If he jumps into the river to save someone, finds that his physical strength is not good in the midd

If someone falls into the water near the river, I believe that most people will have the idea of wanting to save people, but some people have no way to implement it. After all, it is actually very dangerous to save people in the water, and if you are not careful, you may put yourself in it, and in such a situation, no one will condemn you if you can't save people. When saving people reasonably, we must pay attention to what we can, and if we do not consider the consequences, we may actually bring some responsibility to ourselves.

For example, if you save someone and throw half of them back, you may have to bear certain legal responsibilities for such behavior.

So you must think about it before saving people. <>

Taking responsibilitySome netizens may feel that they are saving people, so they will not be able to bear criminal responsibility no matter what.

In fact, blindly saving others is a kind of consumption of others, because if you don't save the person who has fallen into the water, others may rescue you. However, if others see someone rescued, they may not continue to rescue, and in this case, the best time to save people may be delayed. <>

If the person in the water loses his life because of this moment, then the first rescuer may have to bear some legal responsibility. In addition, when this matter is over, the rescuer may be attacked by others, after all, he went directly to save people without thinking about it clearly, and this behavior has a certain impact on others. Therefore, if you encounter such a situation, you must consider whether you can save people.

Reason to save people, don't jump into the water as soon as your brain is hot, want to save others, if you don't have the ability, it is very likely that you will put yourself in danger. Therefore, rescue must be done within one's ability, and must not be reckless for a while, and eventually cause a catastrophe. If you want to rescue but don't have the ability, you can seek help from others, or take a look at what is suitable for rescue around you, so that you can carry out rescue safely and effectively.

It shouldn't be counted, because his own will is to save people, but because he is physically exhausted, he will choose to give up.

He is not a crime, and he is not guilty of giving up if he finds that he is not physically able to save people halfway through, because the law has not yet clearly stipulated it, but he will be condemned by society. If it were me, I would definitely have to ensure my own safety before thinking about saving others.

Crime, such an act has violated the law, it is already suspected of murder, because you have thrown the other person halfway, then it will affect the other person's life.

This is an offence because it causes great harm to the person concerned and is likely to cause death.

This kind of behavior is not a crime, we are also kind to save people, but we don't think that our physical strength is exhausted, if this is a crime, then it will make many people feel cold.

If you find that your physical strength is not good after jumping into the river to save someone halfway through, then throwing the person away again is not considered a crime。Because there is a premise first, then this premise is actually physical strength. If you forcibly save people, then there is a possibility that both of them will end up in the river.

Therefore, it can also be seen that in rescue cases, in fact, personal factors should be considered, and whether there is a suspicion of breaking the law should be judged according to personal factors. Because when a person jumps into the water and wants to save the other party, then it means that the person's mood to save the other party is urgent, not pretentious. <>

Safety measures and these people in the process of saving people will also have a certain situation due to special reasons, here you can see many people, in fact, are in the state of saving people into the water. Then for them, they will not give up for other reasons, and life is very important in their hearts. Even if they will give up saving people for various reasons, it is also a kind of guilt for these people.

However, you can also do the corresponding safety measures when you go into the water to save people, so that many accidents will be reduced when you save people. <>

In fact, there are still many people who act bravely, but there are also some people who are afraid of their righteousness and courage, and in the end it becomes the sadness of the two families. Therefore, it can also be seen that everyone should have a certain tolerance and tolerance for those who are willing to go to righteousness and courage, so as not to make them feel cold. In the process of rescue, even if you don't have the ability to save people, you want to find a way to save people, then this is not a crime.

Behaviors worth learning because they are not capable of saving people, even if they go into the water to save them, the results of the last two people are also conceivable. There are also some people who will feel a lot of guilt in their hearts after giving up saving others because of physical exhaustion. I feel that I haven't done a good job, but as long as I do what I can, in fact, everyone thinks that this is a good person, and this is also a behavior worth learning from.

It doesn't belong. Because the situation is special and if you don't give up, you are in danger, so this situation is not a crime.

I think this situation is a crime, because if you save someone, he can't vent his physical strength halfway through the rescue, and if he wants to throw people down, then this is a crime, and it is equivalent to strangling the lives of others.

It is an illegal act because this kind of behavior has already constituted intentional injury, and it has also caused secondary harm to the person, and the circumstances are relatively serious.

Personally, I believe that there are at least three options.

1. Choose from the perspective of rescue success rate.

Whoever is close to the shore has a relatively higher success rate of being rescued. Therefore, it will not be considered who committed suicide by jumping into the river and who fell into the water. The only thing that needs to be considered is the distance between the two of them and the shore, and the person who is close to the shore is rescued first, the success rate is high, and the probability of saving him alive is greater.

It's the most rational and efficient option, and no one will criticize it. After all, the purpose of rescue is to help the person out of danger.

2. Choose from a perceptual point of view.

The man who committed suicide by jumping into the river did not want to live, and the man who fell into the water did not want to die, hoping that someone would save his life. Therefore, it must be the first to save the person who fell into the water, and to save him ashore first, which will also save his life. It not only conforms to the purpose of the rescuer, but also satisfies the wishes of the person who fell into the water, and everyone is happy.

Why don't you save the person who committed suicide by jumping into the river first, because it itself is rushing to die, and it has given up its own life. Even if he is rescued first, it is difficult to guarantee that he will not commit suicide by jumping into the river again, or choose other ways to end his life.

To save this kind of person, it is not just as simple as pulling him ashore from the river, but to rescue his mind, psychology and mentality, so that he can give up the idea of suicide. Otherwise, he will have him once, and he will not be able to save his life, and sooner or later he will end his life.

3. Choose from a rational point of view.

When faced with a suicide by jumping into the river and a person who has fallen overboard, the first thing to consider is whether you can swim. If you can't swim, then after entering the water, not only will you not be able to save either of them, but your life will also be threatened.

Moreover, there were originally only two people who fell into the water, but after they entered the water, they became three people who fell into the water. When others are rescuing, they also need to save one more person, and unintentionally adding difficulty to the rescue work of others. It's not about helping to save people, it's about adding to the chaos.

Therefore, if I couldn't swim, I wouldn't have chosen to go into the water to save those two people. Instead, you should seek help from other swimmers and call the police for help.

Generally speaking, when faced with a suicide by jumping into the river and a person who fell into the water, there are many choices about who saves whom. At the same time, you also need to consider whether you have the ability to rescue.

When considering sacrificing oneself for the sake of saving a human being, one needs to seriously consider whether the act is worth it. Here are some reasons to consider:

1.Personal values: Some people believe that their own lives are worth sacrificing in order to save the lives of others. This value is very noble and great, but at the same time, you need to pay attention to your own safety and the value of life.

2.Obey the law: Some countries and regions have laws that prohibit sacrificing oneself to save others. If you decide to do so, you may be breaking the law, which can lead to trouble and legal problems for yourself and your family.

3.Social responsibility: As a citizen, we have a responsibility to protect the lives and safety of others. If you are able to save the lives of others, this is a very important social responsibility and obligation.

4.Impact on Fannian's family: If you choose to sacrifice yourself in order to save the lives of others, this can have a huge impact and burden on your family. You need to consider their feelings and needs and make sure they get the necessary support and assistance.

To sum up, sacrificing oneself to save the dead is a very noble and courageous act, but at the same time it needs to be carefully considered. Before deciding whether or not to take such action, you need to think carefully about your own safety and the value of your life, as well as the needs of your family and the provisions of the law.

Not necessarily worth it.

A man who is bent on death.

If you save it, you will still go.

It's not worth it, unless you're idle and want to be a "good person".

A person who commits suicide can't think about it for a while, and if he can ensure his safety, he can save people, but he can't make trouble if he doesn't know water. With the increasing pressure of modern society, the number of suicides is also increasing year by year. In such a situation, many people will consider saving the suicide, but often these people will not care about their own safety, or even sacrifice themselves to save the suicide.

Is this behavior worth it? This article will discuss this topic by listing 6 specific reasons.

First of all: from a moral and human point of view, we should try to save people. Human life is priceless, and when life is in danger, we should do our best to save it, no matter what the cost.

If you sacrifice yourself to save the dead, although this act is very martyrdom, it is also a selfless and noble performance.

Secondly, from a moral and moral point of view, it is everyone's responsibility and obligation to help others. If we see a person in danger and we have the power to save him, then we should not hesitate to act. Although it may cost one's own life to do so, it is a noble act that is in line with social morality and moral ethics.

Finally, from the perspective of resource utilization, we should also do our best to help the victims. Everyone is valuable, and if we can save the victim and save his life, then we are not only saving a person's life, but also avoiding an underutilized social resource.

However, despite this, we should also realize that sacrificing ourselves to save others is not the only option, nor is it necessarily the best option. On the one hand, we should do our best to help others, but we should not neglect our own safety. If we don't have the ability to help, then it's best not to risk saving others, so as not to cause greater danger.

On the other hand, we should also actively promote the improvement of the social system and build a more harmonious, just and loving society. Only in this way can we truly solve the problem of suicide and make our society a better place.

Therefore, in order to help others, it is more necessary to act in a rational and safe way.

Summary: It is everyone's responsibility to help others, but we should also pay attention to safety. If you are not absolutely sure, you can't easily enter the water to save people, since you must be sure that you will be okay and can ensure your own safety before you can save people.

Is it worth sacrificing oneself to save the dead? This is a difficult question because human life, morality and responsibility are involved. Everyone may have different opinions and feelings on this issue, but I believe that there is no one answer that is absolutely right or wrong, only suitable or unsuitable.

I think that if I meet someone who wants to jump off a building or a river, I will try my best to dissuade him and let him see the hope and beauty of life. I would tell him that life is precious and should not be given up easily. I would tell him that he is not alone and that there are many people who care about him and love him.

I would tell him that he still has a lot of unfinished dreams and goals, and a lot of things that can be done. I will do my best to help him, to give him support and encouragement.

But if I find that my persuasion is ineffective and he still insists on ending his life, will I sacrifice myself to save him? At this time, I may hesitate and struggle. Because I know that if I did, I might have saved someone, but I might have lost myself.

I also have my own life, my own family and friends, my own dreams and goals. I also don't want them to lose me, to be sad and sad for me. I also don't want to let myself die in vain, without meaning and value.

So, I don't think it's necessarily worth sacrificing yourself to save the dead. Because by doing so, there is no guarantee that the suicide will appreciate my actions, nor that the suicide will change their thoughts and attitudes. Maybe he will regret his impulses, maybe he will continue to give up on himself.

Maybe he will cherish my sacrifice, maybe he will forget that I exist. What about me and the wild? I can only be an unsung hero, a tragic figure.

Of course, this is not to say that we should be indifferent and ignore the suffering and cries for help of the victims. We should do everything we can to help them, give them warmth and care. We should respect their choices and wishes, but we should also make them aware of the consequences and responsibilities.

We should touch them with love, not threaten them with death.

In short, sacrificing oneself to save the survivors is not a simple matter. It requires courage, wisdom and rationality. We can't just think of it as heroism or dedication, or as stupidity or cowardice.

We have to judge and decide according to the specific situation and environment. We need to consider our own interests and feelings and those of the other person. We want to do it without hurting ourselves or others.