Is idealism good? What are the dangers of idealism?

Marxist philosophy holds that idealism is wrong.

The difference between materialism and idealism has nothing to do with whether or not it is "sensual", "faithful", or "backbone". The question of what is the origin of thinking and existence is the only criterion for distinguishing materialism from idealism. If you think that matter exists before consciousness, you are materialism, and vice versa.

In our current social environment, it is generally believed that materialism is good, idealism is bad, but absolute idealism or absolute materialism are wrong, idealism has two sides, can inspire you, can also make you ignore reality, there is no good or bad between the two, but two different philosophical views, sometimes materialism can not solve the problem, idealism can solve, and materialism is more practical.

Idealism, of course, is not good, it is wrong. We should be materialistic in our approach to the world, and material determines consciousness.

Idealism is incorrect in terms of worldview. But from the perspective of cognition, it has a positive effect, for example, idealism sees that the role of consciousness is of positive significance. But it is unreasonable to exaggerate the role of consciousness.

It's better to have dialectical materialism, and idealism won't help much.

Idealism: A philosophical school that advocates the primacy of spirit and consciousness and the secondness of matter on the basic issues of philosophy, that is, matter depends on consciousness to exist, and matter is the product of consciousness.

As we all know, there have always been many philosophical schools, but they do not go beyond two camps: the materialist camp and the idealist camp. With the development of the times, it can be said that materialism has long since gained a firm foothold even among the broad masses of the people.

However, does this mean that idealism has no market? The problem is obviously not that simple. Idealism is divided into objective idealism and subjective idealism.

With the development of science and technology and the progress of the times, objective idealism is indeed in decline, however, in stark contrast, subjective idealism shows no signs of decline. On the contrary, as the social structure becomes more complex and social life becomes more and more diverse, the subjective idealist has raised his head higher, and at the same time, he has become more able to confuse some people. There are many manifestations of subjective idealists in real life, and the following are more common:

First, generalize to the extreme, like to go to extremes. When a subjective idealist sees a leaf, he likes nothing more than to say: Ah!

There's a tree here, can't you see it? And when he saw a tree, he would say, "There's a big forest behind the tree, can't you see it?"

When he walked to the edge of the forest and saw a bush, he would squat in the bush and say, "Why is this forest full of shrubs?" It's boring!

Second, chasing the wind and catching shadows, imagining. If the subjective idealist sees a drop of dew on a blade of grass in the morning, he likes to say that it must have rained last night; If at noon he sees the grass growing in the direction of the sun, he likes to say that it must be the result of the wind; And at dusk, if he sees a student sitting on a stone bench reading from a distance, he will definitely say: Ah, the current students are under too much pressure, and they don't even play, they are all stupid!

But, dear sir, you don't go and read what books the students read? 3. Self-absorption, nagging. Subjective idealists tend to think that they know everything and always feel that others are lagging behind them.

What's even more harmful is that in order to lead the fashion, and it is not excluded that he contributes to the inheritance of civilization, he also constantly creates "theories" and opinions. In order to systematize his "theory" as much as possible, he did not hesitate to repeat his views repeatedly; And in order to make the argument more convincing, a few "typical" examples are cited from time to time. But, sir, can those one-sided, catch-after examples be played casually?

Subjective idealists constantly create one-sided "theories" and viewpoints, and the harm is very great. There are at least two ways to choose the most important: first, a needless waste of life; Second, it is not conducive to the advancement of the building of spiritual civilization.

Personally, I think that subjectively speaking, materialism is more realistic, for example, a loved one is sick, needs a lot of money, and can sustain life for a period of time, maybe 10day, 15days, it may also be 1 year or two years, assuming it will be spent, or it may be 10,000, 500,000 ......But in the end, it didn't cure ......Idealism will think that spending is worth money because it can be earned because the money is gone, and people can't come back when they are gone, materialism will not spend, and she will think that she can't cure it no matter what, and keep the money for a child, or ...... end up emptyThere is no good or bad in this matter, right and wrong, the two sides of the matter often appear, when there are advantages and disadvantages of one thing, it will reflect the character of different people, assuming that it is still an idealism and a materialism two individuals, or meet relatives who are sick, why there are differences, it is because ......of the limited conditions, this money, there is no life, there is no life, if there is no treatment at all, then it will not be cured, because you can't borrow if you want to cure it, you can't borrow it, you can't borrow it, you can't borrow it, you can't borrow itThe ...... of unification of opinions can only be waivedThe other is that there is a lot of money for treatment, even if it is a dime, then there is no need to think about ......Why do the two people have different personalities, it is an idealism and a materialism, and there is no right or wrong in some things, but the ideas are different ......The two personalities of the two subjects can complement each other, but they must be discussed ......Both sides have a ...... to understand each otherIf you can't get through ...... for a dayIdealism is looking for idealism, hahaha divorce doesn't care about family property, he cares if there is a other party in his heart, materialism will think about separation......I can't give him anything more ......Idealistic people will also think that he is willing to give me the family property, and there is still me in my heart, and it is easy to break the thread if I am undecided, which is not a sober ......Materialism will want to separate the family, and when they don't let me do anything, I will be separated like this, right......Personally, I am a materialistic ......It's ...... to be uncertain and have such a characterThe idealistic side is human, and he doesn't care about gains and losses, but he will also think materialistically and rationally about whether he has suffered losses or ......notFor example, when I take a taxi with a friend, I may always choose to be the co-pilot and ask the hungry driver to pay for the position......Some people will always avoid this position ......If you keep meeting him, he always doesn't pay, I idealistically say that I'm not happy, because he is the one who takes advantage of him, but I'm embarrassed to let him buy or whatever, the materialistic idea is that you can't make deep friends or don't pay, or even avoid riding in the car together......This has not been bought is materialism, he can aa.

You can also ask him to be fair with you for one time, but you have to keep asking him to buy ...... that is impossible for him to loseThat's how ......That's all ...... to sayThere are also three examples of the above, ......Personal understanding is not authoritative ......Let's deal with it......The last sentence has to be objectively thought about by the supervisor, that is, now the other party wants to be good for himself, some people envy the freedom of being single, and some people envy the family reunion ......Subjective mutual envy, objective you really change back is not suitable for yourself, single you have to solve the problem of food and clothing by yourself, can you have the economy? If you have a family, you have to think about taking care of the family, there will be conflicts, there will be conflicts, and you will be responsible for hail, are you prepared for this? Think holistically and choose your favorite ......There will be fewer ...... detoursGoodbye