Historical Commentary Questions, 30 marks!!! The master is coming!!!

At the beginning of the Han Dynasty, Taoism was used, and Huang Lao's learning. Advocating quiet and inaction, I personally think that the Mohists are more suitable, the early Han Dynasty has a rejuvenation, the rule of Wenjing, the main purpose is to restore social productivity, increase the population, the Mohists advocate thrift, funeral, Shangxian, Shangtong, non-offensive These are very in line with the trend of the times and historical needs in the early Han Dynasty. Confucianism is not applicable to the early Han Dynasty, Confucianism is inferior in everything, learning and excellence are the best, and other ideas do not advocate that people engage in manual labor, how to restore social productivity without labor?

This is contrary to the theme of the times. As for the Legalists, it is reasonable to advocate the centralization of power by the monarch.

Ming Dynasty Legalist Dongchang Zhang Juzheng I don't have time to talk about it next time.

At the beginning of the Han Dynasty, I think Confucianism is more suitable for governing the country, because when the Han Dynasty was first established, people's hearts were uncertain, and Confucianism was needed to calm people's hearts. China, which has just gone through the baptism of war, should pay more attention"Benevolence".Thus consolidating imperial power.

At the beginning of the Ming Dynasty, I think it still depends on Confucianism, we all know that Zhu Yuanzhang was originally a beggar with an inferior status, and it is inevitable that some people will look down on him, and he is particularly sensitive to this, so he needs the Confucian idea of loyalty and patriotism to consolidate his throne. I think Confucianism is the way in which all the emperors of Chinese history have used to govern the country.

Confucianism, Confucianism's idea is to strengthen the monarchy, which is the need for centralization, and China's history needs to be centralized, and it is necessary to end the civil war to deal with the nomads and floods with the strength of the whole country.

Taoism proved to be suitable in the early Han Dynasty, this is proven by history, so I don't say much, as for the early years of the Ming Dynasty, I feel that everything is not a home! In Mongolia after just a few decades, people are united, as long as the world is stable! But after Zhu Yuanzhang, it is time to consider the strategy of governing the country, but history has proved that the Chinese people are very strong, and under the leadership of those few confused emperors of the Ming Dynasty, we have seriously passed nearly three hundred years! Hehe!

Taoist, didn't the Huang Lao doctrine be adopted in the early Han Dynasty?

If D had been chosen, the constitution would not have given the emperor great power, and it was precisely because Prussia led and completed the unification of Germany that the emperor would have been given great power.

Prussia completed the unification of Germany, this is a historical fact, and there is nothing to explain. It is written in the book that the dominant position in the German parliament was the bourgeoisie, which represented the emerging powers, not the Junker aristocracy, but the parliament did not completely determine the political affairs of the German state at that time.

This question is a straight question, because ACDs are all wrong, so you can only choose B

All power is given to the leader.