The universe began as a singularity, the first cosmic singularity, or the first space time

Many modern axioms about the universe are theoretical assumptions, but every scholar is pursuing the answer to the ultimate pole of the universe, your language is very logical, first of all, I don't agree that the universe is a singularity, but from your point of view, according to what you said, a point, the inside is painted, otherwise it is just a circle, then space does not exist in the universe, but how to store the point here, I guess it should be said that the universe itself has a "rotten" substance, And this kind of matter is the border of the universe for us, it slowly corrodes outward, the illusion outside the universe is corroded, and the matter is left blank, which becomes space, because the surface area becomes larger, so the matter becomes thinner and thinner, and finally the matter can only maintain its own state in the smallest form, and the space is squeezed by the non-space again.

It's not enough to say that we don't even recognize the most basic things, I always feel that there is something missing in the universe, but I don't know very well, I hope that I can uncover your answer in my lifetime, and understand the ultimate answer, but once I understand, I think the real end is coming, because the universe has lost its meaning of existence, and human beings have lost the goal of struggle.

It feels like this is just a hypothesis of modern so-called science, and the real situation may be much more complicated, or even simpler. If you like to study science, don't get into the horns, take a step back and open the sky. Einstein's theories weren't necessarily correct.

It's just a relatively reliable assertion that human beings can think of at this stage. Human beings haven't even studied the earth thoroughly, so isn't it a leopard to summarize theories in front of the vast universe? When I was a kid, I always wondered why the Loch Ness Monster couldn't be caught.

Wouldn't you see it if you drained the waters of Loch Ness? The truth is that humans don't have that ability at all. The power of man is too insignificant in the face of nature.

I remember watching the Discovery Channel's hypothesis about the universe, which seemed to say that there were only hydrogen atoms at the beginning, and in the instant, they were ejected in all directions. It spreads tens of light-years in just a few seconds. Isn't it true that the fastest speed in the universe is the speed of light?

Then why fly dozens of light-years in a few seconds? How high is that?

First there is time and space. The singularity is simply a solution to Einstein's equation of the universe, and describing the universe does not have to be only Einstein's equation of the universe because the universe is infinite.

It is called singularity because of a flaw in existing theories of physics and cosmology, the space of the singularity is infinitely small due to a computational defect caused by mathematical infinity. In this singularity, the laws of physics are not available, and there is no concept of space-time.

In modern physics, the m theory of string theory has made parameter adjustments, introducing the minimum Planck length of the string, and also introducing the minimum Planck time, and there is no smaller scale than Planck length and time.

Frontier physics is being discussed and verified.

Summary. Hello, happy to answer your <>

The universe is not a fact, it's just a conjecture. The singularity is one of the innumerable amounts of matter in your universe; It's just that its mass is higher than that of other cosmic matter around it; The singularity ** is that the matter of the universe is in the universe **; There is no such thing as a strange lie that produces the universe! The predecessor of the singularity is also cosmic matter; It is possible to exist in the universe in different masses and in different forms.

According to current estimates, the predecessor of the singularity is likely to be a black hole.

Did the singularity exist in infinite space before the birth of the universe?

Hello, happy to answer your <>

The universe is not a fact, it's just a conjecture. The singularity is one of the innumerable amounts of matter in your universe; It's just that its mass is higher than that of other cosmic matter around it; The singularity ** is that the matter of the universe is in the universe **; There is no such thing as a strange lie that produces the universe! The predecessor of the singularity is also cosmic matter; It is possible to exist in the universe in different masses and in different forms.

According to current estimates, the predecessor of the singularity is likely to be a black hole.

The theory of the universe is a theory that most scientists agree with, and it does not mean that it is a fact, because there are also the theory of cosmic eternity, the theory of cosmic cycles, the theory of cosmic parallelism, and the theory of multidimensional cosmology. The big ** theory is just one of them. In fact, it is a bit similar to look at the superstar big **, forming a small cosmic environment around it.

Will a new universe be born after the destruction of the universe?

There are a lot of parallel universes.

If the universe is destroyed, will space and time disappear.

A new universe will be born.

It won't disappear, parallel universes still exist.

Is this whole world really virtual? Or is it real?

Real pro. Why do scientists say the world is virtual?

That's for the hype.

Get traffic. Is there a limit to speed?

You can ask me about this, I have some research.

There is no limit to speed.

Is it true that the Internet says that the speed of light proves that the world is virtual, because the speed of light is the limit supported by virtual computers?

Theoretically, yes.

No, it's the scientists themselves trying to get traffic.