If humans were solitary animals, would they be able to develop into human civilization?

Zhihu also has this problem, but it's very unauthentic. Assuming that man evolves into a solitary animal, it will certainly not be as weak as modern man, it is not a problem to kill a mammoth with a punch, zero degrees is not cold, and you can live without modern tools, because it is difficult to live alone.

Well, seriously, as long as the territorial and free instincts are weak, it is not that solitary animals cannot cooperate in industry, but also in the literal culture and law towns, and you can also train cats and hamsters. First of all, solitary animals do not have the emotion of loneliness. Secondly, the envy of dignity in solitary animals is weak.

Again, solitary animals do not have a herd mentality, the crowd is invalid, the pillow wind is invalid, the propaganda and guidance are ineffective, and the decision will not be influenced by other people's words, and there will be no heart, but the curiosity is not necessarily weak. Moreover, solitary animals do not discriminate racially, not by geography, but at most by the way you talk and behave. Because these have social elements in them, it sounds wonderful, right, is it a kind of successful person's style, it can be said that solitary animals are born to be the material of superiors.

Solitary animals, on the other hand, are not grateful for being favored and do not feel guilty for revenge. Finally, with the exception of a brief period of childbearing and early childhood, solitary animals are not bound by affection. This is very important, why cronyism, because most human beings are limited by family affection, your henchmen and rebels will be in the interests of the subordinates, and your son's rebel subordinates will rebel against this little beast first, so trusting relatives is far safer than trusting strangers.

So if solitary animals build urban life together, it is conceivable that it is really the capable who are in power, there is no value of father's inheritance, the old and the weak are abandoned, and the hard work does not exist. Cold, indifferent, and productive and efficient, because human exploitation of human beings will definitely be rebelled, and can only exploit some animals with weak self-consciousness and free instincts, and human beings are born nobles, and must have gone through the path of colonization, conquest and enslavement.

Mine is no!

Animals on the earth are divided into two categories: social and solitary, and only those who live in groups have hierarchy, division of labor, cooperation, and exchange.

The most significant of the social animals are ants and bees.

People live in groups, and human brains are the most developed, and human civilization has developed!

Rats are one of the animals that are most likely to develop civilization because rats are intelligent animals, so if there were no humans, then rats would probably develop into civilization.

I think monkeys are most likely to develop civilization because monkeys are very intelligent and have a lively personality and are also very good at thinking.

It is quite possible that it is a monkey, because monkeys are indeed very intelligent animals, and now they have the IQ of a child.

Individual species will build human civilization because they are intelligent.

Give it a try! Suppose humans are solitary animals from the beginning. Then there should be no birth of society and civilization.

People don't have the concept of a dad. There will also be no concept of a marital society. The prerequisite for civilization is that the population density is high enough to communicate with each other.

It should not be civilized when you live alone. There should be language. But there will be absolutely no words.

It was concluded that if humans were able to evolve, it should also be at the stage of cave people.

And then down. Suppose that human beings have come out of the scumbag. I mean, exactly like people now.

Stand on the 100,000-year-old savannah of East Africa. They are solitary animals. Then it is still possible for them to chase the little antelope in one breath when the sun is at its maximum.

This is the greatest advantage of human evolution. But mammoth, forget it or something! That thing shouldn't be able to kill one person!

So the conclusion is two. Americas, Australia, etc. Megafauna may not have become extinct.

The end result is. Humans may live like orangutans. They prey, small animals that are blind and envious.

Of course, also eat fruits, tubers, etc. There will be no religion for these. There will also be no war countries.

In short, there is one more ape in the world.

Question that came to mind suddenly. with human physiology. Can a woman who lives alone raise a large child?

With such a low fertility rate, coupled with such a high mortality rate, is it really okay for human beings? Imagine a woman with a 3-year-old, two-year-old and one-year-old child chasing an antelope in the savannah of East Africa. Again, there is another problem.

However, if you are a woman, you should be able to erect a high flagpole. But the best thing is that you don't have to buy a house!

Patients with hair loss can be treated with supplementation of some foods rich in vitamin A, vitamin B, vitamin C, and some foods rich in trace elements copper, iron, and zinc, such as carrots, spinach, animal liver, and fish.

If man were a solitary animal, then human life would not be so rich.

What if humans were solitary animals? Human beings are solitary animals, and the human beings in the world will slowly disappear. There will be very few human beings.

Then there will be no next generation.

Solitary animals, we are familiar with: tigers, mink, snakes, bears, eagles and so on. Solitary animals generally have one thing in common: they are very fierce and fierce, they don't need to live in groups for self-defense or predation, and they don't have the ability to survive and sense of territory.

<> "There used to be many strange animals in nature, and they seem to humans today to be the product of failed experiments. Take this huge animal, for example.

This animal is called shovel-toothed elephants, and fossils suggest that they lived between 15 million and 4 million years ago. This animal is really strangely long, first of all, from the trunk and limbs, it looks like a huge elephant, but the lower jaw of this animal protrudes forward, more than 2 meters long, and there are two large teeth in the lower jaw.

Therefore, scientists estimate that this animal relies on two large teeth to shovel up the aquatic plants on the ground and send them to the mouth. This explanation is quite in place. Because, if they don't have a long mouth and don't have big teeth, they can't eat happily.

The shovel-toothed elephant used to be a very common animal on Earth. Their fossils have been found in Asia, Europe, Africa, and North America. This shows that more than 10 million years ago, this way of eating with a shovel was still very suitable for the environment at that time.

However, about 4 million years ago, these animals disappeared, and they were not fortunate enough to participate in the development of human civilization. In fact, if these shovel-toothed elephants can continue to reproduce, I think they will probably be domesticated by humans and become good assistants in building human civilization like Asian elephants.

It is estimated that the shovel-toothed elephant is about a meter tall and weighs about a ton. Such a huge animal, they can shovel things with their jaws much faster than humans can with shovels.

Imagine that when building a house, the shovel-toothed elephant only needs to stand in front of the house and shovel the stone with its jaw, and then easily put the stone on the roof with its tall body, which is much faster than using manpower.

In addition to shoveling things, shovel-toothed incisors have many uses. For example, they can use their front teeth to peel off the bark of trees. So, humans can use this feature to get shovel-toothed elephants to help peel the bark of trees.

The incisors of the shovel-toothed elephant can also function as a sickle when combined with the long beak. With shovel-toothed elephants, the speed of getting to the state and cutting wood in the wild can be greatly increased!

It can be seen that if shovel-toothed elephants survive to the time of human civilization, they will be much more useful than Asian elephants.