Contemporary primary schools advocate staying in school at noon and lying on the table for lunch bre

<> lunch break has always been an important rest measure for students, to a certain extent, through lunch break, not only can help children to relieve brain fatigue, but also can better conserve energy to continue to study in the afternoon, so as to improve their learning efficiency, so lunch break is relatively important for both primary and high school students. And there are news reports that contemporary primary schools advocate staying in school at noon and lying on the table for lunch breaks, so many netizens asked: What do you think?

I don't agree with this suggestion, it not only seriously harms the student's body to a certain extent, but also can easily lead to a decline in the child's academic performance. Especially for primary school students, I think we have enough time to give them plenty of rest, and we should not choose to let children stay in school and study on their stomachs at their desks, which will bring more learning pressure to children. Not only do children not get enough rest, but it may harm the child's physical health, especially for primary school students, they are often still in the important stage of growing the body, and this operation in the school is likely to lead to the child's excessive use of the spine, which affects the child's healthy development, thus bringing more serious cervical spine pain to the child.

For us adults, it is extremely uncomfortable to sleep on the table, let alone children, so for them to take a lunch break in this way, then they are basically in a state of not getting a good rest, so it is easy to get sleepy in class, which leads to their inability to concentrate on listening to the teacher's lessons in class, and may even be criticized by the teacher. Therefore, to a certain extent, it may also hurt the child's own self-esteem, which will lead to a series of bad events.

So I think we should still give our children some extra time to rest, after all, children are in elementary school, and there is no need to bear such heavy learning pressure, right?

This kind of advocacy is not good, if primary school students only rest for a while at noon, their bodies are very tired, and the state in the afternoon is not particularly good, and there is no way to learn something better.

Personally, I think this is not good, because the quality of sleep is not good when lying on the table for a morning break, and it is very damaging to the cervical spine and neck of elementary school students.

I think this kind of lunch break is unhealthy for the child, it may cause the child's arm to be paralyzed, and it may also cause the child's body to be affected accordingly.

Contemporary primary schools advocate staying at school at noon and taking a morning break, because this allows students to have enough energy to cope with their afternoon studies. In some elementary schools, students go home for lunch and come and go for a long time, and they may watch TV at home after eating, so the children's energy in the afternoon will be very poor. Therefore, it is normal for primary school students to stay in school for lunch break, and this form can also help students save a lot of time.

Some students don't like to sleep at noon, so they may behave riskily outside of school, which is difficult for schools and parents to guard against. Therefore, it is better to put all the students in the school and let the students have a lunch break, in which case someone will take care of the lunch break of these students. Then students can be more conscious during the lunch break, which means that in this case, the students' rest time can be guaranteed, and the students' energy in the afternoon can also be guaranteed.

Although elementary school students are very lively, it does not mean that their energy is unlimited, if they are allowed to use up all their energy at noon, then they are likely to fall asleep in the middle of the class in the afternoon, and this way of learning is completely inappropriate. Therefore, it is very wise for students to take a part of their lunch break at noon, and this choice is very helpful for students' learning.

Therefore, as a parent, you should also know how to support the school's decision, to let your child receive a better education in school, and if the child is in school, then the child will not have time to go out and do bad things, so it is a very good choice to let the student receive lunch break discipline in school. And it's a great help for students, and it's safe and secure. Therefore, the school can discuss with the parents appropriately and then make such a decision.

At present, the management of primary school students needs to be improved to a certain extent, and resting on the table during lunch break is not conducive to the development of students. It is likely to injure the spine and cervical spine, and gymnastics is not recommended.

At noon, the children have a limited amount of rest, but at the same time, they need a lunch break, so they can only rest on their stomachs on the table.

This is because it saves students time, so they don't need to go back and forth between home and school, and use the saved time to study.

Because today's society is very volatile, I hope that students will have more time to study.

I think there are pros and cons to this kind of regulation, but the advantages generally outweigh the disadvantages. The school does not let children move around in order to protect children's safety, so that children can better participate in learning, and do not let children be distracted from useless things other than studying. However, in a small way, such restraint will also make the child's physical condition worse and worse, and lack some of the exercise required for outdoor activities.

Many primary and secondary schools today do have mandatory regulations that students are not allowed to go out of the classroom except for going to the toilet during recess and lunch breaks, and this system has been around for a long time. From the starting point of the school, the school believes that students should learn, and things other than learning are meaningless, except for the normal physiological behavior of people, students should devote themselves to learning, which is the true meaning of the school. From the teacher's point of view, it is also good for the stability of the staff during class time that students do not run around.

To be honest, children at this age are indeed more lively and playful, but it is very unfortunate that children at this age have the heaviest learning tasks. Parents send their children to school so that students can learn in a good atmosphere. And it is understandable for children to go to the toilet during class time, and other chasing and slapping activities are useless and do not help with learning at all.

And then there's the fact that when these students get a little older, they run very fast and don't know how to play and play. If a student accidentally injures another classmate in the process of fighting, or accidentally falls down while fighting in the stairwell, the school will definitely bear some responsibility. Therefore, the school has made such a regulation to reduce the occurrence of accidents and ensure the safety of students, so this is an advantageous point.

But the only downside of this rule is that students have little time for outdoor exercise after students are banned from activities during recess and lunch breaks. In the long run, these students will generally be in poor health and will have weaker physical fitness, which is not conducive to comprehensive development. <>

So, I think there are pros and cons to this regulation, but there are more advantages.

I don't think there should be such a rule, between classes and lunch breaks, students should be free to relax, if they stay in the classroom all day and do not let students move, it is not good for students' physical and mental health.

No, because recess and lunch break are students' rest time, and without sufficient relaxation, they cannot devote themselves to learning.

The rules of elementary and middle schools prohibit students from leaving the classroom during recess and lunch breaks, and I think this behavior violates students' right to free movement, and it is easy to train students to become nerds, thus inhibiting their nature. I think the relevant schools should revoke this rule, so that children can live innocently and happily, and they should not only study at a young age.

Here's how I see it. This is definitely not right, it is equivalent to squeezing students' free time and leaving students without free activities.

I don't think it's necessary, you should be free to move around during breaks, and if you stay in the classroom all the time, the learning effect is not good.

In my opinion, this provision is very unreasonable. Primary and secondary school students love to move and play, and the mandatory regulations do not allow students to go out of the classroom, which simply stifles the students' active nature, which is to facilitate the management of the school. It's ridiculous.

This kind of regulation is completely an act of house arrest, and if the classrooms are not vacated, then why should the school build other facilities, isn't it a waste?

This rule is contrary to nature and can be counterproductive. How do you feel in the house for a day, children are already very tired from studying, and not letting them relax and let them stay in the house will only have the opposite effect.

Irrationality. If a student wants to go to the toilet, he or she has to hold it back, and I don't think it's reasonable.

I think this regulation is too unreasonable, and students don't even have basic personal freedom.

I think it's a good adjustment because it allows elementary school students to get a good night's sleep and make them healthier.

I think it's a great idea, after all, students are also very tired from studying, and they should have a good rest.

I think it's good, after all, the lunch break allows students to study better, so it's good to sleep a little longer.

This is done in the right way to give the kids a good lunch break, and it can also give the kids a good lunch break.

This is for the good of the students, because summer is already coming, and the children's lunch break should be increased so that the children can get enough rest.

I very much agree with this behavior of the school, so I think it is worth promoting and arranging lunch breaks for students and teachers within the school's capabilities. Students and teachers can rest their tired bodies and minds. It will also be of great help to the class.

As we all know, children are very hard in the school period, they have to get up at 7 o'clock or even 6 o'clock in the morning to go to school, and they have to go to class at 12 o'clock at noon and lunch at 2 o'clock, and it takes up to 8-10 hours a day to go to school alone, and they have to write homework after returning home, well, some students may write until 11 or 2 o'clock in the evening before resting. In this way, students go to bed at 11 p.m. every night and wake up at 6 a.m. on the second day, although the sleep time can be guaranteed for 7 to 8 hours, but the children are still in a developmental stage, and they also need to use a lot of brain cells to attend classes every day. At this time, it will be counterproductive for the child to not get enough rest.

I believe that everyone has more or less dozed off in class when they were students, and they all know that taking a nap and distracting will lead to inattention and miss the key points of the teacher, so as to fall behind the class, and the rest of the class will be in a fog.

When I was a student, there were 8 classes a day, and each lesson had a focus. Chinese, mathematics, English, etc., each lesson is new knowledge, a new world that students have never been exposed to, so each lesson needs to be attentive to listen and think. However, if students don't get enough sleep, they won't be able to devote themselves to their studies.

Therefore, the school does its best to provide convenience for students and teachers to the greatest extent possible, to ensure that students and teachers have enough sleep, and to listen carefully during class. Therefore, I think that the school's opening of lunch break beds for primary school students is very worthy of promotion. Elementary school students have poor self-control ability, although there is a lunch break at noon, but some students do not sleep at all when they go home, and some students cannot go home because of family education, so it is necessary for the school to open a lunch break bed.

I think it should be promoted, because primary school students are an important stage of physical development, and if they have a bad sleeping position, it will affect their physical development in the future.

The school arranges lunch break beds for students, which is definitely worth promoting, which can not only avoid the trouble of parents picking up and dropping off, but also allow students to have a better rest and improve children's learning efficiency.

It can be promoted, because primary school students are still in the time to grow their bodies, and some children are far away from home and can't go home at noon, so they can only sleep on the table, which will cause damage to the spine, so the lunch break bed is very convenient.

Personally, I think this kind of behavior in school is worth promoting, because primary school students are in the time of growing their bodies, and after a morning of studying, their bodies will be very tired, and only when they are rested will they have plenty of energy to study in the afternoon.

Of course, it is very worthwhile, this arrangement is particularly good, there is no need for students to lie on the table to rest, and they can have a better sleep.

Worth. In this way, students can take a lunch break directly at school, which is not only convenient for parents, but also convenient for the school to manage in a unified manner, killing two birds with one stone.

Of course yes, but this needs to take into account the economic conditions of various places, and cannot be blindly promoted without considering the family conditions of students.