To what extent can a teacher work to teach students well? Netizen The picture is too beautiful to

Because teachers of different subjects will use their body posture to teach knowledge to students, they will feel that such teachers are really attentive and fulfill the responsibility of imparting knowledge.

Teachers can supervise students' reading and homework without breaks or meals, and provide continuous tutoring to students who have learning difficulties to help them understand and master knowledge.

Because the teacher can't wait to give you all the things he has learned. They tend to be very selfless when teaching, and occasionally have strange postures.

Learning is for the sake of reasoning, learning is for the sake of reasoning, and learning is for the sake of reasoning. In school, mastering the learning method is far more important than grades, which are only a reflection of the amount of knowledge you have acquired. Students should take the initiative to receive education, and students who choose not to get good grades do not understand the meaning of learning (except for those who control scores), and teachers should give educational guidance.

The law stipulates that students have the obligation to study hard and complete the corresponding learning tasks. Why some subjects have high scores and some low scores, language, mathematics and English are the foundation of the foundation, and only after learning well can you better learn other subjects, and the different credits of other subjects are to balance the difficulty of learning, so don't think that you can give up directly if the score is not high. If you don't have the previous foundation, how to learn, isn't it more difficult, and the difficulty of learning subjects with low scores is naturally lower, and there is no harm in taking some time to learn.

Finally, it is the duty of the teacher to teach students knowledge, and it is not excluded that some teachers are just for performance, but it is more important for teachers to teach students to be a person than to teach students knowledge, which requires cooperation with students' parents to obtain performance while educating students. One more to add, you said that going against the will of the students is not for the good of the students, I can only say that you are naïve, primary and secondary school students are still in the stage of growth and development, the world view is slowly forming, if you make mistakes and do not correct them in time, students are easy to go astray, this cannot be regarded as going against the wishes of students, unless you don't want to be good, then don't blame others for treating you badly.

You can think about it the other way, if one day the teacher no longer forces you to study, then the teacher is nothing more than being criticized by the leader, or deducting some salary, but it is different for you, what you lose is the youth that inspires people to make progress, and it is your future. You can say that you just don't want to learn for a while, it doesn't mean that you will continue to sink all the time, but is your self-discipline really that strong, but you don't know that even if the teacher is urging you to learn passively behind your back, there will be a lot of people who fall behind, so how well do you know yourself. Besides, it's not a good thing to be partial to the subject after all, you may not want to study certain subjects, but the teacher's original intention to let you develop holistically is always good.

So, don't always think about things in opposition to the teacher now, you should think from the perspective of the teacher. Finally, I wish you progress!

From a practical point of view, teachers let students learn for the sake of achieving work results, not for the sake of students' good, and there is some truth in this statement, because teachers show their ability to work because of the achievements of their classmates, but teachers teach you also for the growth of students, and they are complementary.

The subject is a little confused, and the good students are the teacher's work results! It is the teacher's task to make students have good grades and good moral character, and it is the achievement to do a good job.

Isn't sending a child to school just to let the teacher follow up on the student's learning progress? Otherwise, what's the point of having teachers, especially those subjects with few points you mentioned, which also require money, doesn't it??? The student's grades and the teacher's work are just a mutual fulfillment!!