-
If it is the responsibility of the battery car, then it is his responsibility to hit the second car, and if it is your responsibility, it is also your responsibility to hit the second car.
-
The car crashed into the battery carThe battery car crashed into another car, who is responsible? In my opinion, it should be the responsibility of the car, because it was the car that hit the battery car that caused the battery car to hit another car, so it is the responsibility of the car.
-
Look who's breaking the traffic laws.
If the vehicle involved in the accident violated the law, then it is the responsibility of the vehicle that caused the accident.
Electric vehicles are not responsible if they do not violate traffic laws.
But if the electric car violates the law, it must also be held responsible.
-
The car hit the battery car, and the battery car hit another car, and the responsibility must be the car. The first car is fully responsible for the accident, and the battery car and the other car that was hit are not responsible for the accident.
-
If there is no traffic violation between the battery car and the other car, then the first car responsible for the traffic accident should be fully responsible. There is no such thing as a battery car having any secondary responsibility!
-
The traffic management department of the public security organ shall, according to the behavior of the parties, the role played in the occurrence of road traffic accidents and the severity of the fault, determine the responsibility of the parties.
1. If a road traffic accident is caused by the fault of one party, it shall bear full responsibility, and if a road traffic accident occurs due to the fault of two or more parties, it shall bear primary responsibility, equal liability and secondary liability respectively according to its behavior, the role of the accident and the severity of the fault.
-
The car hits the battery car, and the battery car hits another car, generally speaking, as long as the battery car driver has no traffic violations, then there is no doubt that the car driver is still responsible.
-
The car hit the battery car, and the battery car hit another car, and the responsibility is the traffic accident caused by the car in an accident, so the first car bears full responsibility for the accident.
-
If the car hits a battery car, the car is fully responsible, and the battery car hits another car, the first car is responsible for this, because it was he who hit the electric car, causing the electric car to hit another car.
-
In this case, it is up to the accident to determine the primary and secondary responsibility, and for this kind of serial collision accident, most of the rear rear-end vehicles are fully responsible.
-
This mainly depends on the identification of the traffic police department, and I think this is mainly the responsibility of the car, because the car first hit the battery car, and then caused the battery car to hit another car.
-
Generally speaking, it is the last responsibility, but there are exceptions, which are determined by the traffic police on-site investigation.
-
There is no need to think about this and no need to argue about anything, if it is not the car that caused the accident and hit the battery car, then the battery car will not hit other cars, and the car that caused the accident is responsible.
-
It should be judged according to the actual traffic situation at that time, and in the case of no fault, the car is fully responsible, and the electric vehicle is secondarily responsible.
-
Someone else must have been in the first part of the car, because under his creation, the electric car could not control the first part of the car, so the main responsibility was on the first car.
-
First of all, it depends on whose responsibility the car hits the battery car, if it is the responsibility of the car, and it hits another car, it is also the responsibility of the car.
-
It is the responsibility of the car brother, because the car crashed into the battery car first, so that the battery car crashed into another car.
-
The car hit the battery car, and the battery car hit another car, it should have started to crash, and the car is fully responsible.
-
It is the responsibility of the car, and all the liability caused by you hitting someone else's car requires the car to bear the liability for compensation.
-
This situation is a joint and several liability accident, and the traffic police need to issue an accident responsibility letter to divide the responsibility!
-
The car hit the battery carThe battery car hit another car, who is responsible?
Liability of the first car.
-
Then one responsibility to one responsibility will not be in a situation where responsibility is connected.
-
If it is the responsibility of the car according to the traffic law, the key depends on which car is in violation.
-
Of course, you are fully responsible, you pay for the battery car and then pay for another car.
-
The description is too simplistic to determine responsibility.
-
The first car is fully responsible.
-
In the event of a traffic accident between motor vehicles, the party at fault shall bear the liability for compensation for the traffic accident, and if both parties are at fault, the responsibility shall be shared according to the proportion of their respective faults: if they are primarily responsible, they shall bear 70%, if they are equally responsible, they shall bear 50%, and if they are secondarily responsible, they shall bear 30%.
Let's see who bumps into it first.
If the other party bumps into you.
And you don't have any traffic violations.
A large part of it is the responsibility of the other party to hit first.
Hello question, my son works in the factory, and when he gets off work, the battery car behind hits my son, and the person who hit my son fell and broke his bones, who is responsible?
On the factory road, there was no violation of road traffic safety, they were all going in one direction, and the person hit my son from behind and fell down.
Count it as the one who hit your son.
Did she bump into your son first?
Ask the question: Yes. In the same direction after work, the man crashed into my son's battery car from behind.
His responsibility. Question: I have already sent that person to the hospital last night, and I have hospitalized him, and the factory has promised that it is a work-related injury, can I ignore him?
Injuries make them compensate us.
Obviously, he bumped into us.
If we don't hit us, we won't get hurt.
Question: We weren't hurt, the man was hurt.
Oh, that's fine.
We didn't get hurt.
It's okay, don't worry about it.
He has already been taken to the hospital.
But working in a factory.
If you want to visit, you can visit some.
-
Legal analysis: non-motor vehicle and motor vehicle collision, should be based on who violated traffic rules, the role of the accident and the severity of the fault to specifically determine, if the electric vehicle violates traffic rules and crashed into a normal motor vehicle, the electric vehicle should be fully responsible for the accident, if it is due to the motor vehicle when the electric vehicle hit, then the motor vehicle bears full responsibility for the accident.
Legal basis: According to the Regulations on Procedures for Handling Road Traffic Accidents
Article 60 The traffic management department of the public security organs shall, according to the role of the party's conduct in the occurrence of road traffic accidents and the severity of the fault and error, determine the responsibility of the party. (1) Where a road traffic accident is caused by the fault of one of the parties, full responsibility shall be borne by the party; (2) Where a road traffic accident occurs due to the fault of two or more parties, they shall bear primary responsibility, equal responsibility and secondary responsibility respectively according to the effect of their actions on the accident and the severity of the fault; (3) None of the parties is at fault for causing the road traffic accident, and none of the parties is liable if the accident is caused by the traffic accident. If one party intentionally causes a road traffic accident, the other party is not liable.
-
Hello, thank you for your patience, if there is a traffic accident between a motor vehicle and an electric vehicle, and the electric vehicle is not at fault, the motor vehicle shall be liable for compensation; If there is evidence to prove that the electric vehicle is at fault, the liability of the motor vehicle party shall be appropriately reduced according to the degree of fault; If the motor vehicle party is not at fault, it shall bear no more than 10% of the liability for compensation. The loss of the front liquid in the traffic accident is caused by the intentional collision of the electric vehicle with the motor vehicle, and the motor vehicle party is not liable for compensation. Hope it helps.
I also encountered the same problem today, but both sides are battery cars, and the owner of the straight car has been there to emphasize that I am a straight car, you are a turning car, and you don't understand the traffic laws. So the responsibility was all mine, obviously she was riding too fast and hit me, but I was going to lose money, and I didn't turn at that time, just crossed the road, and I was already riding straight.
Sample Vehicle Transfer Agreement 1.
Answer. Seller (Party A): Buyer (Party B): >>>More
Battery cars are also divided into two categories: one is non-motorized. >>>More
After the battery car is stolen, report to the public security organ, and after the public security organ makes a record, if the case is solved, it is possible to recover the stolen battery car. >>>More
Is it a pretend? Or use, our community has a charging pile with tree electricity life, the charging ** is relatively low, if there is a pile, I don't know how much I need, you can go to understand.