The relationship between Zonggao s Zonggao and the thought of Zhuangzi

The mainstream position is that Zhuangzi's thought is escapist and negative, and he is unwilling to face reality. Such an explanation is not fabricated out of thin air, but has historical evidence, ** After the establishment of the centralized system, the living environment of the ancient Chinese literati was very bad, and many people were depressed under the oppression of imperial culture, Du Fu is a clear proof, so the ancient literati needed a spiritual backyard to alleviate the oppression of reality.

This created an opportunity for Zhuangzi's doctrine, because Zhuangzi did not "know what he could not do" like Confucius, and for the ancient literati, Zhuangzi was not so much their spiritual backyard as spiritual opium.

The non-mainstream position is: Zhuangzi is a very strong thought, because he expresses an attitude rather than a method, Zhuangzi's thought is to enter the world with a mentality of escapism, then "Getaway" is literally unable to see its connotation, negativity is actually just a very superficial interpretation, "Kun is so big, I don't know how many thousands of miles" is not simply about the size of Kun; The "decisive and flying, and the gun and the elm stopping" is not simply a comparison of their flight altitudes. Its intrinsic meaning is to adjust people's thinking to an extremely high realm to examine all things in the universe and all kinds of disputes in the world, which is beyond space and time, and ordinary people simply cannot reach it.

Therefore, most descendants see it as a negative attitude towards the world.

Zhuangzi's thought can be summed up in one sentence: those who do nothing do nothing.

Although I knew that he was a Taoist, I had never read a Taoist book. However, according to the legends of the rivers and lakes, I think that his thoughts are the same as Lao Tzu: Wuwei ......

In fact, it can be said that the human mind is indifferent and inactive, and there may not be many people who can truly understand its profundity. How much of the ancient Chinese civilization is left in the eyes of today's new humans? I don't know if the times have really progressed, but all I can feel is as if dross is covering the essence.

More and more garbage is pouring into our poor nerves, completely overwhelmed! (Some gloomy, just a personal opinion).

Escapism, spiritual freedom

b The imagination of "Getaway" is strange and grotesque, full of romance, the pursuit of going with the flow and having nothing to rely on, and finally gaining infinite freedom.

Getaway from transcending time and space, clarifying the inevitable into du

hand, preaching the magic of freedom: the big flying dao thousands of miles of Peng bird, the small back to the Shu and the dove answer, everything in the world is to be treated without freedom; Only by eliminating the boundary between matter and self, swimming in infinity without waiting, and reaching the realm of selflessness, meritlessness, and namelessness, is absolute freedom, and this is a leisurely journey.

Personally, I think I choose B

b: Pursue absolute self.

Reason. In order to pursue absolute freedom, it is necessary to get rid of the shackles of the world and carry out the transformation of the mind. The fable of Kun Changpeng is the transformation of the heart and soul.

Such a change is a difficult one, and it cannot be understood by the shallow and short-sighted. Therefore, there is a move of the scorpion and the dove to laugh at the Dapeng migration to the south of the underworld. The little bird knows the ambition of the roc.

Knowing the effect of an official, the line is better than a township, virtue is a monarch, and the flow of those who conquer a country is not as good as Song Rongzi and Liezi. But Song Rongzi and Liezi also have something to do, and they can't reach the realm of having nothing to be free of. Only the supreme man, the man of God, and the saint can truly reach the realm of leisure.

Zhuangzi's main ideas are "Heavenly Dao Wu Wei", relative epistemology, unconditional spiritual freedom, etc. His ideas belong to the system of idealism. He exaggerated the relativity of all things one-sidedly, denied the differences between objective things, denied objective truth, and moved towards relativism in epistemology.

Starting from this epistemology, his attitude towards life is: everything is in accordance with nature, and everything is in order, knowing that it is helpless and peaceful. Politically, he advocated the rule of inaction, opposed all social systems, and rejected all cultural knowledge.

Zhuangzi's thought was developed from Laozi's thought, and he developed Laozi's Tao into subjective idealism and naïve dialectics into relativism.

His interpretation of "Dao" is more mysterious, believing that "Dao" is a "non-material" that is "born from nature", and is a spiritual thing, and he leads Lao Tzu's view of the transformation of opposites to the extreme, believing that no matter the size, length, high or low, beauty and ugliness, success and destruction, all differences do not exist, based on this view, he believes that "the world is nothing greater than the end of the autumn, and Taishan is small; Mo lived for a child (a child who died young), while Peng Zu (the longest-lived person in the legend) died young. This confuses the distinction between size and longevity, denies the qualitative prescriptiveness of things, and moves towards the relativism of "no differences" and "all things are the same". So he proposed, "Fang is born and dies, and Fang is dead and is born......Yes and there, he is also; He is also wrong, and this is also wrong".

That is to say, you don't have to ask about right and wrong, life and death are the same, and you can show pessimism and misanthropy. He not only believes that "Qi is right and wrong", "Qi all things", and even "Qi things and me", as he said: "Heaven and earth are born together with me, and all things are one with me", entering the realm of mysticism, everything is unknowable.

As a representative of the declining class, he tried his best to escape from reality and pursue absolute spiritual freedom to reach the realm of "real people". In order to become a "real person", one must be able to "sit and forget", that is, to completely forget oneself, to eliminate the self in the spiritual illusion, to be one with heaven and earth in spirit, to be one with all things, to completely liberate the interests and harms, gains and losses, reputation, right and wrong in the world, to obtain absolute freedom spiritually, and to enter the realm of leisurely travel.

The negative and decadent side of Lao Zhuang's thought later became the first in the spiritual world of all declining and frustrated classes or groups.

Confucius and Mencius are Confucianists, Lao Zhuang is Taoist, and I personally think that Lao Tzu is the most intelligent and wise person, "Lao Tzu is the first in the world"! Zhuangzi was a promoter of Taoism, pursuing spiritual detachment and freedom. In fact, there are some similarities between the ideas of Shakya and Taoism, both seek spiritual liberation, and emphasize the divine rather than the form.

In addition, I personally think that the bravest is Cao Zhi, and the knife holder can become a poem in seven steps with the knife on his neck. . .

I want to say that you don't understand the thought of the real Zhuangzi at all.

I feel that Zhuangzi is the kind of person who is unkempt and comes with everything, probably thinking that people should maintain their original posture, and should not change themselves because of power and money, and force themselves to do what they are not willing to do......

Am I talking about Zhuangzi?

It's not very clear, ......Roughly meaning......Comprehend the spirit ......

In the "Zhuangzi", there is a "Getaway".

It makes it clear that there is no surreal freedom of life.

There is no such thing as absolute freedom in the world.

Zhuangzi is a person who "multiplies things to play with the mind", and then "can communicate with the spirit of heaven and earth alone".

In such a troubled world, he sees through life and death, beyond fame and fortune, and he is actually a very honest and upright person morally.

Spiritually at ease, so physically, he also tries to achieve a kind of free and easy state that can be achieved without relying on external forces; Zhuangzi advocates that everything in the universe has an equal nature, and that man is integrated into all things, thus ending with the universe. Zhuangzi advocated that the master of life, that is, the human spirit should obey the laws of nature, and should be at peace with the times; Zhuangzi demanded that attention be paid to the cultivation of inner virtue, which is sufficient, and life naturally flows with a self-sufficient spiritual power.

Zhuangzi's thought is a kind of one-person freedom-centered, with everyone in the world as a radial sphere in a straight line, which can be infinitely enlarged or contracted over time.

His mind has a bit of a Zen flavor, that is, to let go of everything in order to pick up freedom!

Hehe, it's not much use for you to ask.

It's just a matter of opinion.

The answer here is certainly one-sided.

It's better to search for hundreds of smiles.

As for what the old Zen master said.

Let's memorize it for the sake of grades.

The teacher said that Confucius was good.

When you talk about Lao Tzu, you say that Lao Tzu is so slippery.

Forget all about yourself and yourself, and devote all your body and mind to the pursuit of the punctuality with a hidden goal, and this person will be completely invincible - the basic interpretation of "ten thousand armies can win the commandery, but the husband cannot win the ambition"!

Zhuangzi's words are to show that the really powerful people are things they don't care about and have nothing to rely on.

If I figured it out, I should go to Lao Tzu and them.

The great task of descending from heaven will surely make me move forward.

Tsk ......Such a big question, put it in the know, I can only serve the courage of Ya! Secondly, there must be a brave man under the resuspension, Ya's reward is zero, Ya is a good hand at soy sauce, right?

Li Zehou's "Aesthetic Journey" may be helpful to you.

Zhuangzi ruled by inaction, and everything was close to nature.

Taoism is a philosophical point of view.

Taoism is a religion.

Taoism is very good, it is a true philosophy, it makes people reasonable.

However, after Dong Zhongshu deposed the hundred schools.

Confucianism became orthodox.

Taoism is excellent, but it cannot be formally continued.

It is only circulated among the people.

After misinformation apotheosis developed.

So it became Taoism.