The difference between Intel Xeon E3 1230 and i7 2600K is detailed

Updated on number 2024-08-05
10 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-15

    I pack you in detail.

    The biggest difference of the 52214 is that it is lower than the i7 2600K, the TDP is only 80W, it supports ECC memory, and there is no integrated display. Of course, without integrated display, the power consumption decreases, and the temperature also decreases. If you install a discrete graphics card, then use Intel Xeon E3-1230, ** much lower, but the performance is better.

    Also, the CPU of the server version should be better; Instructions or something shouldn't be incomplete. I didn't see it in comparison. At the end of the list is Advanced Technologies, and there are three more supports.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-14

    The performance of Xeon E3 1230 is higher than i5 and lower than i7; The power consumption is only 80W lower than that of the i5; Removed the cumbersome core graphics card; The multiplier is not locked, which is the same as the i5 2500k and i7 2600k, which can be overclocked manually. Although you can't overclock, the effect of overclocking is not very good, but it is also DIY fun. However, E3 is a server version of the CPU, and the instruction set is not as complete as i5 and i7, which will affect the actual performance of the CPU to a certain extent.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-13

    1 e3 1230 performance higher than i5 lower i7 2 no overclocking at all 3 cheaper than 2500k cheaper.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    One is more than a thousand, and one is more than two thousand, you say.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    E3 1230 is a processor used on servers produced by Intel, of course, it can also be used on desktops, the performance is equivalent to i7 2600, but there is no integrated display, but its power consumption is lower, more stable, it just belongs to the server processor, and the attention is slightly less.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Xeon E3 1230 as mentioned above,The performance is very strong,**Only half of i7 (less than),In addition to no integrated display,Poor overclocking performance (basically unable to overclock),And sold more than 2,000i7There is no difference。 Now it is a more popular U, and many Intel platform builders have abandoned the i3 and i5 because of this.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    (1) This is E3-1230 (the first generation Xeon E3), the full Chinese name is "Intel Xeon E3-1230".

    2) The main parameters of Intel Xeon E3-1230 are as follows:

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    The E3 has hyper-threading - four cores and eight threads, and the performance is similar to that of the i7. But it can't be overclocked, there is no core graphics, and there is no intelligent response technology. It is more suitable for multi-** use.

    Of course, the game performance is also excessive. If you don't overclock, the motherboard doesn't have a lot of budget (B75 is enough) and doesn't use an SSD for caching. Then the E3 is definitely the first choice.

    The 3570k has only four threads. It can be overclocked, has a core graphics (estimated to be rarely used), and has intelligent responses. It is more suitable for gaming, overclocking and distribution enthusiasts.

    So choose according to your needs.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Personally, I think: Xeon can be, but it can't be overclocked.

    The 3570k can be overclocked.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Hello, in terms of performance alone, i7 6700 is better than E3 1230V5, because i7 6700 is clocked at a frequency and E3 is 6700, and the comprehensive performance is about 3%-5% higher than that of E3. But the ** of the i7 6700 is 400-500 yuan more expensive than the e3 1230v5. The i7 6700 loose piece is about 200 yuan cheaper than the i7 6700K loose piece, but the performance difference is about 8-10%.

    But from the platform, at this stage, the cost-effective is still the combination of i7 6700+B150, although the CPU of E3 1230V5 is about 400 cheaper than i7 6700, but the matching motherboard C232 series** is 300-400 yuan higher than the B150 motherboard, so the current cost performance of the i7 6700 platform is okay. The Z170 motherboard matched with i7 6700K is higher, and the platform is 600-900 yuan more expensive than the i7 6700 platform.

    However, there is still room for the E3 1230V5 to go down, and more C232 and C236 motherboards are gradually on the market, and there will inevitably be more cost-effective motherboards. It is expected that in the future, the ** of the E3 1230V5 platform will be cheaper than the current 400-500 yuan, which is more reasonable.

    So, if you want to choose at the moment, choose the i7 6700 + B150 combination if the cost is sufficient. If the cost is insufficient, it is recommended to wait for another 2-3 months before choosing the e3 platform.

Related questions
28 answers2024-08-05

If you don't overclock by default, it's indeed ivy

bridgee3 >>>More

3 answers2024-08-05

The E3-1230-V2 is better, evaluated from the following aspects: >>>More

6 answers2024-08-05

Since it is not overclocked, it is enough to choose the B85 motherboard, and the comparison chart of these three chips is attached below: >>>More

5 answers2024-08-05

This u is the same as the i7 both in terms of gaming and daily life. The same instruction set as L3 for 8M >>>More

23 answers2024-08-05

What do you use,E3Although it is very cost-effective, it is not suitable to play games,Because today's games have high requirements for the graphics card,On the contrary, the CPU,The demand is not large,Although there is a lot of data that shows that the CPU can improve the performance of the graphics card,That's because the graphics card is already powerless and ask the CPU for help,I use E3 to play large-scale 3D games with a utilization rate of 20%,I use the tragic 6870,FPS is less than 40,Large-scale battles are stuck.,The effect is all off, and sometimes I can't see the state of the body.。。。 >>>More