For those who are stupid, how can they be agile?

I think that first of all, we must have talent, first of all, we must have goods in our minds, we must have deep knowledge accumulation, and we must have deep knowledge accumulation in our brains in order to make frequent allusions, quote classics, bite and chew words, etc., otherwise the mouth will be very powerful and it will be a. Quick-witted people generally have a wide range of interests and hobbies, are well-read, and can export chapters.

I don't think it's better for people who aren't smart"The stupid bird flies first"！Be good at taking the first step, be diligent, spend much more time, energy and effort than others, accumulate a lot, gather armpits into fur, and merge small streams into rivers and seas. With such perseverance, the iron pestle sharpens the needle, accumulates over time, and the soil becomes a mountain.

After all, you will be thick with yourself, have hills and valleys in your chest, become smart, wise, have no regrets in life, live a full life, and survive beautifully!

Personally, I think that if you are not smart, you will be honest and dishonest, dishonest people love to be smart, and they love to be honest when they do things. If you are an honest person, you have to do things wholeheartedly, and you have to figure out how to do things well and efficiently. With the accumulation of experience over a long period of time and your continuous efforts and improvements, your talent and wisdom will be reflected, respected and recognized.

And although being clever will be recognized for a while, it will be punished by exposing the fox's tail.

If you feel that a person is not smart, it is not that his IQ will be low, it may just be that he has not accumulated knowledge and experience. People who are not smart may have a high IQ or be quick-witted. So we can divide people into those who are high in IQ and intelligent; those with high IQ but not smart enough; Not very intelligent but very intelligent; The IQ is not high and at the same time not smart.

In general, agility is only related to IQ, not whether you are smart or not. A person who is quick in thinking is not necessarily smart, and a smart person may not be smart in thinking.

I think that in order to be quick in thinking in the long term and fundamentally, we must study classic books such as "I Ching", logic, and philosophy, master the ability of judgment, reasoning, and association, and improve the ability to use ** and reflective.

Liu Bei's son Liu Adou, the world says that he is a useless person, and Adou who can't be helped, but some scholars believe that it is precisely because of his uselessness that his life was saved, and Adou disguised himself with his "stupidity", so that Wei did not worry about him and did not suspect him, so that he could be alone. So I think that if a person wants to become agile, he should work harder, learn more, and don't always think about getting something for nothing, and stupid people are not always not smart, "The three stinkers also beat Zhuge Liang."

In my opinion, there is no necessary correlation between intelligence and IQ. IQ is a kind of logical reasoning and comprehensive analysis of thinking ability, while intelligence is specifically manifested in the ability to do a certain aspect of things. The better the performance, the smarter the person is in this regard.

For example, so-and-so learns things quickly, which is a kind of cleverness, so-and-so is very smart in doing things, and so on. Some intelligence is directly related to IQ, while some intelligence is the result of accumulated experience.

Everyone wants to be smart, is it really good to be smart? What kind of people are smart, what kind of people are stupid, some people seem to be very smart, but I think they are the stupidest, some people think they are very smart, they like to show off everywhere, thinking about how to calculate others, thinking about pie in the sky. In the end, being smart was mistakenly suffered a big loss by being smart, some people seem to be stupid, but people are diligent and down-to-earth, and in the end they succeeded, how to say this.

Everyone in the Three Kingdoms has seen that Cao Cao's youngest son Cao Zhi is very smart and quick-witted, but in the political struggle, he is too sharp and sharp, and he lost the struggle with Cao Pi, the brother of "who was born from the same root", and finally killed Qingqing because of his cleverness, if Cao Zhi was stupid, he might not die.

I believe that the vast majority of people are not born prodigies or geniuses. Thomas Edison once said, "Genius is one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration!"

Therefore, there is no absolute intelligence in the world, only "diligence" and "laziness"; If there is, it is the result of extraordinary efforts by others.