Is idealism wrong, is idealism really wrong

Landlord, we have to have our own thoughts, there is no absolute right and wrong in this world, philosophy is the foundation of human thought.

Personally, I admire Wang Yangming, only when you see the flowers bloom, the flowers bloom, don't they? Otherwise, even if thousands of flowers bloom, what does it have to do with you?

Only idealists can live a chic and comfortable life! Happy to you!

I think. Idealistic people have a self-soothing function.

Whether it's idealism or materialism, the key is to see how we look at it As long as we have good thoughts and idealistic materialism, what's the difference?

Whether idealism has nothing to do with whether or not to live is fundamentally two concepts. ⌒

I think that if you have a theory, you have to prove it with evidence, otherwise it is just hypothetical speculation.

Generally speaking, philosophical "isms" are divided into materialism and idealism. The laws of physics can only explain one aspect of the world, and the same is true of philosophical isms. Dialectical materialism and historical materialism, like other materialisms, subjective idealism, and objective idealism, cannot explain the world alone and completely.

Some doctrines that claim to be true are in fact personal beliefs, such as Newton's classical mechanics, and certain laws of physics have been thought by some to explain the world perfectly. Physics aims for the "grand unified theory", and so should philosophy.

Committing the mistake of idealism" is undoubtedly a materialist prejudice, and in the face of the vast and mysterious universe, it is unwise for people to easily make a right or wrong judgment on the positive and negative sides of certain issues. Wise people will say, "Both sides have scope and limitations, and truth should be the unity of the two."

Everything is divided into two, and the problem is seen with a critical eye.

It's not a question of right or wrong.

Personally, I believe that there is no right or wrong between idealism and materialism (and the current philosophical community is no longer based on the ontology of matter or consciousness in the original world, nor on the epistemology of whether human beings are capable of understanding the world, but on the philosophy of linguistics), or Marx's practical materialism. You say it's wrong because your evaluation criteria think it's wrong. Idealism is wrong because it is the antithesis of materialism.

Materialism can also be wrong, because idealists think so. Therefore, there is no right or wrong in philosophy. Right and wrong are human value orientations, something other than philosophy.

It's hard to say, the point of view should be comprehensive.

Idealism has some reference significance for materialism.

It can be said that without idealism there is no materialism.

Idealism is not wrong. Whether it is idealism or materialism, if you fall into pure theory, there is no point in arguing for half a day.

That is to say, in the minds of orthodox "idealists", not to mention that matter is not primary, even "consciousness" is not primary, and "matter and consciousness" are both derivatives of "a priori premise". As for what the "a priori premise" is, it is agnostic. This is the original meaning of "idealism", so it is "nonsense" to say that the dispute over "first nature" is "nonsense".

Absolute idealism.

Absolute idealism contains all the common characteristics of idealism, and Hegel elaborated on the "Absolute Idea" at the end of his Logic, but its original text is very complex and difficult to understand, even the philosophers Walles and Russell are difficult to explain.

In pursuing the original elements of the world, "absolute idealism" falls into the same view as "objective idealism", except that absolute idealism denies that "gods are entities". Aristotle's "God" and Islamic Sufism fall into this category.

Absolute idealism belongs to polytheism, and its essence is to pursue understanding, etc., that is, the root of all things, the nature that everyone has, which is the result of practice and hard work, and cannot be obtained by delusion, and people who are based on delusion and who see what they see as the truth will never discover the meaning of the essence until the concept of idealism and become a solipsist.

The scope is different. In the context of Marxist philosophy, it is certainly wrong. But in the context of Western philosophy, it is meaningful and right.

Idealism is not all wrong. It should be said that "idealism" is more accurately translated than "idealism". Nowadays, the academic circles call Plato's "eidos" (forms) of the above figures "rational theory" to distinguish the ideas of the theory of ideas; Plato's rational type is not empirical (a priori), so "rational type" is a more appropriate translation.

Philosophy can be divided into two major schools, idealism is one of the two basic schools of philosophy, it is a theoretical system that is opposed to materialism. Idealism is a philosophical school that advocates that ideas are the first nature of the world and matter is the second nature of the world, that is, matter depends on consciousness for its existence, and matter is the product of consciousness.

Plato (427-347 BC, founder of the academic school, teacher of Aristotle. Plato, the founder of Western objective idealism, believed that the world consisted of a "world of ideas" and a "world of phenomena." The world of ideas is real and eternal, and the real world that human senses come into contact with is only a faint shadow of the world of ideas, which is composed of phenomena, and each phenomenon is characterized by temporary changes due to factors such as time and space.

The main mistake of idealism: denying the decisive role of matter on consciousness.

Materialism believes that matter is primordial, consciousness is derived, there is matter first and then consciousness, and matter determines consciousness. Idealism holds that consciousness is primordial, that matter depends on consciousness, and that it is not matter that determines consciousness, but consciousness that determines matter.

Idealism is one of the two basic schools of philosophy, which advocates that ideas are the first nature of the world and matter is the second nature of the world. Idealism is divided into objective idealism and subjective idealism.

Subjective idealism regards a certain subjective spirit of an individual, such as feelings, experiences, minds, consciousness, concepts, wills, subconscious, souls, spirits, etc., as the root and basis of the emergence and existence of all things in the conscious world, and everything in the external world is derived from these subjective spirits, which is the manifestation of these subjective spirits.

Therefore, in the view of the subjective idealist, the subjective spirit is the origin and primary, while the things of the external world are derived and secondary. It should be noted that the subjective consciousness of the subjective idealist refers to the sum of the immaterial in nature, not simply the human mind.

Objective idealism holds that the objective spiritual or conceptual world is an ontology that precedes and exists independently of the material world, and that the material world (or external world) is nothing but the externalization or manifestation of this objective spirit or principle, the former being primordial and primary, and the latter derivative, secondary.

No. 1. I think, therefore I am, and this world exists because of you.

2. Even if this world does not exist without you, this world still exists.