Do any fake poor students in your school cheat money?

Of course, they all have a good relationship with the school, and the real poor students are not particularly outstanding and have no money at all, so we can only reflect the situation of the school to a higher department.

Yes, there are a few poor students in each class, those pseudo-poor students. I used a high-end mobile phone. We should reflect this kind of situation like the school and give money to those who need it.

This kind of thing is too common in our school, whoever is popular will have more votes, and our class is like this, we should get together and discuss it well, and give money to those who really need it.

This is really there, there are several pseudo-poor students in my class, who say that their families are very poor, but they are dressed brightly, and we must unite to fight this kind of behavior. Be fair when voting.

There must be. This is the case in the next class, where the poor students selected are all holding good mobile phones and wearing famous brands. We should collectively complain to the school about them.

I used to be in charge of collecting all kinds of fees in the class, and collecting the students' insurance fees at a time. There were 2 people in the class who said that their family was on subsistence allowance, that they had more supermarkets than me, and that they were using mid-to-high-end mobile phones, so we had to take the matter to the Education Bureau.

Our school has, they have a good relationship with the class teacher, the class leader, you can be qualified, I think it's very unfair, we should ask in front of the class teacher why do they give poverty subsidies to those who have money? If the head teacher can't get off the stage, the problem will be solved.

My college classmates have gold bracelets, gold rings, national grants, and give snacks to the whole class when they vote, and I really hate this kind of behavior, and we have to report it to the principal. Severe punishment for such acts.

There must be a lot of people, those people are actually very rich, the last time I voted for poor students in my class, several people who were very rich in the family went up to run, we must vote strictly, and distribute the money to those who are really poor.

Hahaha, there must be, and there are a lot of them.

Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 266.

Where the crime of fraud defrauds public or private property, and the amount is relatively large, a sentence of up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release is to be given, and/or a fine;

where the amount is huge or there are other serious circumstances, a sentence of between 3 and 10 years imprisonment is to be given, and a concurrent fine;

where the amount is especially huge or there are other especially serious circumstances, a sentence of 10 or more years imprisonment or indefinite imprisonment is to be given, and a concurrent fine or property is to be confiscated. Where this Law has other provisions quietly, follow those provisions.

Legal Analysis: Full recovery will be made if fraud is discovered.

Article 266 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China: Where the crime of fraud defrauds public or private property, and the amount is relatively large, a sentence of up to three years imprisonment, detention without suffocation, or controlled release is to be given, and/or a fine; where the amount is huge or there are other serious circumstances, a sentence of between 3 and 10 years imprisonment is to be given, and a concurrent fine; where the amount is especially huge or there are other especially serious circumstances, a sentence of 10 or more years imprisonment or indefinite imprisonment is to be given, and a concurrent fine or confiscation of property.

Because they all think that places cannot be wasted. At this time of year, all universities will evaluate poor students for the new semester and award a significant number of scholarships。This time, I found that a lot of students who seemed to be wealthy suddenly became poor.

Is it true that there are so many poor students in college? It cannot be denied that in universities, some students have poor family financial conditions and need financial support. However, it cannot be denied that there are indeed a lot of fake good and poor people who receive quite a few scholarships.

There are also false poor students, so that **cannot simply criticize** and cannot question the system. We cannot simply criticize the moral aspirations of these students. The main reason for this problem is that it is more difficult to identify poor students.

University students often come from all over the country. When a student writes a scholarship application, it is difficult for the school to confirm the student's specific family situation. The student's civil department seal and school-issued certificate are also large, making it difficult to distinguish the authenticity.

Because there are difficulties in verification, and the school is afraid of problems, please close your eyes and ignore this link. In this way, students can immediately return to extreme poverty before they are released from their former wealthy families. Moreover, the identities of poor students are often discussed only by the class committee and their classmates, and many students escape responsibility because the school does not supervise them.

More importantly, scholarships are awarded in the form of school-to-division, and division-to-school year and class indicators. Eventually, the number of poor students may make up more than 10% of the total number of classes, but if the proportion of poor students does not reach the upper limit, the quota will be wasted.

This is associated with the farce of advisors or class committees encouraging everyone to write an application. Even if some classes are generally wealthy, they will simply ask for a change of class application, because the scholarship is used as class fees, so some wealthy class fees will reach tens of thousands of yuan. This all-purpose allocation indicator will not only cause a waste of scholarships, but also may lead to students who really need scholarships not being able to receive scholarships due to special circumstances.

Moreover, the psychology of not wasting names also contributes to the situation of fish in problematic waters, and even carnivals and tea tastings are used to apply for scholarships. The most basic way to solve the problem is to verify the student's family situation and eliminate the luck of speculators. This verification is actually quite difficult, and although it incurs a lot of additional costs, it can effectively prevent students from speculating in the long run.

It's normal, now that there are fewer poor people, there are places to occupy them.

Of course, I've graduated from college now, from my junior high school to college, there have been pseudo-poor students, of course, I can't say that they are cheating money, after all, they are not particularly rich, I can only say that they are not poor.

Those pseudo-poor students are actually shameful, although the number of places in the school is wasted if they don't need to be dropped, but it is precisely because of these pseudo-poor students that many really poor students lack opportunities, and the poverty funds allocated by ** cannot help those who really need help.

When I was in junior high school and high school, there were very few people in our class who applied for subsidies for poor students, although there were few applicants, but there were fewer places, and the conditions for applying were actually very simple, as long as you went to the town to open a certificate, so our teachers will give people subsidies for poor students according to their grades, more people are 1,000 yuan, and less people are 5 or 600. In fact, no one will check the authenticity of poverty, so it is very likely that there will be a situation where pseudo-poor students get subsidies for poor students, while those who are really poor have nothing.

I feel that in the face of such a phenomenon, the most important thing is to increase the intensity of supervision. The teachers of the school can roughly supervise and weed out the pseudo-poor students who are obviously cheating money. If it does not meet the requirements, it will be sent back to the school, tell the school that these lists do not meet the requirements, and let the school deal with it.

If there really is a phenomenon of pseudo-poor students cheating money, then it is necessary to crack down on it, and it is necessary to focus on education for these students. I believe that only if every link is implemented, this phenomenon will be much better, compared to such a small amount of money, students are more concerned about the image in the minds of their classmates.

I think the phenomenon of pseudo-poor students cheating money should be in many schools, the existence of this phenomenon is completely driven by interests, not to mention students, some parents may also support their children to cheat money, otherwise where did those supporting materials come from! Therefore, in addition to the improvement of supervision, I feel that parents should also increase their quality!

Recently, it was also revealed on the Internet that as long as the consumption of a school's canteen is less than how much money is lower than every month, the school will treat it as a poor student, and a sum of money will be put into it every month to support them. It can be said that it has achieved a real ...... of "targeted poverty alleviation".

Of course, as long as you are willing to work hard, there are always more ways than problems. In addition to inspecting the poverty alleviation targets, it is also necessary to supervise the people responsible for the issuance and review of grants to prevent them from colluding with each other, resulting in those who really need help not receiving the help they deserve.

When studying in school, a poor student is selected, and the selected student will have a scholarship of several thousand yuan. I was only introduced to this state-supported program when I was in high school. But at that time, there were very few pseudo-poor students, because the real poor students may not be able to get this fund, let alone pseudo-poor students!

After all, when I was in high school, all kinds of money-giving projects were selected by the homeroom teacher based on grades, and occasionally we were asked to vote for a vote, which was just a formality.

When I arrived at university, I learned that the selection of various support funds for poor students can be fair and just. When I was in college, I was very strict in selecting poor students. Generally speaking, those with subsistence allowances, single-parent families, or those with disabilities will be selected first, but these must also be accompanied by various relevant certificates.

So on the whole, it's still relatively formal.

But how many low-income families, single-person families and disabled people are there in a profession? And there are often more than ten or twenty places in a class. So in the end, there will still be a group of people fishing in troubled waters, that is, pseudo-poor students.

After all, now the relevant ** institutions that write in the home will still sign and seal, and no one will really investigate your family.

This situation will make many students with really poor family conditions have some unwarranted competitive pressure. At that time, in our school, teachers often asked students to read their own poverty certificates, although this would be a bit embarrassing, but it was definitely the most effective way to determine the authenticity of poor students. Because people from really poor families have feelings when they read their certificates, while pseudo-poor students will only have embarrassing emotions in them, after all, they are all nonsense stories.

Then there is another way that is also very effective, that is, the counselor sends some students he trusts to do eyeliner to see if the electronic products that those who apply for poor students usually use are all ** items, so that they can quickly be distinguished.

In our school, there was a person who changed an iPhone a year to apply for a bursary for poor students, and then the money was taken back by the school. For the first time, I felt that the school was quite fair!

Legal Separation Silver Analysis:

If fraud is found, the full amount will be recovered.

The law is based on the law of jujube;

Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China" Article 266:Where the crime of fraud defrauds public or private property, and the amount is relatively large, a sentence of up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release is to be given, and/or a fine; where the amount is huge or there are other serious circumstances of friendly burial and demolition, a sentence of between 3 and 10 years imprisonment and a concurrent fine is to be given; where the amount is especially huge or there are other especially serious circumstances, a sentence of 10 or more years imprisonment or indefinite imprisonment is to be given, and a concurrent fine or confiscation of property.