Why is it that Chinese dynasties have been difficult to break for 300 years, but Japanese and Europe

People who are a little familiar with history will find a relatively "weird" thing, that is, since Qin Shi Huang ruled the world, it has been difficult for all feudal dynasties to break the curse of 300 years, even the most famous "strong man" and "prosperous Tang" in history have not broken 300 years.

Han Feizi recorded: Yu Xia is 2,000 years old, the Xia Dynasty is 2070 BC to 1600 BC, at the age of 471, so it is estimated that the Yu Dynasty has experienced 1600 years, because there are no substantial cultural relics, this speculation only exists in the theory, and the Yu Dynasty is followed by the Xia Shang Zhou.

However, Xia Shang Zhou belongs to the slave country, can not be regarded as a feudal country, in the feudal country is the longest is the Tang Dynasty, a full 290 years, as for the "strong Han" also to divide the Eastern Han Dynasty and the Western Han Dynasty, after Wang Mang usurped the Han Dynasty, changed the name of the country to a new one, which is a new country.

Although Liu Xiu is a descendant of the Han Dynasty, but in the history books, the Eastern and Western Han Dynasty are separated, one is the Han Book and the other is the Later Han Dynasty, so it cannot be used as the same regime, the Northern and Southern Song Dynasty and the Han Dynasty are actually the same, and the last feudal dynasty Qing Dynasty is only 267 years, whether it is a "strong Han" or a "prosperous Tang Dynasty", why is it difficult to break 300 years?

Malthus, a British economist and demographer, once expressed the view that population develops with economic development, and population growth is endless, unless it is suppressed very strongly and significantly, such as natural disasters, plagues, and wars.

The population growth and land returns have presented three stages, the first stage is incremental, the second stage continues to develop steadily, the third stage is decreasing returns, and the input labor force and actual remuneration are negative.

The relative decline of the population is seventy or eighty percent, without enough population, the economy can not develop, and the war is difficult to continue, so the dynasties began to recuperate after the war stopped, a small number of people, with a large amount of land, people will be very diligent in farming.

The people's economy developed, the treasury was also enriched, and the dynasty entered its heyday, but in the heyday the population was constantly increasing, but the population increased, and everyone had less land, but the taxes and prices remained the same, and the purchasing power of the people continued to decline.

Once a natural disaster breaks out, the entire economic system will collapse, and the number of displaced people will increase, and the displaced people who have no jobs will gather and begin to revolt, whether it is Liu Bang, Wang Mang, or Li Zicheng, the peasant uprising has always occupied the era, and as soon as the war is over, the population will decrease again, and a dead cycle will begin again.

As for why Japan can be immortal? It is nothing more than a deep-rooted belief, although Japan has always been the Chrysanthemum Dynasty, but the situation in Japan is the same, but the Japanese people firmly believe that the Japanese emperor is a descendant of God, so whether the Japanese emperor is in power or reduced to slavery, it must exist, and Western Europe is more biased towards blood.

As Xunzi said: "Water can carry boats, but also can overturn boats" The longer a dynasty exists in the world, the less capital it will last.

Report feedback.

The productivity is low, and only a small number of people have money due to the heavy agriculture and suppression of business under the centralized system, but there are more places to spend money, and the taxes under various names are overwhelmed and can only resist.

Because ancient China was a feudal society, that is, the emperor was a one-man dictatorship, and in the later stages of the dynasty, basically the monarchs were mediocre, and naturally there was no way to break 300 years, but Europe was a constitutional monarchy, and the physique was different, and the results would be different;

The Japanese and European dynasties were owned by the state in terms of the land system, but the land in ancient China was in the hands of the aristocracy, so it was easy to cause peasant uprisings.

Because Japan implements the shogunate system, and the Japanese emperor only uses it as a symbol to make the final decision, and the Japanese people are very supportive of the emperor and cannot be overthrown, so the Japanese emperor system has continued until now.

Because China is vast and rich, there are many ethnic groups, and all ethnic groups want to be kings and hegemons, leaving well-being for their descendants, because whoever becomes the emperor will be beneficial to whose nation, and Japan's emperor system is actually copied from our China during the Tang Dynasty, and Japan only has a few islands, and their total area is not as large as a province in China, so they are exceptionally united, and the nationality is also very scarce, and the population is also small, so their emperor system can persist until now.

Because the emperors of Japan are not actually in power, they are generally behind the scenes, and it is the shogunate that is really in charge, so there is no such thing as organizing a rebellion to overthrow the emperor, and the Japanese people are also very supportive of the emperor, so the Japanese emperor system can persist until now.

Because the Japanese dynasty only supervised democracy and did not participate in politics.

The Japanese dynasty had a system of innovation and development, not a system of doing things for heaven with ulterior motives.

Because Japan has no history, only the emperor system!

The point is that there are too many people, right?

There is a saying: When the forest is big, there are all kinds of birds.

If there are more people, there will be characters like "Water Margin" who want to occupy the mountain as the king.

So, there is no such dynasty as it can"Hooray"The change of dynasties represents the progress of society.

The current Emperor of Japan. Not holding real power.

Ask yourself, and the answer is in your heart.

The reason why the Japanese emperor has not fallen for a thousand years and that the Chinese history has to change the dynasty in less than 300 years is because China's system is not perfect enough, and the ancient Chinese thought is relatively feudal, and the power of the Chinese emperor is too great, so there are always people who want to rebel and become emperors, so the speed of changing the dynasty is relatively fast.

Because the Japanese emperor actually did not hold real power for a long time, there was no need to seize this position; But China is completely different, so the competition is fierce.

China is a big agricultural country, before the industrial revolution, agriculture can be said to be the foundation of a country's development, the reason why China's dynasties did not appear to last for more than 300 years, the fundamental reason is the problem of the land system. And Japan and Europe have always been similar.

In Europe, they attached great importance to royal blood. Rebels must have the blood of the current emperor before they can inherit the throne. Otherwise, even if you lead a rebellion, you will have to die in the end, their power is taken from the descendants inherited from their ancestors, and of course, the dynasty will not change.

The culture is different, the change of dynasty in China is the overthrow of the upper class from the bottom, while Japan and Europe are alternately ruled by the aristocracy.

Because the systems in Japan and Europe are different, while China belongs to the feudal social system, the environment is different, and the results are different.