A good man just can t fight back, can t he scold back, and don t have a penny in his pocket?

Updated on society 2024-07-09
2 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    When I saw the first half of the sentence "A good man just can't fight back, he can't scold back", I still slightly agree with it in my heart, but when I saw the second half of the sentence "I don't have a penny in my pocket." I wanted to laugh, a little exaggerated.

    In my mind, I have the opinion that I can't fight back, and in terms of my own criteria for choosing a mate, I don't mind arguing (I mean bickering) but, in my opinion, a man can't hit a woman under any circumstances!! A man is not allowed to hit a woman under any circumstances!! A man is not allowed to hit a woman under any circumstances!!

    The important thing is said three times, really, in my opinion, hands-on is a matter of choice, and it is absolutely and absolutely unforgivable. I even felt that if my partner did something to me after I got married, I would choose to divorce.

    I may be a greenhouse flower, my family is very happy, my parents rarely quarrel, they are very affectionate, every time my mother loses her temper will scold my father, but my father is the kind of person who loves his wife very much, after he retires, my mother washes the dishes only a handful of times, let alone do housework, and my sister also got married last year, my brother-in-law is also very fond of my sister, my brother-in-law is the kind of person who does not like to talk, especially silent, but he can become a chatter in front of my sister.

    I'm also influenced by my family, I don't really care too much about half of the future financial income, just get by, there's no need to be too rich. But you must be good to me, this is the most fundamental and important thing.

    Therefore, in my opinion, a good man must cook and not fight back, not necessarily scolding or not returning, as for not having a penny in his pocket, it is too exaggerated, but the economic conditions are generally okay.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    I think a good man should be responsible, responsible, and capable of work. When he is at home, he is conscientious, responsible, and attentive to his family, and cares about his wife and loves his wife. Manly and able to make his wife dependent.

    Trustworthy, able to support the family and the sky, I think this is a good man. <>

    To be honest, I think men should have a manly spirit. Like the kind of man who can't fight back, scolds and doesn't fight back, and then has no money in his pocket. I'm actually quite despised for it.

    I don't think it's a good man, it's a sign of cowardice. Of course, this kind of strict wife is the same as what we usually say. This type of man is different.

    Wife is strict, what we are saying is that he is very strong outside, but he is very tolerant of his wife at home, which is a manifestation of loving his wife and loving his wife, but this kind of man. My first reaction was cowardice. I think the average family should not beat their husbands.

    And then I won't give my husband a penny, and if there is really a husband in the family who is in this situation, I think this husband is a failure. It will make me think that this husband is the kind of man who has no action, no responsibility, no sense of responsibility, and then is very cowardly and has always relied on his wife. I look down on this kind of man, so I don't think he's a good man.

    A really good man loves his wife very much, and then cares about his wife. But there is a degree to this, and he himself can understand when he should take responsibility and when he should coax his wife, and he will not say that it is for his wife to make himself very unmanly and lose himself. In the usual family, he can resolve the conflict with his wife very well, and when his wife scolds her, he can coax his wife to admit her mistakes, let his wife, and tolerate his wife.

    Usually pay part of the salary to the wife. A man who can be relied on by his wife in major situations in the family, is very responsible, and has a sense of responsibility. In short, it is responsible, masculine, and responsible.

    A man who can take care of his wife and let his wife be a good man.

Related questions
17 answers2024-07-09

Your so-called beating is gentle, then forgive him, after all, you are in love, it can be seen from your words, you seem to have lived together, maybe he is just a little joke, don't take it too seriously, his face is okay, after the fight must be a grinning face, right? >>>More

50 answers2024-07-09

The man must have known how to be humble.

When I was in school, my class leader girl hit him. >>>More

18 answers2024-07-09

In marriage, it does not mean that a good man should put his wife first in everything, but that your family comes first。Because for the sake of the family, you can give up some career things appropriately, and naturally you can also change some emotional things appropriately, because two people are called a family together, and a man who is completely wife-centered is not responsible for the family. <> >>>More

22 answers2024-07-09

Really don't teach children to hit people! Now he is just cowardly and doesn't dare to hit anyone, in case one day he returns and wins, then your child may be difficult to stop! Boys, in particular, have an aggressive mentality, and if your child doesn't fight back, it doesn't mean that he won't be aggressive. >>>More

19 answers2024-07-09

Men are sex-based, but the methods are different, men have sex first, then love, women have love first, then sex, the second time there is such a requirement, it's not very strange, it's just this person, you have to think about it, and I think the chance of breaking up in the end may be very large.