Who is responsible for the theft of an item? Is there any responsibility for the property if somethi

I'm sorry, but the responsibility is yours.

Let me tell you an example: a person is looking at a car, and if he has something to do at night, he pays ten yuan to ask another person to help him look at the car, and the car is lost, and the responsibility lies with the second person, because there is a de facto labor relationship. But his own anti-theft work is insufficient, and he can't let you lose all of it, I think you have a certain responsibility, not all the responsibility!

So a thousand at most, no more. And I think that "business" is very suspicious! Maybe I'm suspicious by nature.

Brother, this thing was lost when you were there, and you should be more responsible. Be careful next time. If you're not happy to do it, don't do it. You can talk to your boss that you have limited financial means right now. Try to lose as little as possible.

Be responsible! If you run away, it won't be good if people sue you.

It is recommended that the landlord find a legal counsel and ask about the relationship before making a decision.

References"If I lose 2,000 yuan, then I will work for him for nothing for three months", 2,000 yuan in 3 months, this is the sunrise industry we are striving for, the epitome of thousands of solar people, heartache, speechless.

The business just went out) How can it be so coincidental?

But since it's just you.

It's just your responsibility.

It's your negligence that made it like this.

Poor man, I feel sorry for you Compensation of 2,000 yuan, dizzy, how much is your salary if you do it there in a month.

Legal analysis: If the property has fulfilled its safety precautions, then the property is not responsible for the theft of things in the home; If the property fails to fulfill its safety obligations, and the property is responsible for the theft of things at home due to the fault of the property or the parties agree in the contract that the things at home are stolen, the property is responsible.

Legal basis: "Property Management Regulations" Article 35 Property service enterprises shall provide corresponding services in accordance with the provisions of the property service contract.

Where a property management service enterprise fails to perform the provisions of the property management service contract, resulting in damage to the personal or property safety of the owner's friend, it shall bear corresponding legal responsibility in accordance with law.

Legal analysis: If the property has fulfilled its security obligations, then the property is not responsible for the theft of the items in the house; If the property fails to fulfill its safety and precautionary obligations, and the property is responsible for the theft of things at home due to the fault of the property or the failure of both parties to agree in the contract that the things at home are stolen, the property is responsible.

Legal basis: Property Management Regulations Article 35 Property service enterprises shall provide corresponding services in accordance with the provisions of the property service contract.

Where a property management service enterprise fails to perform the provisions of the property management service contract, resulting in damage to the personal and property safety of the owner, it shall bear the corresponding legal responsibility in accordance with law.

Legal analysis: The goods in the supermarket are taken care of by the employees, and the employees have the obligation to take care of the goods. The theft of the supermarket indicates that there is a breach in the security of the supermarket, so the supermarket should be held responsible.

Legal basis: Labor Contract Law of the People's Republic of China Article 39 The employer may terminate the labor contract if the employee falls under any of the following circumstances:

1) During the probationary period, it is proved that they do not meet the employment requirements;

2) Seriously violating the rules and regulations of the employer;

3) Serious dereliction of duty, malpractice for personal gain, causing major damage to the employment of single sheds;

4) The worker establishes labor relations with other employers at the same time, causing a serious impact on the completion of the work tasks of the unit, or refuses to make corrections upon the employer's request;

5) The labor contract chain is invalid due to the circumstances provided for in Item 1, Paragraph 1 of Article 26 of this Law;

6) Those who have been pursued for criminal responsibility in accordance with law.