Both of them are married for the second time, and after marriage, the woman asks the man to pay for

Both are married for the second time, and both have pensions.

Is it reasonable for the woman to ask the man to pay all the living expenses after marriage?Since both of you have a pension, then you are all in the situation of looking for a wife, and the timely pension of the two elderly people should not be used up, and if there is a conflict for these living expenses, it is actually worth the loss. is a second marriage, you have to treat her as your wife or husband in your heart, not as a tenant who rents a house together, don't be nervous in this trivial matter, it is easy to hurt feelings, the emotional foundation of the second marriage is not so deep.

So the woman should not be too stingy, and bear the expenses of the family a little, and the man is also a little more generous, so how about bearing a little more of the expenses at home?Anyway, generally speaking, the retirement salary of two people is not enough to spend.

Both are married for the second time, and after marriage, the woman asks the man to pay for living expenses, do you think it is reasonable?From what you have said, it is not reasonable for both of them to retire and remarry, and for the woman to ask the man to pay for their living expensesIf it's a two-person world, it's reasonable to eat with daily expenses.

The daily living expenses of two people don't cost much. However, if it exceeds the cost of daily life, it is unreasonable for the man to bear it. For example, the woman's travel expenses, beauty expenses, and the courtesy expenses of the woman's relatives, these are unbundled, and the man may not be able to bear it.

Therefore, when a man and a woman become husband and wife, they must love each other, care for each other, and understand each other, so that life will be better and better.

If it is only for daily living expenses, there should be no problem for the man to pay for it. However, large living expenses still need to be shared by both parties.

Whether it is a first marriage or a second marriage, as long as it is married, it is a family, and the man has the responsibility and obligation to take the initiative to contribute to the family, so it is completely appropriate to pay for the family's living expenses.

Normal, although men and women are equal now, but it is also a matter of course for men to support their families, because in ordinary life, women pay much more to their families than men

Unreasonable!Doesn't the other party have the ability to live independently?Unless the man is very rich and willing to support her.

It doesn't make sense, the man has no obligation.

This is a particularly selfish woman, who is not the person with whom you live at all. But it also depends on what the situation is, if two people live together, then the burden is shared right, second marriage, many people are ill-intentioned deception, so, watch more communication! If it doesn't work, disperse!

There is no reasonable and unreasonable theory between husband and wife, only Zhou Yu beats Huang Gai, one is willing to fight, and the other is willing to suffer. It depends on how the relationship between the two is.

That's right. Marry a man, marry a man, dress and eat.

It is a man's responsibility to provide for his family.

Between husband and wife, how can you still divide you and me. If you can afford to marry a daughter-in-law, you must be able to afford it. There's no need to worry about a first or second marriage.

Nothing is wrong.

To find a Han is to dress and eat.

Legal Analysis: A lawsuit can be filed in court to demand alimony from the ex-husband. The people's courts are to enforce judgments or rulings on alimony, child support, alimony, division of property, inheritance, visitation of children, and so forth, in refusal to enforce them in accordance with law.

Legal basis: Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 1085:After divorce, where children are directly raised by one party, the other party shall bear part or all of the child support. The amount of the cost to be borne and the length of the period shall be agreed upon by both parties; If the agreement is not reached, the people's court shall make a judgment.

The agreement or judgment provided for in the preceding paragraph does not prevent the child from making a reasonable request to any of the parents to defend themselves in excess of the amount originally set in the agreement or judgment when necessary.

Article 1088:Where one of the spouses bears more obligations due to raising children, taking care of the elderly, assisting the other party in work, and so forth, they have the right to request compensation from the other party at the time of divorce, and the other party shall give compensation. The specific measures shall be agreed upon by both parties; If the agreement is not reached, the people's court shall make a judgment.

Article 1090:In the case of divorce, if one party has difficulties in living, the other party who can afford it shall give appropriate assistance. The specific measures shall be agreed upon by both parties; If the agreement is not reached, the people's court shall make a judgment.

Both parties are married for the second time, and the woman also proposes a bride price and a wedding, do you think it is necessary? True love knows no age group, and at the same time, it does not matter whether the other party is the first marriage or the second marriage. True love, on the one hand, is selfish and belongs only to the individual.

In order to give this person happiness, on the other hand, it is selfless, only talking about dedication, not returning. Even for the safety of her life, she will not hesitate to give up her own life at all costs.

Both parties are married for the second time, and the woman also asks for a bride price and a wedding.

Marriage is that both parties like each other, it is two people who form a new family together, whoever has good conditions, who will take a little more, all in your affection and my willingness, not what is my daughter raised in her 20s, how much effort has been spent, married to your family, is it not that the son of other families is not raised by his parents bothered to baal? A couple of newlyweds in a small family are parents who are in charge of their food, clothing, housing and transportation before they get married, not only what happened to the woman, but the obligation of raising a daughter is to marry happily, and you can't just see your hard work and erase the other party's pay!

Although people are not objects, even if they are objects, they have their own ** and gold content, and do not objectify women, but women themselves also contain energy, because you are married to a wife, and the future is your wife, your child's mother, your grandson's grandmother, and the person who has walked the world together for the rest of your life. Money doesn't matter! It's the feelings that matter!

The year is not important, the day is important! The world is upside down, others don't care what you care about, and you don't care what others care about. The woman is not asking for a bride price, but a sense of security.

Do you feel the need for it?

Some people think that they are all second marriages, so there is no need to be too public, just keep a low profile. But there is no such law, that person said that the second marriage is not allowed to have a wedding! As long as you are willing and capable, it is natural to be chic again!

Then again, it's voluntary. If you want to do it, no one can stop it. If you don't want to do it, no one can do it.

Do what you can and choose according to your actual situation.

I think it is necessary, which may show that the woman attaches great importance to her marriage, in fact, whether it is a second marriage or not, the woman should be given the most basic respect.

If both parties are married for the second time, it is normal for the woman to ask for a bride price, and the bride price can be given appropriately, but the etiquette cannot be left behind.

It is especially necessary to improve one's status and one's own livelihood.

First of all, I must point out that no marital relationship should be based on material things. If one party wants the marriage to be financially stable or to enjoy luxury, then the relationship is unhealthy and is not destined to last.

Going back to your question, about the situation of "the second marriage of a man and a woman who combines a woman spends a lot of money on the man and wants the man to support her Zhen Qingdan", I don't think the question is whether the woman spends the man's money. In marriage, both spouses should share household expenses, including necessities, children's education, family maintenance, and so on. If one partner spends more money in the marriage, then this does not mean that he or she has to "feed" the other party.

However, if the woman only uses the man's money to satisfy her material desires, and is not willing to take on the obligations and responsibilities in the marriage, then this situation needs to be carefully considered. In this case, the man must seriously consider whether to marry such a woman, because this marital relationship is unequal and unhealthy, and it is difficult to build it on the basis of true love and respect.

In closing, I would like to say that everyone has their own values and standards, and they cannot be generalized. If the man feels that he can accept the woman's behavior and is willing to live with her, then this is his choice. It is important to make your own decisions and live with the consequences.

Not recommended. In today's social development, women have the same rights as men, and no matter appearance, education or even wealth, it should not be the only criterion for marriage. Therefore, it is recommended that both parties pay attention to each other's internal factors such as education, personality, career, and concept absoluteness, and make progress together.

I think it's reasonable. Because in daily life, both parties need to support their lives, and of course they need to pay for living expenses.

I think it is reasonable, regardless of whether the two people are married for the second time or not, but the man has the responsibility to share the living expenses in the marriage.

Plausible. No matter how many marriages they have, they all live together after marriage, and the expenses of the family should be borne together, not just the responsibility of the woman.

After the second marriage, the man does not give living expenses, is it illegal, and the man is still worried about the man when the woman earns money.

If the man does not pay living expenses after marriage, it is generally a crime for Brother Pei Xun; The law stipulates that husband and wife have the obligation to support each other, and when one party is unable to live due to various reasons, the other party shall support him/her, including but not limited to matching for living expenses, and can also purchase daily necessities.