A8 5600K A86600K A105800K which one to choose

If it were me, I wouldn't either. I directly choose AMD X4 740 and then upgrade the graphics card to at least GTX650TI or HD7770 level At present, AMD 740 quad-core processor is not a big problem, the key problem is that the independent graphics card is A10 5800 core graphics HD7660D, combined with HD6670 crossfire, the comprehensive performance can not exceed HD7770 just to reach the level of HD7750, and the power consumption is still high, it is better to go directly to a single card. Third, AMD can also SSD under this configuration, which is a bit wasteful, and 500G mechanical hard disk is enough. Oh.

For these three comparisons, A105800K is recommended.

a8 5600k

Main frequency: HD7650D stream processor: 256.

GPU frequency: 760MHz

a8 6600k

Frequency: HD8570D stream processor: 256.

GPU frequency: 844MHz

a105800k

Main frequency: HD7660D stream processor: 384.

GPU frequency: 800MHz

Because the Richland architecture is not significantly improved compared to Trinity. In the CPU part, the A8 6600K and A105800K are basically the same. The core display part,It's only a strengthened version of VLIW 4,The difference in 44MHz frequency is negligible (it's the same for any super super), and 384 is more than 256 1 3 more stream processors。

The HD7660D overwhelms the HD8570D

If you use a single graphics card. It is recommended to choose ASRock FM2A75 Pro4 M, which has strong expansion capabilities, such as 4 memory slots (two 4G are installed now, and memory can be included in the future). The inductor has a heatsink there, which is suitable for overclocking the processor.

If you're using dual discrete graphics cards, GIGABYTE's F2A85XM HD3 is recommended. ASRock's dual graphics card slots are too close together, which affects heat dissipation. But Gigabyte is a dual graphics card slot with a large spacing.

The biggest disadvantage is that there are only 2 memory slots (if you have two 4G now, you can't add memory in the future.) If it is now equipped with a single 8G, then there is no dual-channel mode Two 4G memory can automatically turn on dual-channel, so that the bit width of the memory is increased from 64bit to 128bit). GIGABYTE's inductors don't have a heatsink there, and if you overclock the processor, the temperature of the inductor will increase.

The difference between the A75 and A85 chipsets is that the latter has two more SATA hard disk interfaces and supports the RAID 5 mode of the disk array. When using the APU's display core, the A75 supports dual-screen display, and the A85 supports 3-screen display. Presumably, you won't have to go to three screens.

Both are the same in terms of performance. The size is the same in terms of area (ASRock has a small height, but a large width of a sedan car. Gigabyte is tall but small in width).

ESATA and fiber optic interfaces are basically useless. Don't think about this split year bond two.

Of course, the Gigabyte GAF2A85XM HD3 is fine.

The eSATA interface is not used at all, and the commonly used equipment does not have the eSATA interface (all are used).

In the past, there was a portable hard drive with an ESATA interface, which was a little faster than the speed.

The optical fiber interface is not used, who will connect the optical fiber network directly to the machine (but there is no way, both boards are available).

1. The two are a little better than A8-9600.

2. However, compared with the Athlon 200GE at the lowest end of the ZEN architecture, there is no need to buy.

3. Because the performance of Athlon200GE is comparable to that of A8-9600, but the TDP power consumption is only 35W, which is not much different.