How to start an argument at a debate 20

The argument should be formatted, the content should be reasonable, and there should be strong arguments. The role of "argument and argument": to establish the beginning of the argument, lay the foundation, ideas, logic, and direction of the whole debate competition.

Therefore, "argumentation" is something that every debater should have at his fingertips.

"Arguments" are based on a deep understanding of the debate, and the results of a week's or even half a month's hard work are all in a "statement," which should be the essence of the essence.

The order in which the argument is written is generally as follows: put forward one's own position, then put forward a definition, and then derive a standard. The queen puts forward the arguments, and the arguments are generally no more than four, and finally summarizes.

Of course, a routine is a routine, but we encourage innovation, and each debater can write his or her own "statement" according to his or her own style. However, it does not mean that the argument is written as a debate, it is naturally the essence of the entire debate team.

An example of the opening argument of the first argument is as follows:

The first part: theoretical traceability, the explanation of concepts, at this time we need the guidance or corroboration of theory, give full play to the role of theory in practice, combine theory with debate, and play the role of throwing bricks and leading to the source of the source. But to be clear, theory covers not only the universally accepted theorems and laws, but also the famous sayings and aphorisms of politicians, writers, and democrats.

The second part: value reality, the establishment of the positions of the two sides, the theories of all parties give evidence, the opening of the important position is the affirmation and elaboration of the value of the position, if there is no value of his own, the position will appear fragile, the attack will appear weak.

Therefore, it is important to highlight the value of the position. The way to display the role of value is to use facts as the basis, facts are shown in everyone's eyes or there are words that can be verified, facts speak louder than words, with charts and numbers to express text, more convincing.

Part 3: Comparison of Merit, where there are differences in the positions of both sides of the debate, there is naturally a comparison. Comparisons can highlight the main and secondary, can explain whether there is or is not, can support what should and should not be, and only by making comparisons can you better show the necessity of the existence of the topic and better express your understanding of the debate.

In the process of comparing the positions of the two sides, find their own advantages and make use of their strengths and avoid weaknesses. There are many ways to compare, and it can be analyzed in combination with values and theories.

How to prepare for a debate tournament:

Preparation 1: Understand the format and requirements of the debate competition, different competitions have different rules, and what you find on the Internet may not be applicable. Pay attention to the process and time to ensure that it is accurate. Also pay attention to the dress code and debate etiquette.

Preparation 2: Understand the specific work of each position, and choose the position that suits you according to your own characteristics. For example, the requirements for debaters in the first debate and the second and third debates are very different.

Preparation 3: Understand the scoring criteria and prescribe the right medicine. For novices, instead of training those many skills, it is better to find the judges' points and deduction points, and use this as a guideline.

You can ask the seniors who know about the competition, and their experience is more useful for beginners than the debate theory in the book.

Debate Contest (Language Expression Competition):

Debate tournaments are also called debate tournaments, and they are also called debate meetings. In form, it is a kind of competition in which the two parties debate on a certain issue, but in fact, it is a competition of related knowledge, a competition of thinking and response ability, a competition of language expression ability, and a competition of comprehensive ability.

Opening remarks: Dear judges, audience and friends:

First of all, keeping a friend's secret can enhance friendship. People need to build trust among their friends, and private information needs to be protected. If friends protect each other's secrets, their friendship will become stronger.

Second, keeping a friend's secret can boost self-esteem. If a person's secret is leaked, he may feel insulted and hurt. By keeping friends secret, people can gain a sense of security and also boost their self-esteem.

Argument against the other side: But sometimes keeping a friend's secret can cause harm to the friend. If a friend has committed a crime and knows that he does not report it to the police, then it is rude. Therefore, keeping secrets between friends can do more harm than help.

Second argument: Moreover, keeping a friend's secret may also cause trouble to me. When a person knows a friend's secret, but can't tell it, it gets upset. Sometimes this uneasiness can have an impact on their social life.

Conclusion: In conclusion, there are pros and cons to keeping a friend's secret, and we should make the right judgment based on different situations. Finally, I would like to stress again: friends should keep secrets from each other.

Thank you!