber disturbance is an illegal construction, how to build without property rights, the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development gives only one layer of drawings, that is all returned to Dan There are erect owners, how can developers build indiscriminately, and the developer will rent it out for commercial use after building.

Dear, this is not allowed, developers are not allowed to rent it out for commercial use, this is illegal.

Pro, different real estate developers and shop developers have different rights to use in front of shops, so the right to use in front of shops is different.

Now that I've bought the shop, the roof construction hasn't affected my main body, so how should this situation be handled, dear, you can sue for this.

Dear, plus your shop has property rights, it is valid for him to sue if he does so.

The other roofs have been built by the developer, if I want to build the roof of my own shop, I can, how can this dispute be in my favor.

Dear, this is subject to the approval of the construction department, without the approval of the construction department, it is illegal to build an attic indoors without authorization.

Dear, developers can't build, including you.

It's not the interior is the top floor of the shop, now the cracked developers are building illegally, we also built our own wild answer, if the later management of the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development needs to be demolished, then everyone will Song Yuanhui to demolish, if the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development does not care, then how does this dispute need to be involved.

If the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development doesn't care, then you can complain to the local building management department and ask them to demolish the illegally erected building. If the building management department cannot demolish it, you can file a lawsuit with the local court and ask the court to order the demolition.

If the owner has not been approved by the relevant departments and erects buildings and structures on the roof of the community without authorization, it is an illegal construction.

Buying a shop on the first floor and a house on the second floor and knocking it through to prepare for the installation of stairs, I look at the owner's behavior in this way, extremely irresponsible, without considering the consequences that may result from doing so, this owner is really too selfish and selfish. We all know that load-bearing walls and floor slabs are absolutely unsmashable, because when building high-rise buildings, designers will fully consider the load-bearing, and the floor slabs of each floor are actually involved in the load-bearing. Especially the first floor, which is the basic stress point of the whole building, if this stress point is destroyed, it is obvious that the load-bearing of the whole building will have a very big problem.

This is so simple that anyone who has studied physics will know it, but it is impossible for the owners of first-floor shops and second-floor residences not to know it. Knowing that there is a risk and still doing it, it can only be said that the owner is looking at the problem too from his own standpoint, and he also has a feeling of luck.

It is obvious that there is no regret medicine sold in the world, there is no regret medicine sold in the world, the owner smashed the floor slab, only the steel bars remained, and if you want to install the stairs in this state, the steel bars must also be cut. In this way, the building is a high-rise, and the stress point has been damaged, and the building is very likely to become a dangerous building. Once there is a problem, the owner cannot afford to pay for it.

Once there is a problem, not only will his own illusions be shattered, but also many people, and the owner is destined to regret it at that time. Therefore, when thinking about things, don't be too selfless, don't be too selfish, or look at things from a more rational point of view.

It has been ordered to restore the original state, fortunately, the relevant departments appeared in time, and after the relevant departments appeared, they have clearly asked the owner to immediately restore the original state. The owners of the building can also breathe a sigh of relief that they don't have to sleep at night to fear that the building will collapse suddenly.

If you find a barbaric decoration, you must seek help from the relevant departments and immediately stop these illegal decorations in order to protect your personal safety and property safety.

This behavior of the owner is indeed not good, because he only thought of his own convenience, but did not expect that the structure of the entire floor would be changed because of his one practice. There are big security risks.

I felt that the owner was too selfish and disregarded the safety of the entire building owner for his own convenience; And he also has no right to change the structure of the house without permission, and hopes that he can restore the house to its original state as soon as possible.

It's his own business, and he has the money to buy it, and he can get it whatever he wants. It's not something you get by stealing chickens and dogs.

The owner was only interested in making it easier for him to go directly from the first floor to the second floor, changing the staircase structure, but ignoring the safety of the entire building's residents.

The owner's behaviour was very inappropriate. Changing the structure of the building without permission will affect the safety of life and property of the owners of the whole building. Moreover, it is not allowed for individuals to convert their residences into shops without the approval of the relevant authorities.

I don't think that's good, but if he doesn't harm the interests of others, I think it's okay, after all, he didn't break the law.