Which is true between the theory of internal causes and the theory of external causes, the differenc

External causes act through internal causes, which are the determining factors.

External factors can be internalized into internal factors under certain conditions, and gradually change in internal factors, qualitative changes, this condition is long-term unchanged or continuously strengthened or quite strong far beyond the internal capacity, forcing it to change, and if it is not adaptable, it will be eliminated and failed. Therefore, the ability to withstand internal factors becomes a factor in the action of external factors. The circumstances in which the action of external factors make the internal cause of change occur, such as:

The evolution of organisms, the impact of asteroids on the earth, and the drastic changes in the environment have forced organisms to evolve and adapt to survive.

In society, many people can adapt to changes in the environment, but some such as personal good character is affected by the environment and change, it is the role of external factors, but the internal factor of personal tolerance is playing a decisive role.

Internal determinism and external determinism are both wrong, specific things are analyzed in detail, some things are determined by internal causes, some things are determined by external factors, and some things are determined by both internal and external factors. Internal and external factors jointly determine and there are internal and external factors that are not equal, and internal and external factors are equal decisions, and the entanglement of internal and external causes is not determined by internal and external factors alone. The hatching of eggs and chicks is determined by both internal and external factors, eggs are internal factors, hens and other incubating eggs are external factors, and eggs are broken by external factors.

High school teachers like to give the example of eggs and chicks to illustrate the theory of internal causes, but in fact, eggs and chicks are the result of the joint determination of internal and external factors, while high school teachers do not talk about other external factors and other things that determine things, and are teachers, not teachers. Philosophy books are all about generalization, which is wrong in most ways of thinking about things.

The specific differences between internal and external causes are as follows:

1. Internal causes are the internal contradictions of things and the fundamental reasons for the development of things. External cause is the external connection of things, and is the second reason for the development of things.

2. Internal causes are the basis for the change of things, and external causes are the conditions for the change of things. External causes work through internal causes.

3. It is an important philosophical foundation for the policy of independence and opening up to the outside world.

The difference between the dialectical principle of internal and external causes:

1. It refers to the materialist dialectic that the internal contradictions (internal causes) of things are the source and driving force of their own movement and the fundamental cause of the development of things.

2. Internal factors are the basis of change, external factors are the conditions of change, and external factors play a role through internal factors.

Dialectical relationship between internal and external causes:

1. Internal causes, that is, the internal contradictions of things, are the fundamental reasons for the development of things. External causes, that is, the external connections of things, are the second causes of the development of things.

2. Internal causes are the basis for the change of things, and external causes are the conditions for the change of things. Extrinsic causes work through intrinsic causes.

3. It is an important philosophical foundation for independence, self-reliance and opening up to the outside world.

The dialectical principle of internal and external causes refers to the materialist dialectics that the internal contradictions (i.e., internal causes) of things are the source and driving force of the movement of things themselves, and the fundamental cause of the development of things. External contradictions (i.e., external causes) are the second causes of the development and change of things. The internal cause is the basis of change, the external cause is the condition of change, and the external cause acts through the internal cause.

Content and form are opposites: content is different from form.

Content and form are unified: first, content and form are interdependent, the form without content is an empty form, and the content without form is a bunch of elements. Second, content and form are interacting, content determines form, form reacts on content, or serves content - because when the form is suitable for the content, it promotes the development of the content, and when the form is not suitable for the content, it hinders the development of the content, and the form that does not pay attention to the actual effect is called formalism.

Third, the distinction between content and form is relative and complex, the same form can accommodate or express different contents, the same content can also have multiple forms of expression, the old form can serve the new content, and the old content can adopt the new form.

Creative ideas:

The principle of dialectical relationship between internal and external causes holds that the change and development of things is the result of the joint action of internal and external factors; Internal causes are the basis for the change and development of things; External causes are the conditions for the change and development of things, and external causes act through internal causes. This principle requires us to:

Adhere to the view of combining internal and external factors.

First of all, personal ideals are the catalyst for individual progress. Second, the realization of personal ideals contributes to the realization of social ideals. Secondly, the ideals of the individual also contribute to the progress of society.

The following is an example:

Philosophy and Life, as a compulsory course for secondary vocational students, highlights the importance of philosophy in the growth and development of students. It can guide students to make correct value judgments and behavioral choices, lay an ideological foundation for the healthy development of life, and gradually form a correct world view, life reputation and values.

Mr. Lu Xun once said, "A book that is not worth reading twice is not worth reading once." Nowadays, however, most of the books that people read are books that are only enough to read once, and although there are many books, it is very good to pick out one or two books that have taste and are worth reading twice, but "Philosophy and Life" is an exception.

I really haven't delved into it before reading Philosophy and Life, but here it is necessary to familiarize myself with the definition of philosophy: the original meaning of philosophy is "love of wisdom". Philosophy, as a science, turned out to be just an attitude towards life, that is, to maintain a curious nature and inquire into the truth of everything.

The difference between internal and external causes is mainly based on three aspects: the definition of internal and external factors, the principle of action of internal and external factors, and the conditions for the development of things. The detailed differences are as follows:

1 Definition of internal and external causes.

Internal and external causes are a pair of basic categories of materialist dialectics regarding the causes and motive forces of the development of things. Internal causes refer to the internal causes of the development and change of things, that is, internal contradictions; External causes refer to the external causes of the development and change of things, that is, external contradictions, which are the external connections and interactions between one thing and other things.

2 The principle of action of internal and external factors.

According to the fact that the internal cause plays a decisive role and the external cause plays a secondary role, then the event has failed, and the main responsibility should be attributed to the internal cause. But that's not the case. For example, if a pedestrian is walking normally and is hit by a car, the responsibility should go to the vehicle.

The inside and the outside are opposites, and since this is the case, then they should be equal, so their status should not be ranked.

3.conditions for the development of things.

The internal cause is the basis for the development of things, it is the first, it determines the basic trend of the development of things, and the external cause is the external condition for the development of things, it is second, it plays a role in accelerating or delaying the development of things. There is theoretically no question of who comes first between internal and external causes. In practice, there may be the question of which factor is weak, whether the internal or external factors are weak, that is, whether there is a practical problem of whether it is critical.

It is all causes, but one inside and one outside, the interaction between inside and outside will be the result, the internal and external factors will continue to gather into internal causes, and the external and internal factors will continue to develop under the action of things, and finally the cause will be the result.

There are two conditions that must be met for things to develop and change: internal causes and external causes.

Internal cause: It is the internal basis for the change and development of things, and refers to the interaction and struggle between the opposing sides of the internal contradictions of a thing. Internal causes are the basis for the existence of things, the inner essence of a thing that distinguishes it from other things, the source and driving force of the movement of things, and it stipulates the basic trend of the movement and development of things.

External causes: external causes of the change and development of things, that is, the interconnection and mutual influence of one thing and other things. Materialist dialectics holds that external causes are only the conditions for the development and change of things, and that external causes can only work through internal causes.

Meaning, role, different.