Is the ancestor of the Chinese really Lucy, an ape from the Great Rift Valley of East Africa?

No, the birthplace of Chinese civilization is the Yellow River. It is not the Great Rift Valley, and the fact that sites older than the Great Rift Valley have been discovered in China shows that the origin of the Chinese has always been in China.

The ancestors of the Chinese should not be Lucy, the Great Rift Valley. Because in early China, the cave people were found to be similar to the Yuanmou people and those of that period.

It's possible. Because many scientists say that the earliest origins of human beings came from Africa. So there's that possibility.

At present, the mainstream view is that the ape Lucy really came out of the African continent, but it is only more likely, according to the current data, there is no evidence to confirm that the ape Lucy is the grandmother of humans. Darwin's theory of evolution is very important for the study of the origin of human beings, and as biologists continue to find out, even Darwin's theory of evolution will still be questioned by many people.

Moreover, there is still some controversy about whether or not the origin of human beings came from Africa. However, some fossils can prove that humans may have come from Africa, but why human ancestors originated in Africa remains to be considered, and there will be no answer, after all, there is very little information about this.

From the fossils, it can be seen that humans in Eurasia were not directly born into what they were, but evolved into what they are now. Even for a long time, humanity was extinct. Therefore, after the emergence of historical faults, it is very difficult for human beings to find the origin of human beings through archaeology.

However, whether humanity went into hiding or was truly extinct remains to be determined. If human avocados were just hiding, then no traces of them have been discovered so far. And this discovery can prove that human beings at that time actually developed under different territories, not only on the African continent.

Until now, human fossils have not been found in Eurasia, so judging from various sources, it is very likely that humans were in Africa at that time, and Africa may have been more suitable for human development and reproduction at that time. It is actually very difficult for living beings to give birth to intelligence.

Moreover, there are still many questions about why human beings were able to develop wisdom and master tools. However, from the perspective of environmental science, when human beings evolved, they actually had a certain direction, and if the environment was relatively harsh, then human beings would not be able to live in groups at all. In general, it is only in a relatively large group life that wisdom can be born.

Definitely not, Lucy is only the ancestor of the Africans, while the Chinese ancestors are the cave people of Beijing, the ancestors of the yellow race.

The current prevailing view is that Lucy the gorilla is indeed from the African continent, but this is only a relatively high probability. Based on current data, there is no evidence that Lucy the gorilla is the grandmother of humans. Darwin's theory of evolution is very useful for studying the origins of man, and biologists have found through constant testing that even Darwin's theory of evolution will still be questioned by many.

We can only think that Lucy is in the same vein as modern humans, and it cannot be said that Lucy is the ancestor of the Chinese.

I think it's probably the same kind, but it doesn't necessarily have to be evolved from Africa.

Personally, I don't think so, Lucy is just a foreign culture, it's their interpretation of human beings, we have our Chinese interpretation, for example, the Bodhisattva uses mud to pinch people.

It should be from Lucy, and it is said that all human beings are from Africa. Then the ancestors of China are also there, which is very normal, which can further prove that Chinese ancestors are also there.

After Darwin proposed the theory of evolution, it has helped us study the origin of human beings for more than 200 years, but as biologists continue to find new clues in geological investigations, Darwin's theory of evolution has also been questioned by many people. There is still a controversy in the biological community, that is, whether the origin of human beings is the first in Africa. The prevailing view is that Lucy, the grandmother of mankind, did indeed come out of the African continent.

But why he gave birth to wisdom and developed a powerful race on the Eurasian continent remains a mystery. <>

It seems to me that it is really possible that the ancestors of human beings came from Africa, because of various fossil evidence. Human beings in Eurasia are not directly born into what they are. There was even a time when humanity in Eurasia was directly wiped out, and for a long time there was a historical fault.

This poses a great problem for some archaeologists to prove whether humans in Eurasia were extinct or in secrecy during this period. <>

Because if the humans were just hiding, and we don't find their remains now. That would prove that humanity actually developed in their own territories, not through the African continent. But until now, biologists have not found any remains of these intelligent races in Eurasia to support their claims.

On the contrary, it is those who support the ancestral school on the continent, which proves this not only from fossils everywhere, but also from the manifestations of evolutionary characteristics at that time. Africa was more suitable for human development and reproduction at that time. <>

We all know that it is very difficult for human beings to produce wisdom, and until now, there have been questions about why human beings can master the tools and give birth to wisdom. However, from the perspective of the environment, the evolution of human beings also has a certain direction, if the environment is harsh, then human beings will be exhausted, and it is impossible to form a race. Only when the scale of the ethnic group is large can it be possible to give birth to intelligent human bodies in it.

OK. The evolution of living things is natural selection, and even without the Great Rift Valley, the evolution of apes in other regions would not have been affected.

It is possible, because the times are constantly progressing and changing, and even without the Great Rift Valley apes, they could have slowly evolved into the humans they are now.

Lucy, is the generic name for the specimen AL 288-1. This specimen has about 40% of the Australopithecus alphabet skeleton, a female in her 20s who was estimated to have given birth to a child based on the condition of the pelvis, and was discovered by Donald Johansen et al. in 1974 in Hadar in the Awash Valley at the bottom of the Afar Valley in Ethiopia. Paleoanthropological research generally finds only fossil fragments, and rarely intact skulls or ribs; The discovery of AL 288-1 is therefore particularly important, providing a wealth of scientific evidence for paleoanthropological research.

Lucy lived about 3.2 million years ago and is classified as a human race, and "Lucy" belongs to the Australopithecus Alpha species, which is considered a landmark discovery in the field of human origin research.

However, it should be noted that Lucy lived 3.2 million years ago and was considered to be the first human to be found to walk upright until June 21, 2010, but Dr. Yonanis Halli-Selassier, director of the National Museum of History in Cleveland, USA, led an international team of researchers to find an incomplete early human skeleton 3.6 million years ago in Ethiopia. This early human skeleton is 400,000 years older than the famous "Lucy" skeleton and is significantly larger. The research team determined that this early human was able to walk upright, thus advancing the evolution of what scientists previously thought humans were walking upright.

This early human skeleton is known as "Grandfather Lucy" (kadanuumuu).

According to archaeological findings, Lucy's pelvic bones have a wide hip bone and a thick femur of the lower limb bones, all of which indicate that Lucy can walk upright, and that Lucy belongs to ancient humans rather than apes

Therefore, b