Whether Jing Ke s assassination of King Qin was a righteous act, and whether Jing Ke s assassination

Look at the problem dialectically, the landlord, the following is the detailed information, I hope it will help the landlord In the eyes of many people, Jing Ke is a hero with heroic courage and a sense of justice. But in the eyes of historians, Jing Ke is not so simple, and literary historians and historians evaluate this character differently. Han Zhaoqi thinks:

Jing Ke is a warrior with strong martial arts and chivalrous courage, and his righteous act of assassinating Qin comes from his hatred of Qiang Qin's country and family, and it is also his last fight for his right to live. If it is said that Prince Yan Dan wants to assassinate Ying Zheng with his personal revenge, then Jing Ke's purpose is even more out of the chivalrous heart of saving the people of the six countries. Zhang Dake even used the word "anti-violence" to interpret Jing Ke's behavior.

Prince Dan didn't reuse Jing Ke at first, and even later asked him to assassinate Qin, but he didn't fully understand and trust him," Han Zhaoqi explained, "Therefore, Jing Ke did not want to 'die for his confidant', and the value of his actions did not lie in his personal righteousness, but in the fact that he represented the anti-violent heart of the people." However, there are also many historians who believe that "the evaluation of Jing Ke should not be too high". Zhang Chuanxi said

Jing Ke was in an era of individualism, he was driven by a concept of 'righteousness', although he was indeed brave, but his 'righteousness' was after all a small 'righteousness' of the individual, and Qin Shi Huang's great cause of unification was the great 'righteousness'. Therefore, I do not think it is necessary to elevate him to the level of a hero. Chen Chengjun, who also thinks that it is not appropriate to elevate Jing Ke, has a more interesting insight.

In fact, Jing Ke should be more of a common man in the Warring States Period, he likes to read, is good at lobbying, has a certain amount of knowledge, it can be said that he is a chivalrous man, but he is not a martial artist. Based on this point of view, Chen Chengjun reasonably explained why Jing Ke began to politely refuse Prince Dan's request to let him assassinate Qin, and then delayed it again and again. "He was waiting for a true assassin, a samurai capable of assassination.

But Prince Dan didn't allow him to wait any longer, so he had to go with Wuyang, and Wuyang was just a small character who killed people in the market, and when he arrived in the palace of King Qin, he was naturally frightened and changed color. And Jing Ke had to play this role by himself, which he was not willing to play. Chen Chengjun further said:

During the Warring States period, there were many such chivalrous warriors, and they stood up when the country was in trouble, but most of them had assistants. Jing Ke was an assassin himself, and I personally think he really can't die. ”

Yes! But Jing Ke didn't succeed.

Personally, I think it's wrong! At that time, the six countries were in dispute and wars, and it was the general trend for King Qin to unify the whole country, and blocking the unification was a bad thing for the country and the people!

Jing Ke assassinated the King of Qin, depending on which way to look at it. If we look at it from the perspective of historical development, this is wrong. China, there is no way yet, so quickly reunified.

From the perspective of the Yan country, at that time, small, against other countries. For the sake of his own development, it is not wrong to assassinate the King of Qin itself. So right and wrong, sometimes it's two-sided.

I think, at that time, either you die or I die, gamble.

From his standpoint, he was right, but unfortunately it didn't work out.