Why are there some jurisdictions where fathers and sons are not allowed to sit at the table? What s

In some places there is a rule that a father and son cannot sit at the table. The reason for this rule is mainly related to an old saying in the countryside, and it also shows that fathers and sons cannot sit at the same table when they eat together. In fact, this also reflects the importance that Chinese attach to this kind of seating.

If you have eaten a banquet in the countryside, you will find that there is such a phenomenon. Some children are not allowed to sit until the meal is served, otherwise it is disrespectful. At the same time, some of the more important positions will be given to the respected and older people in the village, and these positions have been arranged in advance.

The father and the son are two different generations, and if the generation is not enough, the son does not have this qualification. If there is such a rule in your place, you must learn to follow it. Because of the local customs, this kind of regulation has basically disappeared, which also reflects the fact that everyone's perception is changing.

In the past, when eating, you would often see square tables. However, one of the major drawbacks of this kind of table is that there are very few people who can sit at a table, so nowadays everyone basically switches to round tables. And the round table does not have the kind of rules that everyone says, which is a very common way of hospitality, and this way has a positive side and a negative side, and everyone must learn to look at it objectively.

And this concept has been implanted in everyone's minds, and it is extremely difficult to change it. <>

In addition to this regulation, in ancient times, it was also found that women were not allowed to eat at the table. Now everyone's thinking is progressing and changing, and if you mention this behavior again, you will only be spurned by everyone. Sometimes the child is relatively young, and the father has no way to take care of his child all the time.

And the father would often sit with some people of the same age, and the son would not be able to interject when he sat next to him.

It's just that some places are too conservative, saying that fathers and sons are different in generation and can't sit at the same table to eat, I think that now they are all civilized societies under the rule of law, and this phenomenon should be eliminated.

Because the customs are exactly the same in each region, there are such regulations. I think this kind of statement is very superstitious, and such a statement is also a kind of feudalism, and this custom should be abolished as soon as possible.

Father and son are two different backups, and if the generation is not enough, the son is not qualified to sit and eat with the father, which shows that everyone must learn to abide by it and follow the local customs.