Is it problematic to look directly at the English version of microeconomics in freshman year 20

You're only a freshman, so you don't need to watch the English version.

The English version is better because domestic scholars like to outline and lead, pay attention to the systematization of knowledge, and organize and list all the knowledge points, but beginners often feel that some places are obscure and difficult to understand when they learn by themselves.

Western authors, on the other hand, are accustomed to narrating a matter in plain language completely, clearly, and easily understandable, even if they are not professional students. But the disadvantage is that it is not as logical and systematic as the Chinese version.

You are studying finance, that is to say, microeconomics is a compulsory course, I haven't studied it now, I will definitely learn it in my sophomore year, you can rest assured that you must study economics for economic management majors, and I understand that micro, macro or finance are professional subjects for postgraduate examination.

When the time comes, your teacher will definitely explain it to you in detail and completely, and there will be no questions that are difficult for you to understand, if you really don't understand, you can still ask the teacher in person I think the most important thing in my freshman year is to grasp the basic courses. High math, English, you will know that this is very important later. Especially if you are in finance, some prestigious schools also require high mathematics to be very good when admitting to graduate school.

Of course, if you have time, it is of course good to read foreign language works, and it certainly does not hurt. I'm just saying it's not necessary. If you really want to broaden your knowledge, you can look at Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations and Keynes's General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.

These are the most important contributions to the composition of the knowledge system of micro and macroeconomics, and Adam Smith is the originator of economics, and many courses in economics are related to his works. In macroeconomics, most of the time Keynes's theory is discussed.

Moreover, "The Wealth of Nations" is easy to understand, it is not difficult to understand, you can read it when you have time, you can read the Chinese translation, there is no need to read the original version, it is beneficial to you.

Finally, I wish you success in your studies!

If you don't know English well, you don't want the English version, and it's useful if you don't understand it.

No problem, the English version of the textbook is actually quite simple, except for a few words that need to be checked for meaning, you can basically understand it.

13.On an indifference graph, the appropriate path for a consumer to reach the equilibrium position is described below. Consumers should:

a。Move to the budget line to represent the point where the currency value of the portfolio is the highest.

b。Move to the point on the budget line where the slope is equal to the ratio of the two commodities**.

c。Move along the budget line until the additional utility provided by one commodity is equal to the additional utility provided by the other.

d。Select the indifference curve with the highest utility value within a given budget line.

Choose D14If the marginal cost exceeds the average cost within a certain output range, any increase in the amount of output within that range results in the average cost curve:

a。Rise. b。Decline.

c。No change. d。Depends on market conditions.

Choose A15The tangent points of the isocost line, the isoyield line are important because they mean:

a。At a given level of output, an isocost line representing the lowest possible cost can be found, meaning the lowest cost at that level of output.

b。Given the consumption of a given factor, it is possible to find an isoyield line that represents the maximum possible output, meaning the maximum output that can be achieved at this cost.

c。The minimum possible output is achievable for a given factor consumption.

and B are both right. Pick D.

I can't see what the hell is going on.

Samuelson's Microeconomics is easy to understand, with many examples and rich charts. However, some of the author's views and positions should be distinguished. I read it when I first started learning and thought it was very good, and it was a very good book for beginners.

Pindick's Microeconomics. The level is slightly higher than Samuelson's, which is more suitable for Bu Zaosen's graduate study. The content is also very detailed, with rich examples and charts. In particular, he has a lot of specialized cases.

In short, foreign books pay more attention to examples and understanding, so the books are very thick and look very profound, but they are actually very easy to use.

Domestic: Gao Hongye's "Western Economics (Microeconomics Part) Type Mu" (published by the National People's Congress), compared with foreign countries, it pays more attention to logic, for example, many places use the language of mathematics to explain, the understanding will be deeper, and you may feel a little tasteless (in fact, it is better than imagined). This book is very suitable for China's national conditions, firstly, the language is more in line with our habits, secondly, the teaching system is more orderly and clear, and most importantly, he has something critical of Western economics, and he does not accept it all.

Hehe, it's kind of like a sales pitch)