Debate competition, debate how to stand

Literature is the foundation board, and a solid foundation is the guarantee of the building.

There are two main aspects: first, in the work, written communication is a formal and legally recognized way, that is, there is sufficient evidence for written communication compared with oral communication; Second, for long distances, written communication is more rigorous because it is more prepared than oral communication. Because of the above two points, the information should be conveyed in written form from design to practical problems in the work.

Whereas, verbal communication is only a preparation for the formation of the written word.

In fact, eloquence is important because it is the main way of communicating. A person can be a writer, and it is not a big deal to say his thoughts and let others write them; But if you don't speak well and can't communicate with others, you won't be able to achieve anything.

Literary talent and eloquence, the relationship between the essence and the end, without literary talent, eloquence has no foundation, just like water without a source, a wood without roots. Eloquence is the ability to express one's understanding, and literary talent is the ability to understand the mind, without one's ability to have the correctness of eloquence, how can there be eloquence and catchiness. Literary talent needs eloquence to express, and eloquence needs literary talent to enrich, but first there must be literary talent to have eloquence, just imagine the politicians and diplomats at home and abroad in ancient and modern times, which one is a barren generation of literary talent?

I think literary talent is more important, literary talent comes from the heart, and it is manifested externally, maybe someone is born with a mouthful and will encounter a lot of trouble because of this, but if he has it, he can at least have self-confidence, he can make people trust, short-term contact, eloquence shows its function, but as a person who has been in society for a long time, your literary talent makes you different, of course, eloquence is also very important.

Literary talent is the first brain, and eloquence is formed through the brain to have eloquence, if a person wants to say it, and speak it well, literary talent is a certain foundation, that is to say, there is no literary talent without eloquence, in contrast, of course, literary talent is more important than eloquence.

In today's society, communication is used.

1.Literature is the basis of eloquence (there is no ink in the stomach, where does eloquence come from).

The process of argumentation is to use logical thinking forms such as concepts, judgments, and reasoning to analyze and synthesize objective things; Then, by presenting facts and reasoning, he directly proves his own claims from the front. The ultimate purpose of the argument is to correctly reveal the essence and laws of objective things.

The arguments presented should be clear, accurate, and correct. What is for and what is against should indicate the author's attitude; The views put forward should be able to truthfully reflect the reality of objective things; The established arguments should reveal the essence of things, conform to scientific principles and the party's principles and policies, and reflect the aspirations and demands of the masses of the people. The viewpoint is in the material, the material is in practice, and the correct viewpoint is in the scientific analysis of the material, which requires us to have a Marxist standpoint, viewpoint and method.

Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen political study and constantly improve our theoretical accomplishment and ability to understand, so that we can extract clear, accurate, and correct viewpoints from a large pile of materials. In short, the argument should be extracted from the actual material, and be correct and distinct.

Many people will worry about how to write the thesis of a debate competition every time.

How to write a debate essay

The argument is divided into two parts, the first refers to how to make an argument.

That is, after we have a basic understanding and analysis of the debate topic, we will interpret and connect the words existing in the debate. Then it can be expanded according to the information we have prepared, and it can be classified according to the progressive relationship or the parallel relationship to smoothly establish the argument system. Since you mentioned writing, I guess you are in the second part of the doubt, that is.

How to write a defense. There is no standard format for the manuscript itself. But if you're new to it, you might as well write it according to the way you write it.

The points to note are:

1. At the beginning, I would like to say thank you, Chairman, Chairman, judges, friends of the other party, and good friends, audience. It is a pleasure to discuss today's debate with the opposing debate friend. Of course, different regions have different sayings, but basic courtesies and etiquette are necessary.

2 After the politeness, it is best to have a solution to today's debate, that is, to tell everyone what this debate means, how we can prove this debate, and the main direction of the debate.

3 Before each argument, it is best to express clearly the explanation of the argument that you are making in this paragraph. Film.

4. You can add appropriate strength or data, which is conducive to strengthening your persuasiveness.

5. Have a certain grasp of your own speaking speed, and should not exceed the number of words.

6. If you have strong confidence in your speech and expression, then you may want to try to add a little flattering language to enhance the appeal of the manuscript.

If you grasp the above six points, you should be able to write a qualified manuscript.

Another thing to note is:

There is a good way to argue. First put out the definition and then the standard (depending on the situation), and then discuss it according to the three points of theoretical current affairs value. (This is just one of the ways, depending on your debate).

In summary, it is to summarize the problems of both sides, fully refute the problems of the other side, and then expound one's own views according to one's own problems, and there is no fixed format. Even if you don't talk about the problem, you can just explain your point of view fully.

Theory is concerned with a three-dimensional structure, and summary is to take apart the structure and show it to others, so that others can understand your point of view.

The argument is divided into four steps: concepts, concepts (including the concepts and alleles of each word in the debate); relationships (both internal and external); 3. Assumptions (the basic assumptions set for the purpose of making an argument, including the tacit platform for the debate); Fourth, logic.

4. Logic (including logical framework and logical bottom line).

When we get the debate topic, we first clarify the basic concept, but when we really determine the concept, we often reach the final stage of preparation. A good definition is half a success, and the process of definition is actually a process of argumentation, so we must pay attention to concepts. It is a pity that many debaters do not even think about the concept when they get the debate topic, and do not deeply analyze the meaning of each word in the debate question, and the result theory is not good.