Law is a combination of will and law, whether the unity of subjectivity and objectivity is correct

The first half of the sentence is incorrect. Law is inherently socially conscious.

category, is the superstructure.

And law is the category of social existence. Therefore, it is not the combination of the will and the law, but the correct reflection of the will to the law.

The unity of subjectivity and objectivity is correct.

Subjective initiative refers to people's ability and role in actively understanding and transforming the world on the basis of practice. The active understanding of the world refers to the reflection of consciousness on the objective world, which is a process of achieving the essence of things through phenomena. Objective regularity is the intrinsic, essential and stable relationship within things, and its existence and role are not subject to human subjective will.

The relationship between subjective initiative and objective regularity. Obeying objective laws is the premise for correctly giving play to subjective initiative. In order to achieve the goal of correctly understanding the world and successfully transforming the world, human activities must conform to and act in accordance with objective laws.

Otherwise, we will not be able to achieve the goal of correctly understanding the world and effectively transforming it. Giving full play to subjective initiative is a necessary condition for understanding and applying objective laws. Only by giving full play to the role of subjective initiative in practice can we correctly understand the world and successfully transform the world.

In short, respecting objective laws and giving full play to subjective initiative is a process of dialectical unity, and only by respecting objective laws can we correctly exert subjective initiative. Only by giving full play to subjective initiative can we better follow the objective law.

Legal Analysis: Marxist jurisprudence holds that law is the embodiment of the will of the people.

For the emergence and development of any legal science, the basic principle of closure supports the formation and survival of its legal form. The same is true for Marxist jurisprudence.

Marxist jurisprudence is socialist jurisprudence relative to capitalist jurisprudence, people's jurisprudence relative to ruler jurisprudence, and proletarian jurisprudence relative to bourgeois jurisprudence.

Legal basis: Article 2 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China All power in the People's Republic of China belongs to the people. The organs through which the people exercise state power are the National People's Congress and local people's congresses at all levels.

In accordance with the provisions of the law, the people manage state affairs, economic and cultural undertakings, and social affairs through various channels and forms.

Marxist jurisprudence holds that law is the embodiment of the will of the people.

For the emergence and development of any legal science, the basic principles support the formation and survival of its legal form. The same is true for Marxist jurisprudence.

Marxist jurisprudence is socialist jurisprudence relative to capitalist jurisprudence, people's jurisprudence relative to ruler jurisprudence, and proletarian jurisprudence relative to bourgeois jurisprudence.

In order to accomplish the historical task of building socialist rule of law, Marxist jurisprudence needs to sort out the legal viewpoints in human history, combine them with practice, and then form a more scientific legal concept system.

Because its basic science does not need to disguise the will of the class, and it is very different from the bourgeois view of law, the Marxist concept of law is scientific and practical, and it can fully explain the essence and function of law and its various operations. However, there has always been a voice in the academic circles that Marxist jurisprudence does not exist because there is no monograph to discuss and summarize sufficient basic principles.

This kind of exposition points to the fact that the basic principles of Marxist jurisprudence have not yet been summarized and clearly expounded. Correspondingly, the role of Marxist jurisprudence in promoting the construction of socialist rule of law is still relatively small. It can be said that clearly summarizing the basic principles is a necessary logical link for the final formation of Marxist jurisprudence.

The basic principles of Marxist jurisprudence are related to the fundamentals, basic operation, and general orientation of law. As far as Marxist jurisprudence is concerned, its basic principles reflect its own strong value orientation. Under the control of its value orientation, the general thinking about the nature, characteristics, movement and development laws of law should be able to become the general principles of law.

In addition to the general laws, the forms of legal system in capitalist society and socialist society, which are the main areas of observation of law, constitute the material for summarizing the basic principles**.

Therefore, the principles of Marxist jurisprudence should deal with the general issues of the nature, emergence and operation of law, and the basic situation in specific systems. In particular, it should be emphasized that the theoretical thinking on major legal issues in the replacement of social forms is also an important component of the basic principles of Marxist jurisprudence.

Therefore, the principles of Marxist jurisprudence should deal with the general issues of the nature, emergence and operation of law, and the basic situation in specific systems. In particular, it should be emphasized that the theoretical thinking on major legal issues in the replacement of social forms is also an important component of the basic principles of Marxist jurisprudence.

a.Law is the embodiment of the will of the ruling class.

b.The content of the law is determined by the economy.

The ruling class, in the final analysis, depends on the material conditions of life in society.