I invest, the other party invests in technology, how can I make us take risks?

There are more of these kinds of things now, the general technical stock has to be a party, to bear the mortgage in kind, so that you can have security, the company can entrust a law firm to sign a contract, even if he has no money to enter the company's account, but the contract is signed under the supervision of the lawyer, what is the company in the future, he can not escape legal responsibility, and the joint-stock enterprise you have to consult him about a lot of technical things in the future, he can make it difficult for you at any time. You have to find a like-minded partner in the food shop, or you will be busy in the future. But I wish you success.

The second floor said that it is basically impossible If someone else hands over the technology, then he has no meaning to exist, and at this time, others are also not ***.

4 It is more practical to say that many technology shares themselves have nothing to pledge, and if there is, he can choose to do it alone to get a bank loan, and it is true that he is like-minded

Landlords should be cautious about such things, but for the current network, technology is not a problem, it is mainly a profit model

This requires you to agree in advance that if the technology is shared, you will hand over the technology, and even if he suddenly flashes in the future, you can continue to hire someone to take over the work, or let him take out low-voltage products, such as houses.

1. The market size of venture capital. The more capital in the venture capital market, the more urgent the demand for venture companies, which will lead to an upward increase in the value of venture companies. In this case, the venture entrepreneur can get the venture capitalist's capital at a smaller cost.

2. Exit strategy. The market's response to IPOs and mergers and acquisitions directly affects the value of venture companies. The research shows that both IPO and M&A are possible exit methods, which are more conducive to increasing the value of venture companies than the basic approach of M&A exit alone.

3. By reducing risks and uncertainties in technology, market strategy, and finance, the Venture University can increase the value of venture companies.

4. Capital market timing. In general, when the trend is bullish, the value of venture companies is also bullish. After bargaining, the two parties enter the stage of signing an agreement, and the contract is signed that represents the wishes and obligations of both the entrepreneur and the venture capitalist.

1. Trust, thinking about your current situation here, if you have low trust in him, then you will not make the decision now, which means that you still trust him.

2. Secondly, his non-investment is actually based on an idea that he wants to try to start his own business, but does not want to take risks, and also wants to extract profits.

3. This is a matter of sincerity, there is no sincerity in doing business, the partnership is not negotiable, your friend is very rational, but frankly speaking, one may be that he is not a person with the psychological ability to take risks, and the second may be that he is too rational, self-interested, and everyone in the partnership has to make concessions, so it is possible to negotiate. In fact, it is easy to understand that he only knows that there will be many people who are unwilling to partner with him if he only takes benefits and does not bear losses, but he does not give corresponding sincerity. Maybe it's not that he doesn't want to contribute, if he has the heart, he should be able to borrow some.

Generally, even if the technology is invested, a small part of the shares will be contributed, such as about 10%. And he promised or attached some terms to bind himself, so that people could feel his sincerity, but in your statement, he didn't do it.

4. You can consider lending him money as capital, and technology stocks can also be counted separately, but the share and proportion should be negotiated. If he is not willing to lend him money, it shows that he will not have any special confidence in this risk or the continued operation of the whole project, and you are in danger at this time, and it is recommended not to partner with him.

5. Suspicion of seeking benefits by the company, because he is not responsible for profits and losses, and he dominates the company, he is fully capable of borrowing the company to seek his own interests, rebates, etc., such as: deliberately lowering the wholesale of goods to the first businessman and making a profit from the first businessman. In terms of production, the procurement of raw materials for production can be done by manipulating and manipulating.

6. Because of the beginning of the partnership, there are many doubts, people's hearts are chaotic, the company structure is a little chaotic, and all aspects of the regulations may not be perfect, which may lead to a lot of unnecessary disputes in the future. Especially when the company already has someone or something that can replace him.

7. In view of the above situation, it is necessary to develop a sound company mechanism, according to personal circumstances, if the investment funds are only a small part of their idle funds, you can consider, but if the main capital is not recommended to partner.

I'll give you one.

BAI Compromise Solution:

1.First of all, explain to your DU friend that he is not going to be unfair to other shareholders DAO. The point is that the other shareholders will be worried that because they have not contributed capital, they may not really care if they lose money or make money. Not your own money, no heartache.

2.Then explain to the other funders (and yourself) that your friend has experience in the industry and will rely on him to run the business in the future, so he should get more benefits.

3.After everyone agrees, it is proposed that your friend not contribute capital first, but his corresponding 25% stake will be advanced by other shareholders first. When he makes money and dividends, his 25% dividends will be repaid first.

After paying off 25%, you will actually take the money. In addition, because this friend of yours is actually running the company, he should have a salary in addition to dividends.

4.If the 25% advance can be nominally plus a few points of interest (e.g. 2-3%), it can motivate your friend to make the company profitable as soon as possible.

How is this solution?

There are a lot of investments like yours, the feasibility is there, now you mainly have to restrain him, since you cooperate with him, you should know his usual habits very well, pay more attention, and most importantly, after starting to cooperate, you should cultivate a person of your own as soon as possible, if you can learn better.

It's good to give your fist to someone who can't break it on the wall!

You can't do that, you can draft a contract, and you're still responsible for the company.

Yes, technology is an intangible asset just not too much.

Do you have a way to restrain him? Or do you have a detailed contract?

No, there is an asymmetry of risk and benefit between your copies. You can only earn and not lose, and you can't hurt him if you lose money. He stands on the edge of an invincible position, you stand on the edge of a cliff, and your survival depends on him.

Why do you invest but end up at the mercy of others, do you think you can accept such an outcome? This is not a partnership. This is him borrowing someone else's chicken to lay eggs, and you don't know what kind of partnership you are talking about.

Don't analyze why he didn't pay for it, if he could make 100% money, he would have gotten the money, you were fooled, this is a whole set of you are fighting risks for others.

Here's the key.

A trust bai, if you empathize with du, you become zhi, your friend becomes you.

Do you think this business can be done in-house? You think.

Why you don't allow for capital is the key.

2. Control You can control the economy, but what about debt? The product goes out and is realized, but what about the income?

There are also questions that you don't say and can't meet.

3. Risk I don't know if you are starting a business or not, and I don't know how much of the capital here is accounted for by your family and your own safe funds.

Overall, did you lose? Can you afford to pay it?

And why did your friends quit? Why don't you go and ask them why they are leaving?

There is no such thing in the world as only taking advantage of the situation and not suffering losses, be careful to get the ship of ten thousand years!

Theoretically, technology investment is in partnerships.

It is allowed in the nature of the industry, but in fact it is difficult to operate, I started from the partnership to start a company, personal advice, if there is not a certain certainty not to partner in the business, let alone someone to invest in technology, profit dividends will be very different in the future, and, if you want to start a business, you must choose an industry you are familiar with, repeatedly argue and listen to the opinions of others. Because although entrepreneurial failure is not a bad thing, why should you fail when it is possible to succeed, the first entrepreneurial failure will affect your decision-making power in the future, you must be cautious. At the beginning of starting a business, you should not only see the profitable side of the company, and be prepared for debt and capital shortage at any time.

It is recommended to start small and seek development in stability. Risks are not something that everyone can try.

You pay him a salary, and if you can't, find someone else.

This technique.

Bai dry strand is OK du

Generally, technology stocks also need to have a certain amount of capital injection.

DAO, for example, 10% of the capital + 10% of the technical shares, the year-end dividend is 20%, and 10% of the technical shares cannot be withdrawn from the shares, unless all shareholders think that his performance is better and the contribution can be another matter.

If his plan is feasible, he can ask him to contribute a part of the funds to the bank loan, and the year-end profit dividend can be appropriate, so that he has a sense of responsibility and works harder to complete your business plan.

The biggest problem is that you have disagreements at the current stage, and there will be even greater opinions on personnel appointments and dismissals later. So the best thing to do is to ask him to inject capital, and then the largest shareholder will be appointed and dismissed.

There are a lot of investments like yours, and the feasibility is there.