If you buy a house from an agent, can you negotiate the price with the landlord?

If you can negotiate the price, you ask the agent to help you make an appointment with the owner to talk. (Now the intermediary company is basically a transparent transaction, if he does not let you see the owner, it is very likely to eat the difference).

Precautions during the conversation:

1. Don't say that other people's houses are not good, try to talk about them step by step.

Second, the conversation is almost over, so to speak: "I really want to buy your house... It's all good, but the money in hand is not very rich. See if you can give us a discount. ”

3. Don't quote your own ** first, try to let the owner say a price first. (And then there's room to talk).

Of course, you can bargain, the final pricing power is in the hands of the homeowner, you have to have a way to negotiate directly with the homeowner. The agent is helping the homeowner, and the reason is that his ** has entrusted the agent. And the agents are all real estate experts, helping to fool, you can also pull them over and help you some, because you are the last to pay them.

Homeowners generally only provide**. without paying for it.

When the homeowner is listed, he will tell the intermediary the psychological reserve price, and then the intermediary will negotiate with the buyer.

The agent will not let you and the homeowner have separate contact, but if you are optimistic about the property, you can talk to the homeowner through the agent about the price.

Of course, you can also get in touch with the homeowner through some way and not buy through an agent, so as to save the agency fee. In order to prevent this phenomenon from happening, the agency will often ask you to sign a viewing agreement before viewing the property to restrict you from closing the deal privately with the homeowner.

Yes, you just have to tell them what you want**.

Is it reasonable to find an intermediary to look at the house, and be optimistic about getting rid of the intermediary and the two parties to trade directly in the future? For the occurrence of this situation, then I think it is unreasonable to find this intermediary and then the intermediary to serve us, then to do this kind of thing, of course, it is an unreasonable thing, of course, I can also understand the other party's approach, after all, if it is really in the intermediary to deal with the house, then it means that we have to pay the intermediary a very large commission, so in order to save this money, so it is normal to do this kind of thing<>

When something like this happens, the most important thing is to look at the specific situation, why do you say that? That's because sometimes, then the intermediary does not make a lot of this service, then the other party is also voluntary, and there is no substantive service, so it is reasonable to do this kind of thing, of course, like this thing, it is still necessary to conduct an analysis according to the specific situation, because sometimes the intermediary does not give a lot of this kind of substantive service, so at this time we get rid of the intermediary for a transaction, it is also a reasonable <>

It is strictly reasonable to say so many such things, why do you say that? Because doing such a thing means that we can save a lot of money, the other party's words do not give a substantial service, and there is no great benefit of this service, so it is reasonable for us to make this kind of thing, this is still based on the service given by the other party, if the service given by the other party, then it belongs to the kind of service with a lot of investment, then of course it is an unreasonable thing, so if it is like this thing, then it is necessary to analyze the <> according to the specific situation

In short, if this incident happens, if the intermediary does not provide a great service, and the interests involved are not so many, or he does not invest any interests at all, so this thing is reasonable, and if the occurrence of this incident has seriously infringed on the interests of the intermediary, then of course this thing is unreasonable.

Yes, whether it is reasonable to get rid of the intermediary and direct transactions between the two parties really depends on the situation. But in general, I don't recommend everyone to do this, especially those who just need to buy a house for the first time, and don't know enough about the real estate market. The safety of the house is more important than the agency fee, and you must buy your own house safely.

I don't think it's very reasonable, you are disrespectful to people, and it is also an irresponsible and immoral behavior.

Irrationality. Because in the process of viewing the property, the agent also pays his time and energy for you.

Hello, happy to answer your questions.

It certainly doesn't make sense to do that.

The reasons are as follows: one: knowing that the intermediary company is a kind of paid company that provides housing intermediary services, and it is clear that it is a company that survives by charging intermediary service fees, even if it finds an intermediary, it is a kind of non-contractual entrustment, and the intermediary has also performed, and found a suitable ** for the entrusting party, it is reasonable to carry out the housing transaction, complete the housing transaction, and pay the intermediary service fee to the intermediary company according to the contract.

Two: From the moral code, in fact, it is to cross the river and tear down the bridge, and do not keep promises. Three:

Intermediaries introduce customers, take a look, pay labor, should have labor remuneration, most of the intermediaries have no basic salary or low basic salary, is to get a transaction commission, if they encounter the behavior of throwing off orders, how to survive? Four: from the aspect of business behavior and corporate behavior, the intermediary company is also an enterprise and also has an office; Personnel; Taxes and other expenses also need profits, and the payment of labor should also be charged as an intermediary fee, as income, which is justified and reasonable.

The reasons are as follows: one: knowing that the intermediary company is a kind of paid company that provides housing intermediary services, and it is clear that it is a company that survives by charging intermediary service fees, even if it finds an intermediary, it is a kind of non-contractual entrustment, and the intermediary has also performed, and found a suitable ** for the entrusting party, it is reasonable to carry out the housing transaction, complete the housing transaction, and pay the intermediary service fee to the intermediary company according to the contract.

Two: From the moral code, in fact, it is to cross the river and tear down the bridge, and do not keep promises. Three:

Intermediaries introduce customers, take a look, pay labor, should have labor remuneration, most of the intermediaries have no basic salary or low basic salary, is to get a transaction commission, if they encounter the behavior of throwing off orders, how to survive? Four: from the aspect of business behavior and corporate behavior, the intermediary company is also an enterprise and also has an office; Personnel; Taxes and other expenses also need profits, and the payment of labor should also be charged as an intermediary fee, as income, which is justified and reasonable.

So I think it's very unreasonable to get rid of the intermediary and make a deal on your own. As a buyer, I have paid a lot of money to buy a house, and it is even more burdensome to pay a lot of intermediary fees. Many intermediary companies eat the price difference and do whatever it takes to get a commission, but they can't use this as a reason to have no contract spirit and don't keep their promises.

If this is no different from those unscrupulous intermediaries. In order to save costs, we can use a proper way to sell some houses, find someone to contact the house, and then find a reputable intermediary to go through the relevant procedures, so that you can save a lot of costs.

This is very unreasonable, and it also damages the trading rules of this market, and it is very likely that you will be blocked by the intermediary in the future, and some people will even seek revenge from you.

This is unreasonable, because the intermediary is also a profession, and it is also a job.

If the total transaction of the house is higher, then the intermediary fee that needs to be paid must be more, although the higher the house price, the lower the proportion of the intermediary fee charged, but the total price is still relatively high.

Don't quote the net price, which can easily lead to chaos in the house. Many landlords who sell houses like to say, "I'll get 1 million yuan, whatever, you look at yourself and add it, sell more and count yours!" "That's ruined!

There are many people who will quote you for money, one by one, and you will be confused if you really meet prospects! "How much does this landlord want to sell? Moisture!

Therefore, in order to avoid this situation, you had better report like this: "1.01 million minimum payment intermediary fee". You still get 1 million, but the advantage is that it is not too chaotic, and the agent is willing to sell the house with the agency fee (the agent does not like to sell the house at the net price, and psychologically feels that he does not respect his labor).

It's a numbers game, but there's something deep hidden in it.

For home buyers, the agency fees charged by both parties are not necessarily beneficial, and here is an explanation:

1.The cost burden is heavier.

For home buyers, paying additional brokerage fees can make it more burdensome. If the buyer and seller charge each an intermediary fee, then the buyer will need to pay 3% of the total house price as the brokerage fee, which may have a large impact on the buyer's budget.

2.Intermediary fees are not transparent.

In the process of buying a house, intermediary fees are often an unavoidable expense. However, the opacity of agent fees can be frustrating for home buyers. If there is no clear calculation standard or list of fees, then buyers may feel uneasy and distrustful.

3.The quality of intermediary services varies.

The uneven quality of intermediary services is also an issue that buyers need to consider. If both parties charge intermediary fees, then the intermediary company may focus more attention and resources on the seller, and the quality of service to the buyer may be reduced. This can have a negative impact on the homebuyer's experience.

4.Other options may exist.

While intermediary services are an important part of the home buying process, there are other ways for buyers to purchase a home. For example, home buyers can transact directly with homeowners or use the ** platform to find a home. These options may allow homebuyers to save money on agency fees, while also gaining more control and freedom.

To sum up, the intermediary fees charged by each party are not necessarily beneficial to the buyer. Buyers need to consider the impact of agent fees on their budget, the quality of agent services, the transparency of clearance fees, and other options for buying a home to make the best decision.

It is a common way to conduct real estate transactions in which buyers and sellers charge brokerage fees. Under this model, both parties to the home buyer and seller need to pay an intermediary fee. Is this type of charging beneficial for home buyers? This article will analyze the following aspects.

First of all, it needs to be clear that the agency fee paid by the buyer is actually the service fee paid to the agency company. Intermediaries play an important role in the entire transaction process, and they provide a variety of services for buyers, including information inquiry, house viewing accompaniment, negotiation, contract signing, etc. These services require costs and manpower and material resources, so there is a certain service fee.

Secondly, the agent fee paid by the buyer can get better service. Intermediaries provide a range of services during the transaction, including finding the right one, assisting in signing contracts, coordinating loans, and more. If a home buyer chooses not to pay the agency fee, then they may face problems such as insufficient information and inadequate services.

Paying the agency fee allows buyers to obtain more comprehensive and professional services, so as to better protect their interests.

Thirdly, the intermediary fee paid by the buyer can avoid some risks. In the process of real estate transactions, there are many risks, such as falsehood, fraud, etc. If homebuyers don't have enough knowledge and experience to deal with these risks, then they are vulnerable to losses.

By paying the brokerage fee, buyers can get more protection and support, such as lawyer consultation, legal aid, and so on. These services can help home buyers avoid some potential risks, thus reducing the risk of the transaction.

Finally, it is important to point out that the intermediary fees paid by home buyers are not completely cost-free. While there are many benefits to the services provided by an agency, there are also costs that the buyer has to bear. Therefore, when choosing the agency fee to pay, buyers need to weigh the pros and cons and consider their actual situation and needs.

To sum up, it is not completely beneficial for buyers and buyers to charge rebates from intermediaries.

The amount of goods can be discussed.

How to calculate the second-hand housing agency fee:

1 Generally speaking, the agency fee for second-hand housing is 1 to 2 of the house transaction**. However, there is no uniform regulation on intermediary service fees before burying liquid, and they are generally charged in accordance with the habits of the industry. So let's take a look at the general fees of second-hand housing agents.

2 At present, the agency fee for second-hand housing is generally charged according to the total housing payment, including the intermediary fee and the guarantee service fee (guarantee fee). Small intermediary companies generally charge 1 of the transaction price of second-hand housing, and sometimes they can't collect how much they can charge, because the second-hand housing agency fees they charge are all earned by themselves.

3 The economic service fee indicated by the intermediary company has included the cost of real estate registration and handling the relevant procedures for second-hand housing, and the buyer only needs to pay an additional 80 yuan of the housing cost and 1,500 yuan of provident fund loan guarantee collected by the company.

The second-hand housing agency fee can be bargained:

1 second-hand housing intermediary fees can of course be bargained, although the competent authorities stipulate that a small number of particularly complex residential brokerage services, must be negotiated and agreed by all parties to the transaction to determine the second-hand housing intermediary fees, but can be appropriately raised on the basis of the prescribed fee standards, and the increase shall not exceed 10.

2 If you know someone in the second-hand housing intermediary company, note: now the second-hand housing intermediary fee is generally charged according to the total housing payment, including the intermediary fee and the guarantee service fee (guarantee fee), small intermediary companies generally charge 1 of the second-hand housing transaction price, in fact, the second-hand housing intermediary fee is generally charged in accordance with the habits of the industry.