What is the first cause in Buddhism, is the Buddha Buddha?

There is no first cause, and samsara is like a circle without a beginning and an end. If you think that there must be a first cause that drives the events that follow, then what is it that drives the first cause to arise? If you were asking why there was reincarnation and how to get out of samsara, the Buddha's answer was that it was because of ignorance that it led to samsara.

As long as all sentient beings get rid of their ignorance, then there will be no more samsara.

When the body is the outer one, yin and yang (non-causality), the nature is constant and the nature is the same. The first cause is the delusion of ordinary people.

The universe comes from being, not from nothing, just as the formation of a stool requires wood first, and wood needs seeds.

Amitabha!

3-dimensional world inference algorithm].

It is recommended that you practice the Pure Land Method, be reborn in the Elysian World, and ask Amitabha!

The Buddha often advised people that our wisdom is not profound enough, so we are called human beings, and that we should not think about the wisdom of the Buddha with human thinking. That's all delusion.

For example, beings in the one-dimensional world (like a point, there is no left and right, up and down, front and back) who cannot understand the beings of the two-dimensional world (like a line, which can only move forward, not up and down, and this person who has studied mathematical axes should understand it) can move around. In the same way, people in the two-dimensional world can't understand the life of our three-dimensional world, their cognition only stays on a plane, and they don't have the concept of height, so if you tell them, we have a height of 1.8 meters, and we are very strong. 1.8m?

Robust? These concepts are based on the perspective of three-dimensional dimensions, but they don't have this concept, and they don't need these concepts in the two-dimensional world, so they can't understand us.

In the same way, the Buddha tells us that the universe theoretically has infinite dimensions, which is so powerful and difficult to understand. Although scientists are also working hard, but so far, only 11 dimensions have been discovered, but it is very smart to understand that there is dark matter in the universe, and this dark matter may be other dimensions of the universe, they are composed of another kind of energy, and our naked eye can only accept the light of the three-dimensional world, so we can't see it, and some people can't see it, so they say no, say it's superstition, and say that these are superstitions.

That's why a lot of great Buddhists have warned us, don't dwell on these profound questions, these things, explain to you what you can do, what you won't understand, and what if you don't understand, this is actually equivalent to, if we don't understand human beings or the meaning, won't we eat? Don't drink water? No, we have to eat and drink water and study at the same time.

Here's the truth.

Therefore, many colleagues who study Buddhism have sighed, practice hard, and be reborn in the Western Elysium, ** There is Amitabha, the king of ten thousand Buddhas, we ask this good teacher face to face, and what this teacher said will not be wrong.

When the teacher in the world talks about this profound question, we are worried that it will be wrong, why? No matter how clever a teacher he is, he is just a human being, and human wisdom is always biased. It's a clever idea, it's wise, and we can't afford not to know it.

Therefore, I would like to advise the landlord not to be obsessed with this issue.

Amitabha!

I have seen two more statements on the Internet, which are quoted below:

1.3. Look at the world from the beginning.

It is from the perspective of dependent arising that Buddhism asserts that there is no first cause in the world. Because everything in the world is a combination of conditions, and as far as the conditions themselves are concerned, they are interdependent, and there is no initial condition. As far as the clothes we wear are concerned, it is made up of cotton yarn, dye, textile workers and machines, tailors, and so on.

This also shows that there is no so-called first cause in the world. So, Buddhism denies that the world has a beginning, that the world has a primordial origin called the beginning.

Why did the ancient Greeks claim that the world has a primordial principle? It is judged from the perspective of limited life experience. As far as each of us is concerned, there seems to be a starting point when we are born on a certain day, at what age we start studying, and at what age we start working.

Based on this kind of empirical thinking, they think that the creation of the world also has a origin and a starting point. Buddhism, on the other hand, looks at the world from the perspective of dependent origination, and holds that the world is a union of causes and conditions, and that there is no first cause, so there is no original beginning. Therefore, taking God or Allah as the first cause of the creation of the world is untenable in Buddhism."

2.The Buddhist scriptures say that the world is formed by the karma of all beings. Of course, it's not the karma of any one sentient being, but the collective karmic feeling of all sentient beings.

The collective karma of all beings creates a whirlwind in the universe:"Jue Ming is empty, and treats each other into a shake, so there is a wind wheel to hold the world"。Then the whirlwind rotated in the air and the phenomenon of wind and clouds appeared, and the clouds gathered thicker and thicker, and began to rain heavily.

In Buddhist scriptures, this whirlwind that appears first is called a wind wheel, and the heavy rain that comes from it is called a water wheel. The wind wheel blows the many fine dust in the air together, and then the power of the water wheel condenses various substances, and after a long time, the rudiments of the world begin to appear. After the formation of the world, after nineteen small eons, the sentient beings of the Three Realms and the Six Realms gradually appeared, which was the tribulation.

There is a contradiction between these two statements.

Everyone agrees on which.

I feel that the Diamond Sutra has a special affinity with China, chanting the Sutra, reciting the Diamond Sutra; Speakers, happily talk about the Diamond Sutra; Musical notes, love diamonds. Since Master Kumarajiva translated it into Chinese, through the Northern and Southern Dynasties, until the Ming and Qing dynasties, people have had the "Diamond Sutra" in Confucius's "Analects" of Confucianism and Taoism "morality" regarded as the collection and publication of the three.

Buddhist scriptures

What is the structure of everything in the world? Western philosophy believes that everything in the world is made up of two sides of contradictions, and the relationship between the two is the unity of opposites. Unlike Western philosophy, the main theme of the Diamond Sutra is to emphasize its unity, completely negating the contradiction between the two.

Chinese philosophy believes that everything in the world is composed of yin and yang, and it is the unity of yin and yang, which is the mutual root of yin and yang. Unlike Chinese philosophy, the main theme of the Diamond Sutra is to see only the mutual roots of yin and yang, and completely negate the antagonistic relationship between the two sides.

The negation of "quantitative change" and "the negation of negation", the result of six rounds of regression, justice and balance. In the language of "Dream of Red Mansions", the result is "feed the forest like a bird, and the land is clean." ”

The pros and cons are empty, the so-called Buddhism, Buddhism is called following Buddhism. Buddhism is called the "ideology" of Buddhism, and the philosophical foundations of Buddhism and the Diamond Sutra formula are the "theoretical foundations".

Buddhism uses the "First Truth" (First Truth) to explain the state of birth and death (birth and death and emptiness) of the Ten Directions and the Third World (the universal world).

Truth is the truth of truth; "The First Truth" means the first truth of all the laws.

Therefore, the First Truth is also known as the True Truth, the Profound Truth, the Truthfulness, the Truthfulness, the Reality, the Middle Way, the Dharma Realm, the Vacuum, and so on.

If we talk about it in a relative way, there are two truths: the true truth (the first truth) and the mundane truth (worldly truth, worldly truth).

The Worldly Truth says that there are sentient beings, and the First Truth says that all sentient beings have nothing.

Since there is nothing pure, why do you suddenly give birth to mountains and rivers and the earth?

There is a careful explanation in the Lengyan Sutra, in short, it will happen successively after the heart is moved.

Therefore, there is a considerable difference between the "first meaning" in Buddhism and the "first cause" in the general definition.

Human life and death are reincarnated, and cause and effect are cyclical. In the present thought, it can be called the first cause. The first cause is considered to be the cause, but it is generally used in the process of analyzing and minding the whole mind when it makes a mistake. Generally going back to the cause of something is called the first cause.

I don't know if this word exists. But there is a specific meaning for him.

Brother, your question is straightforward, like an arrow, straight to the bull's-eye.

Since it is said that everything arises from causes, then the first cause must exist. Since existence has a phase, there is a phase, and there is a cause if there is a phase. Therefore, if you can't answer it, you don't understand the origin.

The theory of the origin of the liquid silver is based on the Three Dharma Seals, with the 12 dependent originations, the Four Noble Truths, and the Noble Eightfold Path as the center.

Let's take a look at the three Dharma seals first: all dharmas have no self, all actions are impermanent, and nirvana is silent. When we talk about everything, we can't talk about it with me as the center; When we talk about development and change, we can't talk about it from a static point of view. This embodies the spirit of seeking truth from facts, and also embodies the viewpoint of development.

If we look at the theory of dependent arising from a static point of view, the first cause you want to ask is undoubtedly only the word "ignorance", but this is like a cycle of "chicken or egg", and the argument is not valid.

If we do not look at the theory of dependent arising from a static point of view, where everything develops and changes, without beginning or end, then we will never find the first cause. However, precisely because there is no beginning and no end, the Buddha advocated breaking through ignorance, recognizing one's own nature, returning to one's true self, and finally attaining the stillness of nirvana, which is immortal and immortal. It is precisely because the Buddha pointed out the path of enlightenment to relieve the Buddha's stupidity that we have the origin of the enlightenment, which is the first cause of the enlightenment

Breaking ignorance".